'You're a bit of a c*** yourself' Judge hits back at swearing Nazi-saluting thug

cancel2 2022

Canceled
Judge-698737.jpg



John Hennigan made the mistake of calling Judge Patricia Lynch, QC, a “c***” as she jailed him for 18 months.
In measured tones, Judge Lynch replied: “You’re a bit of a c*** yourself. Being offensive to me doesn’t help.”
Hennigan, 50, shouted: “Go f*** yourself!

Read more: http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/69...a-Lynch-hits-back-swearing-Nazi-John-Hennigan
 
Why do you guys still wear those dumb uncomfortable wigs?

I agree that it is totally stupid and anachronistic but maybe this will help to explain?

As you can imagine, the horsehair wigs are scratchy, hot and uncomfortable, and robes just as much. The wigs and robes are also expensive, costing at least a couple hundred pounds and up to the thousands for more ornate wigs and higher quality robes. Those who support the traditional garb say there are a few great reasons for continuing wearing the wigs and gowns: it enforces a solemnity and authority of the law for criminals who otherwise devalue it; it keeps juries from favouritism based on a barrister’s dress, and it has the more practical benefit of helping disguise the courtroom players should any criminal try to find them for revenge.

However, in the past decade those who wish to move toward more 21st century-appropriate garb have been gaining ground, and there are now exceptions to the wig rule. Now, barristers need not wear the traditional wig and gown when they stand before the supreme court or in civil or family cases; officials in family court still wear robes, but they’re much more simplified. Wigs are now only required in criminal cases.

http://modernnotion.com/brits-still-wear-wigs-in-court/
 
They follow Eighteenth Century models, like the US Konstituting. Mostly we don't wear wigs nowadays, except when tories try to attract Americans.

Perhaps Wales could contribute an original idea, instead of just bending over for the rest of Greater Britain...
 
Perhaps Wales could contribute an original idea, instead of just bending over for the rest of Greater Britain...

It was Treorchy-born Donald Davies who developed the idea of sending large amounts of data across the world by breaking it up into smaller packets of data which move independently through a series of networks. Larry Roberts caught word of the idea when developing the ARPANET, which was the precursor for the modern internet.

So without him, Iolo wouldn't be able to spout his Troyskist bollocks on t'internet, now there is a prime example of true irony!!

http://www.thocp.net/biographies/davies_donald.htm
 
Last edited:
It was Treorchy-born Donald Davies who developed the idea of sending large amounts of data across the world by breaking it up into smaller packets of data which move independently through a series of networks. Larry Roberts caught word of the idea when developing the ARPANET, which was the precursor for the modern internet. So without him Iolo wouldn't be able to spout his Troyskist bollocks on t'internet.

http://www.thocp.net/biographies/davies_donald.htm

LOL Like no one ever thought of breaking down a large shipment into smaller containers before.
 
LOL Like no one ever thought of breaking down a large shipment into smaller containers before.

You may be hot shit at civil engineering but not so much with datacomms. I suggest that you read up on the differences between circuit switching and packet switched networks.

http://www.computerworld.com/article/2593382/networking/networking-packet-switched-vs-circuit-switched-networks.html

[url]http://www.rfwireless-world.com/Terminology/circuit-switching-vs-packet-switching.html

[/URL]
 
Ha! You can't dispute my argument so you go personal, and irrelevant.

What argument? The concept of packet switching was truly revolutionary and ARPANET used it primarily to build military networks that might have to sustain heavy losses in a war hence the need for automatic alternate routing of data using datagrams rather than packets. Each datagram would find its way through the network and hence could easily arrive out of sequence and have to be reassembled at the destination switch.

http://www.sqa.org.uk/e-learning/HardOSEss04CD/page_10.htm
 
Last edited:
What argument? The concept of packet switching was truly revolutionary and ARPANET used it primarily to build military networks that might have to sustain heavy losses in a war hence the need for automatic alternate routing of data using datagrams rather than packets. Each datagram would find its way through the network and hence could easily arrive out of sequence and have to be reassembled at the destination switch.

http://www.sqa.org.uk/e-learning/HardOSEss04CD/page_10.htm

Like no one ever thought of breaking down a secret large shipment into smaller containers before, and shipping those containers via alternate routes.
 
Like no one ever thought of breaking down a secret large shipment into smaller containers before, and shipping those containers via alternate routes.

I am sure that you know about buildings and shit, but you are just talking out of your arse here. I spent over 30 years in IT and datacomms, grant me that I might actually know a bit more than you on this subject.
 
I am sure that you know about buildings and shit, but you are just talking out of your arse here. I spent over 30 years in IT and datacomms, grant me that I might actually know a bit more than you on this subject.

This is simply a repeat of your post ten. I didn't buy it then...
 
Never said you didn't. Just that the concept that you claim is "brilliant" is just a repeat of what smart folks have done for thousands of years.

Gotta love you IT guys. Think you've invented the wheel.
 
Never said you didn't. Just that the concept that you claim is "brilliant" is just a repeat of what smart folks have done for thousands of years.

Gotta love you IT guys. Think you've invented the wheel.

The concept of teleportation is simple enough, it's the implementation that is a bit tricky!!
 
I gather that Milagro and Establishment have been on their usual racist kick - usual in scumbags without an argument to their false names. Since they can't be jailed or kicked, I suppose they just have to be ignored, as I usually do.
 
Back
Top