Woodward Claims Saudi's Increased Oil Production To Aid Republicans

Prakosh

Senior Member
Looks like Bob Woodward is willing to take any side of an issue and certainly can tell which way the wind is apt to be blowing in order to take advantage of the latest pro or anti-Bush feelings in order to generate book sales. That being said it appears that he has uncovered a few little gems that should ingraciate him to the administration for good now.

Woodward Finds Reality: Condi Blew Off 9/11 Warnings, Andrew Card Wanted Rumsfeld Fired, Saudis are Lowering Prices to Help Republicans Maintain Control of Congress, And More...


White House 'Ignored' Iraq Warning
Financial Times
All Financial Times News

The Bush administration was shaken on Friday by revelations from a new book by Bob Woodward, the veteran investigative reporter, which said Andrew Card, the former White House chief of staff, had twice tried to force the resignation of Donald Rumsfeld, defence secretary, over his handling of the Iraq war.

State of Denial by the Washington Post reporter who uncovered the Watergate scandal, paints a picture of an administration riven by personal rivalries, with Mr Rumsfeld at one point refusing to take calls from Condoleezza Rice, then national security adviser. It claims that even Laura Bush, President George W. Bush's wife, had misgivings about the defence secretary.

It also suggests Ms Rice "brushed off" a July 2001 briefing from the CIA director and former head of counterterrorism, about an imminent terrorist threat. That contrasts with claims from Ms Rice that the administration had in its first eight months been "at least as aggressive" as the Clinton administration.

Critics could use the account to question the White House's credibility on its handling of the Iraq war and the "war on terror". It comes at a time when Mr Bush has forcefully made the case that his actions since 9/11 have made the US safer.

Tony Snow, White House spokesman, dismissed the book as "like cotton candy. It kind of melts on contact", and said it was driven by those on the "losing side of the argument...The average Washington memoir ought to be subtitled: 'If only they had listened to me'.?"

He rejected some of the book's central allegations, denying the White House played down the threats from the insurgency in Iraq and ignored urgent calls for more troops. Mr Bush has consistently defended Mr Rumsfeld.

The New York Times was the first to report on the book, an embarrassment to the Washington Post, which is due to publish extracts on Sunday. It is the second blow to the newspaper, which was also scooped on the outing of Deep Throat, Mr Woodward's source during Watergate.

In a claim that could fuel conspiracy theories about the recent oil price decline – in an interview to be broadcast on CBS on Sunday – Mr Woodward described a conversation between Prince Bandar bin Sultan and Mr Bush in which the former Saudi ambassador said he could ease oil prices ahead of the elections.

"They could go down very quickly. That's the Saudi pledge. Certainly over the summer, or as we get closer to the election, they could increase production several million barrels a day," Mr Woodward said.

Full Story
 
You know, I just heard on c-span that Dennis Hassert, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Had these incriminating emails of Representative Foley with the 16 year old Paige since November of 2005.

Do you think that this info on Foley was conveniently held back from the public until this time of "need"?

What I am saying is that this Woodward stuff is pretty incriminating and maybe Hassert is the one that really leaked this info and "ate his own kin" to deflect from other very important knews, like this Woodward stuff and the absolute mahem going on in Iraq?

Cynical? maybe....

care
 
I think it is more likely that a D held it until a month before election...


and.....drum roll............... YOU are WRONG! it was the repubs in power choosing to save this guys house seat for the republicans OVER THE WELFARE OF THE CHILDREN working there.... pretty sic, as the kid said...only the repub leadership is involved in covering it up!!!
 
and.....drum roll............... YOU are WRONG! it was the repubs in power choosing to save this guys house seat for the republicans OVER THE WELFARE OF THE CHILDREN working there.... pretty sic, as the kid said...only the repub leadership is involved in covering it up!!!
And ... Drum roll please... We find out they took it to the House Clerk and that there was an investigation where they were not presented with the evidence that they now have!

LOL. In other words there was no coverup, there was a quick and direct investigation.
 
And ... Drum roll please... We find out they took it to the House Clerk and that there was an investigation where they were not presented with the evidence that they now have!

LOL. In other words there was no coverup, there was a quick and direct investigation.

pleaseeeeeeeee Damo, are you saying that they just took the first few emails and searched no further...to find out if he was a preditor and that all they did was TAKE forley's word for it and slap him on the hand IN THIS DAY AND AGE.... cut me a break!

Then why didn't they let the Democrat on the Ethics committee in on this issue? HUH?

They covered it up for political advantage. PERIOD. And if they did not know about the other emails, THEY CHOSE NOT TO FIND OUT ABOUT THEM.
again, period.

Hassert should step down if he did not pursue this issue with Foley to the full extent of the Law, and to the full extent needed to entrust the safety in the house of representatives hands for the 15 and 16 year old pages...imo.!

Care
 
It's Hastert. And I'm sure we'll hear more as it develops.

Like I showed earlier on another thread of the same subject...

It has appeared to me the past two years that the Rs have actively worked toward their own demise. I no longer am surprised when I find out things they've done.
 
It's Hastert. And I'm sure we'll hear more as it develops.

Like I showed earlier on another thread of the same subject...

It has appeared to me the past two years that the Rs have actively worked toward their own demise. I no longer am surprised when I find out things they've done.

yes, they remind me of democrats of the past's theme song of murphy's law, what can go wrong will go wrong! :D

Just one thing after another is being exposed....destiny, karma, whatever...is coming back to haunt them!
 
I think it is more likely that a D held it until a month before election...

If they did, and that remains to be seen, it is a strong sign that the Democrats are finally starting to act like politicians instead of doormats. I'd say such action is long overdue.
 
And just think what will be exposed if in 2008 the repubs have lost both the presidency and the congress :)
 
Back
Top