The lawyer (and I use the term loosely) told the presiding judge that he was challenging absentee ballots filed in person. He claimed that they were fraudulent.
Upon questioning by the judge, this same lawyer then admitted that both HE and HIS WIFE voted absentee ballot in person.
Now, should we have expected anything but total legal incompetence from the tRump legal "gang that couldn't shoot straight"?
Upon questioning by the judge, this same lawyer then admitted that both HE and HIS WIFE voted absentee ballot in person.
Now, should we have expected anything but total legal incompetence from the tRump legal "gang that couldn't shoot straight"?