Trial predictions?

[Jarod]

It seems the trumpets are adamant that there was no crime charged and no evidence of a crime in Trumps NY trial.

The non-trumpers see that a crime was charged and that evidence was presented.

Looks like closing Arguments might start as soon as Monday.



So what is your prediction?


I never know what a jury is going to do, but I think this one could go either way. There is evidence for every element of the crimes, but if the jury believes it all adds up to reasonable doubt or not, I cannot guess.

My gut says they will not be an outright acquittal, so if I had to guess I would say hung jury or conviction.


From my view, a single misdemeanor conviction would be enough for justice to at least start.

 

[Earl]

My prediction is that you are going to be fired from your receptionist job of you don’t stop posting and stealing time from your employer.

 

[TOP]

It seems the trumpets are adamant that there was no crime charged and no evidence of a crime in Trumps NY trial.

The non-trumpers see that a crime was charged and that evidence was presented.

Looks like closing Arguments might start as soon as Monday.



So what is your prediction?


I never know what a jury is going to do, but I think this one could go either way. There is evidence for every element of the crimes, but if the jury believes it all adds up to reasonable doubt or not, I cannot guess.

My gut says they will not be an outright acquittal, so if I had to guess I would say hung jury or conviction.


From my view, a single misdemeanor conviction would be enough for justice to at least start.

There should be an outright acquittal...there is no crime...

 

[Jarod]

There should be an outright acquittal...there is no crime...

Is that your prediction?

 

[Jarod]

My prediction is that you are going to be fired from your receptionist job of you don’t stop posting and stealing time from your employer.

My prediction is that one day you will see you are embarrassing yourself with fake claims in an attempt to deflect.

 

[ThatOwlWoman]

It seems the trumpets are adamant that there was no crime charged and no evidence of a crime in Trumps NY trial.

The non-trumpers see that a crime was charged and that evidence was presented.

Looks like closing Arguments might start as soon as Monday.



So what is your prediction?


I never know what a jury is going to do, but I think this one could go either way. There is evidence for every element of the crimes, but if the jury believes it all adds up to reasonable doubt or not, I cannot guess.

My gut says they will not be an outright acquittal, so if I had to guess I would say hung jury or conviction.


From my view, a single misdemeanor conviction would be enough for justice to at least start.

Your guess is a lot more informed than mine. I haven't a clue. The news has been reporting lately that various elected MAGATs have been putting in appearances in the courtroom, either to kiss the Gropingfuehrer's ring, or to influence the jury, or both. Think that will have an effect on the verdict?

 

[ThatOwlWoman]

My prediction is that one day you will see you are embarrassing yourself with fake claims in an attempt to deflect.

My guess is that neither pEarl nor Toxic will ever mature enough to have an adult discussion. Lies and deflection and insults -- that's about the extent of their abilities. lol

 

[Earl]

My prediction is that one day you will see you are embarrassing yourself with fake claims in an attempt to deflect.

Since you are wrong 99.99% of the time…

 

[Earl]

My guess is that neither pEarl nor Toxic will ever mature enough to have an adult discussion. Lies and deflection and insults -- that's about the extent of their abilities. lol

Take a hike, toxic bitch.

 

[Jarod]

Your guess is a lot more informed than mine. I haven't a clue. The news has been reporting lately that various elected MAGATs have been putting in appearances in the courtroom, either to kiss the Gropingfuehrer's ring, or to influence the jury, or both. Think that will have an effect on the verdict?

I doubt it, I have more faith in the jury system than to imagine the audience often affects them much.

It’s my belief that usually a jury bases their decision on the evidence and the law. Not always.

 

[Jarod]

Since you are wrong 99.99% of the time…

Example? Or is that something else you’ve made up?

 

[Earl]

Example? Or is that something else you’ve made up?

Your posts:

“”The American taxpayers are paying the highest federal income tax in history.”

“Twenty five states are not challenging the Colorado decision to remove Trump from the ballot.”

The naked attemp to destroy democracy in Colorado by the far left Democratic Socialist loons will not be forgotten. The American voters decide for whom they vote.


Answer the phones or you are going to be fired.

 

[TOP]

Is that your prediction?

No... I said that's what it should be.... but it''s impossible to predict the outcome of a sham... Although aren't there jurors who are attorneys? How could they decide for anything but acquittal?

 

[Jarod]

No... I said that's what it should be.... but it''s impossible to predict the outcome of a sham... Although aren't there jurors who are attorneys? How could they decide for anything but acquittal?

Because they believe the evidence presented proof the crime beyond reasonable doubt. You have been brainwashed to believe it’s a shame, no matter what. A grand jury would not have approved a sham indictment, and a judge would have thrown out a sham indictment by now.

Our judicial system has checks and balances to make sure shams do not get prosecuted.

 

[Jarod]

Your posts:

“”The American taxpayers are paying the highest federal income tax in history.”

“Twenty five states are not challenging the Colorado decision to remove Trump from the ballot.”

The naked attemp to destroy democracy in Colorado by the far left Democratic Socialist loons will not be forgotten. The American voters decide for whom they vote.


Answer the phones or you are going to be fired.

I’ve posted here thousands and thousands of times. I’ve made errors, but we were discussing predictions. You claimed I’m wrong 99.9% of the time. Stupid!

 

[Earl]

Because they believe the evidence presented proof the crime beyond reasonable doubt. You have been brainwashed to believe it’s a shame, no matter what. A grand jury would not have approved a sham indictment, and a judge would have thrown out a sham indictment by now.

Our judicial system has checks and balances to make sure shams do not get prosecuted.

Not in NYC.

 

[TOP]

Because they believe the evidence presented proof the crime beyond reasonable doubt. You have been brainwashed to believe it’s a shame, no matter what. A grand jury would not have approved a sham indictment, and a judge would have thrown out a sham indictment by now.

Our judicial system has checks and balances to make sure shams do not get prosecuted.

And that's why so many people are questioning the judicial system... Use the checks and balances were not in place...

 

[Jarod]

No... I said that's what it should be.... but it''s impossible to predict the outcome of a sham... Although aren't there jurors who are attorneys? How could they decide for anything but acquittal?

So are you willing to make a prediction?

 

[Earl]

I’ve posted here thousands and thousands of times. I’ve made errors, but we were discussing predictions. You claimed I’m wrong 99.9% of the time. Stupid!

OK,100% of the time, you are wrong, stupid,

 

[Jarod]

And that's why so many people are questioning the judicial system... Use the checks and balances were not in place...

Sure they were…. A grand jury and 5 judges thus far have approved the progression of this case so far…. Still, no conviction unless another jury says so.