It isn't about marriage and "equal rights"

Status
Not open for further replies.
I don't care if they have it. It is just not normal and it is deviant. And both can be true. You don't have to like the truth just like you don't have to like the UN coming up in the morning. That doesn't stop the truth.

You made the claim that it was "psychologically proven". Obviously you were lying when you made that claim.

If you want to call all sex that isn't strictly for procreation "deviant" that is fine. But the claims you made in that post are blatantly bogus. If a couple has anal sex it does not mean anyone enjoys violence or cannot satisfy a woman. And it certainly says nothing about the size of anyone's penis. Your entire post was simply bullshit.
 
So anyone who breaks "God's Laws" is immoral? Hmmmm... It seems to me that lying is also against God's Laws. But I supposed you think you should be able to pick & choose which laws are serious and which are not?

Also, I do you call women who speak in church "immoral"?

And is the Judeo-Christian religion the only source of morality?

Yes anyone who breaks Gods laws is immoral. Lying is immoral. I don't get to pick and choose. God does.

God is the source of morality. Notice EVERY religion regardless the God they pray too recognizes that being queer is an abomination.

You obviously don't understand. You can be queer if you want. I really don't care. Stop trying to get me to accept it as normal. It is like getting me to accept pedophilia as normal. It won't happen.
 
Yes anyone who breaks Gods laws is immoral. Lying is immoral. I don't get to pick and choose. God does.

God is the source of morality. Notice EVERY religion regardless the God they pray too recognizes that being queer is an abomination.

You obviously don't understand. You can be queer if you want. I really don't care. Stop trying to get me to accept it as normal. It is like getting me to accept pedophilia as normal. It won't happen.

There are several pagan faiths that do not see being gay as an abomination.

Allowing gay marriage is not about you accepting anything. If a gay couple lives together with a license or does not have the license has nothing to do with you. That is what you cannot seem to grasp.
 
So I offer a different translation than King James does. That doesn't make me a hater. You're a hater for not being tolerant of my alternate translation.
 
There are several pagan faiths that do not see being gay as an abomination.

Allowing gay marriage is not about you accepting anything. If a gay couple lives together with a license or does not have the license has nothing to do with you. That is what you cannot seem to grasp.

Actually it does have something to do with me. It is redefining an institution that thousands of years of social order has created.

I don't give two shits if you and Homo Howey want to spoon. You just can't call it a marriage as it changes the definition. That is what you cannot seem to grasp.

We have offered the queers all sorts of legal alternatives for them to lead their deviant lifestyles. They have rejected them. The goal is to transform the definition of marriage to ultimately tear down the institution. That is what you cannot seem to grasp. Maybe gobbling on Howeys cock keeps you from reading every word
 
I ax you about it to better understand your stance on the issue. You say that a man sticking his dick up a woman's butt is practiced by married couples, so it stands to reason that you do it. I don't do that shit, and neither does anyone else I know.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top