??....did the right propose to take the military out of private hands and make it a government controlled and owned business?.......I don't know why you think we can't deny your claims are true, when they are so obviously false......
You know what? If there is a point to be missed, you can be relied on to miss it with unswerving accuracy.
how could I miss it.....I grabbed it and shoved it up your ass......now you're groping for a way to handle it.....
you thought you had a funny, but it displayed your ignorance in so many ways that it backfired on you......
Please, explain to us how his claim is so obviously false and what does the fact that the military is a socialist institution have to do with the price of tea in China???....did the right propose to take the military out of private hands and make it a government controlled and owned business?.......I don't know why you think we can't deny your claims are true, when they are so obviously false......
explain to us how his claim is so obviously false
Silly claim? Hell it's an indesputable fact. Isn't the military a government program? Does not the government own the means to production in the military? Is the military not operated under the principle of collectivism? Shoot, the armies own motto is "An Army of One".That sounds pretty collectivist to me. If you're in the military isn't your pay, housing, food and clothing, equipment, health care and training all provided for by the government? Please explain to me how this is not socialism but the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is? I mean this doesn't make sense in face of the facts. All of the military is owned and operated on a collectivist principle by the government where as even with the PPACA our health care system is still mostly private sector operated. Please, explain this apparent contradiction to me.odd, perhaps to some it isn't "obviously false" if it needs explaining.......I suspect it's less obvious to those without brains, so for your benefit I will point it out.....
it is false, and obviously so to most, that the Iraq war (implied by the claim of a $3trillion unnecessary war) had anything to do with either Christianity or capitalism (not to mention whether it was "unnecessary").......you can add to that your silly claim that the military is a socialist institution.......
No, actually that was a very clever use of the element of irony by Tom to make a very humerous comment. It just shows your limitations PiMP that you didn't get a chuckle out of it like the rest of us did.how could I miss it.....I grabbed it and shoved it up your ass......now you're groping for a way to handle it.....
you thought you had a funny, but it displayed your ignorance in so many ways that it backfired on you......
No, actually that was a very clever use of the element of irony by Tom to make a very humerous comment. It just shows your limitations PiMP that you didn't get a chuckle out of it like the rest of us did.
and Shell Oil!Military is socialist but they kill for baby Jesus.
POMP is not what I would have said he's full of but he's not the only one around here guilty of being full of that....myself included.PiMP is full of POMP.
???.....no it isn't....I just disputed it....Hell it's an indesputable fact.
Does not the government own the means to production in the military?
no....Is the military not operated under the principle of collectivism?
defending a nation's borders from attack is a function of government......providing health insurance is not.....Shoot, the armies own motto is "An Army of One".That sounds pretty collectivist to me. If you're in the military isn't your pay, housing, food and clothing, equipment, health care and training all provided for by the government? Please explain to me how this is not socialism but the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is? I mean this doesn't make sense in face of the facts. All of the military is owned and operated on a collectivist principle by the government where as even with the PPACA our health care system is still mostly private sector operated. Please, explain this apparent contradiction to me.
no it's not....I've just disputed it....As for the question of the Iraq war being unneccessary, why that's an indisputable fact too.
It's perfectly clear now that in no way did Iraq pose a clear and present danger to US National Security. A policy standard used for determining the necessity of war since the beginning of our Republic. Please explain to me how Iraq was a clear and present danger to US National Security which necessitated war?
PiMP is full of POMP.