Head of Hamas government in Gaza eliminated

Muslims only control 99% of the middle east.

The greedy Jews won't give you the other 1% - NO FAIR...
They will eventually. Dumbasses ^ think that the US-backed genocidal Jewish assholes are going to be tolerated.

Haw, haw...................................haw.

uncensored.jpg



Read, you prosemitic dumbass;


Apologize to the forum for your scurrilous attempt to subvert history ^ ^
 
You are projecting your dishonesty.

You have lied repeatedly to cover for Hamas and other terrorists.
There are more than one hundred million conservatives and their children in the United States that the DNC would love to either imprison or eliminate altogether.

No doubt - but utterly irrelevant to the genocide you promote against the Jews.

Let me know when you get around to something relevant.

ROFL

Your dishonesty knows no bounds.

This is like saying gas chambers were not relevant to the Holocaust.


You have the nerve to deny Israel's genocide,

I deny Big Foot and the Loch Ness Monster as well - and they are more real than the terrorist fiction you're trying to sell.

just because Israel is the perpetrator. Your position is that there is no genocide, and that the Arabs totally deserve the genocide that you deny is occurring.

There is no genocide. The Terrorist group Hamas is being destroyed because they are evil and have engaged in crimes against humanity. When the the terrorist group is destroyed, there were still be a billion Arabs on the planet and still over a million Arabs in Israel.

You flat out lie about "genocide" to try and create sympathy for the terrorists you support.

Stay focused. We're talking about Israel's genocide of Arabs.

That is impossible. No one can "discuss" a delusional lie.

The "Islamic world" is not being discussed.

ROFL

You support genocide of the Jews, but you don't want that discussed - how pathetic.

Since 1979, Iran has been the only attacker of Israel.

Well, other than Hamas, Hezbollah, Al Qaeda, ISIS, et Al.

Nonetheless, the IDF has maintained the title of world middleweight terrorism champion by continuously slaughtering unarmed Arabs who cannot fight back, ... men, women and children who never attacked Israel.

ROFL

You dindu nuffin

You can't be taken seriously.

Try being truthful one in a thousand times, and maybe your credibility will come back

Stop attacking Jews, stop firing rockets and missiles, stop conducting terrorist attacks on schools, buses, and weddings.

Lying won't save you - but if you stop engaging in terrorism it just might.

The IDF is too cowardly to exact retribution on its only attacker Iran, so Israel bullies its Arab slaves who have never attacked Israel and who cannot fight back.

Your silly little lies are irrelevant, and Israel has kicked the shit out of Iran repeatedly, most recently 9 months ago where they destroyed dozens of military and munitions sites deep in Iran.

Totally false, but you bring up a great point about the extreme animosity that Israel has engendered throughout the region through the IDF's brazen ongoing terrorism. I can see how the entire region can grow irritated at being constantly attacked and killed just for being Arab.

You hate the Jews because they hold land that you view as Muslim land. Saladin overthrew the Byzantines in Syria, invaded Israel and you demand that the land belongs to your god Muhammad for all eternity.

Allahu Subpar.
 
They will eventually. Dumbasses ^ think that the US-backed genocidal Jewish assholes are going to be tolerated.

Haw, haw...................................haw.

uncensored.jpg



Read, you prosemitic dumbass;


Apologize to the forum for your scurrilous attempt to subvert history ^ ^

Your fellow Muslim says the Jews are committing genocide. How will you Muzzie Beasts establish your Caliphate if you are all dead?
 
I asked two questions:

1. What is this "paradox" you are assigning to me?
RQAA. You cannot claim Hamas exists and doesn't exist at the same time!
You cannot claim Hamas is funded by Iran and doesn't exist at the same time!

You cannot argue both sides of a paradox, IBD. It's irrational.
Yes, you have mentioned it many times,
Because you keep trying to argue both sides of these paradoxes.
and even ignored my two responses,
Blatant lie (denial). I answered you AGAIN just now.
so I have to confess to not understanding about what you are speaking.
Bullshit. I told you what the paradoxes were when you made them, again sometime later, and AGAIN just now.
It would appear that you have forgotten as well, or were simply mistaken initially.
Bullshit. You cannot clear your paradoxes by denying them, IBD.
2. When you use the buzzword "Hamas", to whom, exactly are you referring? The unarmed, broke and now extinct civilain administrators of Gaza, or one of Iran's militant terrorist proxies?
You are still locked in this paradox.
You support the IDF, the word's most active and aggressive terrorist organization, which is currently engaged in effecting a genocide of Arabs.
There is no genocide. They are not a terrorist organization.
Stay focused.
Random phrase ignored.
We're not talking about Jews.
Random phrase ignored.
We're talking about Israel ... which is a country.
Obvious.
This country is full of RACIST haters who continue to increase their support for Netanyahoo the more Arabs he kills.
Inversion fallacy.
The idea of the Israelites being God's chosen people only comes into play with Christians who are deathly afraid of going against Israel, and thus going against God, lest they spend eternity in the Lake of Fire.
Blatant lie (synthesis).
Hence the special pleading fallacy purveyed by Christians, i.e. even the worst atrocities are to be celebrated if Israel is the perpetrator.
Fallacy fallacy. Blatant lie (synthesis).

There is no genocide.
 
When you write "Hamas", to whom are you referring? Are you correctly referring to the unarmed, broke and now extinct civilian administrators of Gaza who never attacked Israel, or are you incorrectly referring to one or Iran's militant terrorist proxies who perpetrated the deadly Oct-7 attack on Israel? They are not the same, and you are obviously conflating them.
You are still locked in these paradoxes.
 
FTFY. I feel for you. I understand the pressure under which you must operate. I will never let others do my thinking for me. I refuse to make any special pleading fallacies for Israel.
Do not modify my post again.

Fallacy fallacy. No special pleading fallacy occurred.
Void argument fallacy. What 'pressure'?????
 
Your king is tipped. There is no reason anyone should lend you any credibility. You obviously intend to conflate two separate and unrelated organizations in order to justify your approval of genocide.

Hamas were unarmed administrators of Gaza who never attacked Israel, and now they are dead because the IDF specializes in killing unarmed/defenseless civilians by the thousands. You deliberately assign the characteristics of Al Qassam to Hamas just to confuse the issue and to make the genocide you support appear to be righteous. That makes you shitty and a liar.

giphy.webp
Assumption of victory fallacy. Argument of the Stone fallacy. You are still locked in this paradox. There is no genocide.
 
You are gibbering in your denial.
Argument of the Stone fallacy. You are still locked in this paradox.
In the future, don't be asking "why didn't anyone ever say anything?" or blame Israel for having decieved you; you were a willing complicit in the deceiving of yourself, being all too happy to deny everything Israel orders you to deny, and to conflate everything Israel so orders.
Random phrase ignored.
Your position is absurd,
Argument of the Stone fallacy.
and supports genocide in violation of the Convention against Genocide, and supports war crimes in violation of the IV Geneva Convention. Shitty position.
There is no genocide. Circular argument fallacy (fundamentalism).
I can answer all of your questions honestly.
Blatant lie (synthesis).
You are the one who is unable to answer even a single question honestly.
Inversion fallacy. Bulverism fallacy.
You took the easy, RACIST position of excusing a genocide that you find very entertaining.
Buzzword fallacies. Fallacy fallacies. There is no genocide.
 
Because that has been the nature of Iran's proxies that Iran formed. They do the Supreme Leader's bidding and no one else's. So no, it's not the "same shit."

I also notice that you fully intend to remain dishonest and conflate two separate and totally different groups, with your primary goal being not to get to the truth but to justify your support of the genocide of unarmed Arabs who never attacked Israel and who cannot defend themselves or fight back.


You are the one denying what the entire world, including Israel, understands as common knowledge. You have ZERO evidence to support your absurd conflation. Al Qassam is not Hamas. Hamas was just a group of unarmed civilian administrators and they are now dead. Al Qassam, on the other hand, is alive and kicking, and they have the hostages.

You simply HATE Arabs and want to see Israel eradicate them. Your lame attempts at justifying this aren't convincing in the least.


False. Hamas was a group of broke and unarmed civilian administrators. Now they are dead. You simply insist on conflating two separate groups. You have no argument.



False. Iran has been the only attacker of Israel since 1979. Iran has called all the shots. All of them.
Hamas and its formation predates the fall of Iran to the Ayatollahs not to mention that Hamas, and the Al Qassam brigades, predate that and can be traced back to the 70's.

You got nothing. You simply hate Israel and are an antisemite.

Show even one reasonable source that backs up your absurd position.
 
You are projecting your dishonesty.
Fallacy fallacy. Mantra 1e. Lame.
There are more than one hundred million conservatives and their children in the United States that the DNC would love to either imprison or eliminate altogether.
Random phrase. No apparent coherency
Let me know when you get around to something relevant.
Argument of the Stone fallacy.
You have the nerve to deny Israel's genocide, just because Israel is the perpetrator.
There is no genocide. Circular argument fallacy (fundamentalism).
Your position is that there is no genocide, and that the Arabs totally deserve the genocide that you deny is occurring.
Paradox. Irrational. You cannot argue both sides of a paradox. This makes your third one you've accumulated so far. You cannot claim there is no genocide and there is genocide at the same time!
Stay focused. We're talking about Israel's genocide of Arabs. The "Islamic world" is not being discussed.
There is no genocide. Circular argument fallacy (fundamentalism).
Since 1979, Iran has been the only attacker of Israel.
You are still locked in this paradox.
Nonetheless, the IDF has maintained the title of world middleweight terrorism champion by continuously slaughtering unarmed Arabs who cannot fight back, ... men, women and children who never attacked Israel.
Blatant lie (denial). Hamas attacked Israel. You are still locked in this paradox.
The IDF is too cowardly to exact retribution on its only attacker Iran, so Israel bullies its Arab slaves who have never attacked Israel and who cannot fight back.
Slavery was abolished in Israel in 1880, IBD.

Totally false, but you bring up a great point about the extreme animosity that Israel has engendered throughout the region through the IDF's brazen ongoing terrorism. I can see how the entire region can grow irritated at being constantly attacked and killed just for being Arab.
The IDF isn't a terrorist group, IBD. There is no genocide.
Buzzword fallacies. Circular argument fallacy (fundamentalism).
 
Because that has been the nature of Iran's proxies that Iran formed.
You are still locked in Paradox L.
They do the Supreme Leader's bidding and no one else's. So no, it's not the "same shit."
You are still locked in this paradox L.
I also notice that you fully intend to remain dishonest and conflate two separate and totally different groups, with your primary goal being not to get to the truth but to justify your support of the genocide of unarmed Arabs who never attacked Israel and who cannot defend themselves or fight back.
Fallacy fallacy. No conflation fallacy took place. No compositional error took place. He made a valid comparison.
You are the one denying what the entire world, including Israel, understands as common knowledge.
Omniscience fallacy. You don't get to speak for the entire world, IBD.
You have ZERO evidence to support your absurd conflation.
Fallacy fallacy. Argument of the Stone fallacy.
Al Qassam is not Hamas. Hamas was just a group of unarmed civilian administrators and they are now dead. Al Qassam, on the other hand, is alive and kicking, and they have the hostages.
You are still locked in Paradox K.
You simply HATE Arabs and want to see Israel eradicate them. Your lame attempts at justifying this aren't convincing in the least.
There is no genocide. Circular argument fallacy. You are still locked in paradox M.
False. Hamas was a group of broke and unarmed civilian administrators. Now they are dead. You simply insist on conflating two separate groups. You have no argument.
You are still locked in paradox K. Pivot fallacy. Argument of the Stone fallacy.
False. Iran has been the only attacker of Israel since 1979. Iran has called all the shots. All of them.
You are still locked in paradox K.

You cannot argue any of these three paradoxes, IBD. You have not cleared ANY of the 13 paradoxes you have accumulated so far. These three are no exception. You cannot clear a paradox by denying it.

You know I keep track of this stuff.
 
Last edited:
Hamas and its formation predates the fall of Iran to the Ayatollahs not to mention that Hamas, and the Al Qassam brigades, predate that and can be traced back to the 70's.

You got nothing. You simply hate Israel and are an antisemite.

Show even one reasonable source that backs up your absurd position.
Hamas was created in 1987. It is not part of Iran, though they often receive funding from Iran.

IBD is locked in three paradoxes (which are K, L, and M in my records) concerning this subject. He continues to try to argue both sides of each one. It's quite irrational.

These are:

K1) Hamas exists.
K2) Hamas does not exist.

L1) Hamas is funded by Iran.
L2) Hamas doesn't exist.

M1) There is genocide.
M2) There is no genocide.

Paradox M he made just a few posts ago.

You seem to be right. He is pretty much reduced to just fallacies and chanting his paradoxes now.
 
Hamas was created in 1987. It is not part of Iran, though they often receive funding from Iran.

IBD is locked in three paradoxes (which are K, L, and M in my records) concerning this subject. He continues to try to argue both sides of each one. It's quite irrational.

These are:

K1) Hamas exists.
K2) Hamas does not exist.

L1) Hamas is funded by Iran.
L2) Hamas doesn't exist.

M1) There is genocide.
M2) There is no genocide.

Paradox M he made just a few posts ago.

You seem to be right. He is pretty much reduced to just fallacies and chanting his paradoxes now.
It's more like this with IBDM.

Hamas existed but had no military power operating as a governmental bureaucracy.
Hamas's members are now dead, and it no longer effectively exists.

Military power in Gaza rests with Iran
The various factions like Al Qassam, Islamic Jihad, etc. are all controlled by Iran

His problem is:

Israel is negotiating with Hamas. There's no denying that.
If Hamas effectively doesn't exist how is this possible unless Israel can somehow speak to the dead.

Israel is not a war with Iran, yet it is fighting in IBDM's version Iranian forces directly controlled by Iran.

The various factions that are combatants don't get along. That too is well known. That's why there are various factions.
If Iran controls them, why don't the operate in lockstep with one mind?

IBDM claims a "genocide" is going on. But:

Hamas lies and has been caught lying red handed, repeatedly about casualty rates.
Hamas, et al., are documented and known to use human shields and see civilian casualties as desirable because they are "martyrs" and seen as a political tool to use against their enemy.
A genocide is a systematic extermination of a population, yet Israel regularly warns the population of Gaza where their forces will operate in advance and gives that population time to evacuate. Why would they do that if they wanted to exterminate that population?

Thus, Israel is negotiating with a non-entity to end warfare, while supposedly exterminating a population as part of that warfare that it regularly tries to get out of the combat zone(s) it is fighting in, and fighting entities that are under the control of a nation Israel isn't fighting a war with.

That's the contradictions IBDM faces.
 
You have lied repeatedly to cover for Hamas and other terrorists.
You won't even specify who you mean when you write "Hamas" because you know that conflation is your only chance at making your support for genocide sound somewhat plausible. You simply cannot engage on this topic without being totally dishonest. All you have is your misrepresentations of the positions of others.

No doubt - but utterly irrelevant to the genocide you promote against the Jews.
You're being totally dishonest. Nobody is threatening "the Jews" with any genocide. You are trying to distract attention away from your enthusiastic support for the IDF's active genocide against unarmed Arabs who never attacked Israel. Why are you so desperate to drag "the Jews" into this?

I deny Big Foot and the Loch Ness Monster as well
Thank you for the clarity. You put Israel's ethnic cleansing in the same category as fictional events. This means you deny all the overwhelming evidence placed before you to the contrary. You're living in denial. You are not rational.
 
RQAA. You cannot claim Hamas exists and doesn't exist at the same time!
I'm not claiming both of those. Hamas was a political party and Gaza's unarmed administrators. Now they are dead.

You cannot claim Hamas is funded by Iran and doesn't exist at the same time!
You are the one claiming that Hamas is funded by Iran. Hamas was broke when they were alive.

Blatant lie (denial). I answered you AGAIN just now.
You are EVADING. All of your arguments rely on the use of the empty buzzword "Hamas" so that you can conflate innocent, unarmed Arabs with militant Iranian terrorist proxies, and shift between semantics as convenient. Concealing your conflation makes it easier to make your support for genocide seem justified and righteous, and makes your special pleading fallacy appear cosmetically valid.

There is no genocide. They are not a terrorist organization.
... only when you dishonestly conflate dead civilian administrators with a separate, unaffiliated militant terrorist organization.

There is no genocide.
There is an egregious genocide, awash in war crimes, occurring that meets the definition ratified by both Israel and the US, as well as almost every other country. Your denial is irrelevant.
 
Back
Top