So, it being "absolute" is your subjective opinion. Otherwise, you would present an argument.It's simple. It just means there is an absolute right and wrong, independent of opinion, consensus, cultural norms.
An example of absolute right v. wrong would be wanton murder. There is no realistic way to argue that murdering someone because you want to is anything other than wrong.So, it being "absolute" is your subjective opinion. Otherwise, you would present an argument.
An example of absolute right v. wrong would be wanton murder. There is no realistic way to argue that murdering someone because you want to is anything other than wrong.
There are objective truths and objective falsehoods.An example of absolute right v. wrong would be wanton murder. There is no realistic way to argue that murdering someone because you want to is anything other than wrong.
It doesn't take a law to know that murder is wrong. It takes a law to allow government to deal with the murder rather than the members of society directly.Okay, but nothing to do with objectivity. Every nation has laws.
The guilt felt by mentally healthy adults is your conscience telling you there is an absolute standard of right and wrong, independent of laws, opinions, consensus. Murder, cheating, lying, rape, theft are examples.So, it being "absolute" is your subjective opinion. Otherwise, you would present an argument.
So, morality is opinion?It doesn't take a law to know that murder is wrong. It takes a law to allow government to deal with the murder rather than the members of society directly.
Seems speculative. Care to provide evidence?The guilt felt by mentally healthy adults is your conscience telling you there is an absolute standard of right and wrong
What does the letter have to do with morality being objective?Martin Luther King's letter from a Birmingham jail, and the Nuremburg trials both invoked objective morality
Morality is something that is nearly universally accepted. Or, are you trying to tell us that murder is acceptable within society simply because it cannot be quantified or something?So, morality is opinion?
I am arguing against referring to morality as objective.Morality is something that is nearly universally accepted. Or, are you trying to tell us that murder is acceptable within society simply because it cannot be quantified or something?
Martin Luther King articulated that there is a moral law higher than the laws of men, higher than the opinions of men. Everyone recognized that Martin Luther King, and also the lawyers at the Nuremberg trials were invoking an objective morality, and nobody was confused about it.What does the letter have to do with morality being objective?
You keep saying it is not about the Christian religion, but use Christians to make your point.Martin Luther King articulated that there is a moral law higher than the laws of men, higher than the opinions of men. Everyone recognized that Martin Luther King, and also the lawyers at the Nuremberg trials were invoking an objective morality, and nobody was confused about it.
But some behaviors lead to thriving more than others.First, the term "objective morality" and too many meanings and is too vague to have a real sense.
Objective does not mean true, as there are things objectively false.
Men are rational enough to figure out basic morality.Martin Luther King articulated that there is a moral law higher than the laws of men, higher than the opinions of men. Everyone recognized that Martin Luther King, and also the lawyers at the Nuremberg trials were invoking an objective morality, and nobody was confused about it.
Incorrect. I specifically and intentionally used the example of the Nuremberg trials because I have no idea what the religious beliefs were, if any, of the American, British, and Soviet lawyers and judges.You keep saying it is not about the Christian religion, but use Christians to make your point.
Agree. But that has nothing to do with objectivity.But some behaviors lead to thriving more than others.