If you had served, you would know that the military receives hours of training about Article 92, of the UCMJ.Akin to Abu Ghraib and the Malay massacre.
Does anyone here disagree American troops should be required to follow illegal orders?
Disobeying an unlawful order is required by law!
It’s required by the UCMJ.Akin to Abu Ghraib and the Malay massacre.
Does anyone here disagree American troops should be required to follow illegal orders?
Disobeying an unlawful order is required by law!
Cry more, Trumpper.If you had served, you would know that the military receives hours of training about Article 92, of the UCMJ.
These Congress people are trying to to cause friction between the officer ranks and the enlisted ranks.
They should be prosecuted.
Ok…It’s required by the UCMJ.
Civilians, like you, are not covered by the UCMJ.
They have already been trained by far better people than these provocatiors.Cry more, Trumpper.
Reminding the troops of their obligations is nowhere close to sedition.
Ok, not a bad thing to remind them.They have already been trained by far better people than these provocatiors.
Trying to stir up friction between officers and enlisted is seditious.Ok, not a bad thing to remind them.
The insane president said reminding them is seditious.
Telling troops that they are required to refuse illegal orders is stirring up friction between officers and enlisted.Trying to stir up friction between officers and enlisted is seditious.
Was there a problem with officers not being obeyed?
Cry more, Trumpper!I’ve asked a field grade officer, a bird colonel, on active duty, if there is a problem with discipline in the ranks…none, was the answer.
Thesecmeddlers are trying to stir up trouble in the ranks.
Disgusting.
Bullshit.If you had served, you would know that the military receives hours of training about Article 92, of the UCMJ.
These Congress people are trying to to cause friction between the officer ranks and the enlisted ranks.
They should be prosecuted.
Like Obama killing American citizens with drone attacks?Akin to Abu Ghraib and the Malay massacre.
Does anyone here disagree American troops should be required to follow illegal orders?
Disobeying an unlawful order is required by law!
Who determines the legal status of an order?Bullshit.
US enlisted have clear duty to disobey illegal orders. Their loyalty is to the constitution, not the president.
What about….Like Obama killing American citizens with drone attacks?
They couldn't specify a single "illegal order" for some reason.Akin to Abu Ghraib and the Malay massacre.
Does anyone here disagree American troops should be required to follow illegal orders?
Disobeying an unlawful order is required by law!
So, they never said there were illegal orders. Dumb shit!They couldn't specify a single "illegal order" for some reason.
An obvious threat to democracy....
Akin to Abu Ghraib and the Malay massacre.
Does anyone here disagree American troops should be required to follow illegal orders?
Disobeying an unlawful order is required by law!
I hope there is. They are likely to be lied to by TACO loyalists.I see the unfaithful pEarl has weighed in but haven't read his excuses yet. This should be interesting.
Let's say troops are deployed to an American city, because they are. What would constitute an unlawful order? Firing on protesters? Assaulting protesters? Arresting protesters? Looking the other way if police brutality is happening? Stopping police brutality? Is there a rule book for something for them to consult?
My thoughts exactly.I hope there is. They are likely to be lied to by TACO loyalists.