Without Precedent

evince

Truthmatters
http://tinyurl.com/24n5xs


Why is it so many Americans now dont trust the official story of 911?

Well when not even the people who chaired it believe the story I just dont understand why this is even a surprise to anyone.

Yet the media refuses to broach the subject?

Its amazing that in a country where the majority dont believe the official story(including the Chair who is a life long Republican and the Co chair) the media of our country still attempts to make any referance to 911 turthers as complete nut bags.

They are calling the majority of Americans nut bags?

How does that benifit a corporation to insult the majority its viewers?

How in the world can anyone see this as the motivated by a liberal agenda?




Book: Sept. 11 Panel Doubted Officials
By HOPE YEN, Associated Press Writer

Friday, August 4, 2006


(08-04) 23:19 PDT WASHINGTON, (AP) --


The Sept. 11 commission was so frustrated with repeated misstatements by the Pentagon and FAA about their response to the 2001 terror attacks that it considered an investigation into possible deception, the panel's chairmen say in a new book.


Republican Thomas Kean and Democrat Lee Hamilton also say in "Without Precedent" that their panel was too soft in questioning former New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani — and that the 20-month investigation may have suffered for it.


The book, a behind-the-scenes look at the investigation, recounts obstacles the authors say were thrown up by the Bush administration, internal disputes over President Bush's use of the attacks as a reason for invading Iraq, and the way the final report avoided questioning whether U.S. policy in the Middle East may have contributed to the attacks.


Kean and Hamilton said the commission found it mind-boggling that authorities had asserted during hearings that their air defenses had reacted quickly and were prepared to shoot down United Airlines Flight 93, which appeared headed toward Washington.


In fact, the commission determined — after it subpoenaed audiotapes and e-mails of the sequence of events — that the shootdown order did not reach North American Aerospace Command pilots until after all of the hijacked planes had crashed.


The book states that commission staff, "exceedingly frustrated" by what they thought could be deception, proposed a full review into why the FAA and the Pentagon's NORAD had presented inaccurate information. That ultimately could have led to sanctions.


Due to a lack of time, the panel ultimately referred the matter to the inspectors general at the Pentagon and Transportation Department. Both are preparing reports, spokesmen said this week.


"Fog of war could explain why some people were confused on the day of 9/11, but it could not explain why all of the after-action reports, accident investigations and public testimony by FAA and NORAD officials advanced an account of 9/11 that was untrue," the book states.


The questioning of Giuliani was considered by Kean and Hamilton "a low point" in the commission's examination of witnesses during public hearings. "We did not ask tough questions, nor did we get all of the information we needed to put on the public record," they wrote.


Commission members backed off, Kean and Hamilton said, after drawing criticism in newspaper editorials for sharp questioning of New York fire and police officials at earlier hearings. The editorials said the commission was insensitive to the officials' bravery on the day of the attacks.
 
no your cheese AA is in question
You should stand side by side with Cindy Shehan

So can you say anything about the fact that the people who were put in charge of the 911 commission dont even stand behind what was found?
 
there are thousand of uneducated morons easily led, you could be there leader.
Darla, I see you have not worked with spinner on his grammer or use of there/their yet. I thought you were having progress ?


He sure does sound more like an uneducated hick than I do.
 
Back
Top