Constitutional Due Process would have prevented this unlawful act.

Rightys are arguing against due process. They are like Trump. Once he decides, the government should abide.
Trump does not want him back home to speak about the horrible treatment the El Salvador prisoners are getting. Trump does not care about these people. Over 75 percent have no criminal records. But Trump is showing he is the law. They have the rights that Trump permits.
Trumpys are on board with this abuse and torture.
 
At some point, once the SCOTUS has told them they have to "facilitate" his return (which they have), even Trump needs to just say, "oops" and fix the problem instead of trying to double down on a mistake, one that even they have said was a mistake.

Now we are getting to a level of obstinance that will simply allow this guy to stay once all is said and done, if they had just had the hearings the courts ruled they should have. You know, hearings to prove they are actually members of the newly minted terrorist organizations list, they likely could have deported him elsewhere as deporting him to El Salvador was not an option. Now, because they keep trying to avoid responsibility, it is likely this guy will be a guest of the US for a long time time come.
All the administration has to do is say they're making an effort. So, it takes say, three years nine months of trying...
 
All the administration has to do is say they're making an effort. So, it takes say, three years nine months of trying...
That would please you. However, once it was shown that Trump jailed innocent people, you would think he would want to rectify the mistake. He is like you. Fuck them let them rot in jail until you are forced to do the right thing. Putting innocent people in jail is a good thing to you and your right to jail innocents should be protected.
 
He hasnt been proven innocent
That is not true. He has a clean record . That would require proving guilt to jail, don't you think? He is innocent until proven guilty. I bet even you are familiar with that concept. You do not have to prove your innocence. They have to prove your guilt.
 
At some point, once the SCOTUS has told them they have to "facilitate" his return (which they have), even Trump needs to just say, "oops" and fix the problem instead of trying to double down on a mistake, one that even they have said was a mistake.
This guy assisted the US authorities with information about gangs. He is going to be dead soon, if he is not already dead. trump is just trying to run down the clock on his death.
 
That would please you. However, once it was shown that Trump jailed innocent people, you would think he would want to rectify the mistake. He is like you. Fuck them let them rot in jail until you are forced to do the right thing. Putting innocent people in jail is a good thing to you and your right to jail innocents should be protected.
I'm not a believer in the whole Better a guilty man go free than an innocent man go to jail... thing. Part of the problem with that is that if the guilty man goes free and commits more crimes, the course of action taken results in a worse outcome for society as a whole. A mistake with an innocent man--and the guy in this case isn't "innocent" he's guilty of illegal immigration among other things--is something that can be corrected in time but we can't fix crimes committed by the guilty man once they occur.

Putting the innocent in jail isn't a good thing either. But in this case an innocent man didn't go to jail, a guilty one did. What his appeal--taken only after it was apparent that Trump, unlike Biden, would deport him--is about is he knew if he was deported he'd end up in CECOT because of his court adjudicated connection to MS 13 and he was arguing that was so cruel as to be a reason to allow him to remain in the US.

At best, if he is returned to the US, he'll be put through the legal wringer and in the end get deported again. His only hope of staying in the US is to draw out his case until the next president comes into office and hope that person either ignores his case or is favorable to it.
 
I'm not a believer in the whole Better a guilty man go free than an innocent man go to jail... thing. Part of the problem with that is that if the guilty man goes free and commits more crimes, the course of action taken results in a worse outcome for society as a whole. A mistake with an innocent man--and the guy in this case isn't "innocent" he's guilty of illegal immigration among other things--is something that can be corrected in time but we can't fix crimes committed by the guilty man once they occur.

Putting the innocent in jail isn't a good thing either. But in this case an innocent man didn't go to jail, a guilty one did. What his appeal--taken only after it was apparent that Trump, unlike Biden, would deport him--is about is he knew if he was deported he'd end up in CECOT because of his court adjudicated connection to MS 13 and he was arguing that was so cruel as to be a reason to allow him to remain in the US.

At best, if he is returned to the US, he'll be put through the legal wringer and in the end get deported again. His only hope of staying in the US is to draw out his case until the next president comes into office and hope that person either ignores his case or is favorable to it.
In the US we hold that it is better to allow the guilty to walk free than to falsely imprison one innocent human. I would rather have the danger than let the government rape my rights.
 
In the US we hold that it is better to allow the guilty to walk free than to falsely imprison one innocent human. I would rather have the danger than let the government rape my rights.
I'd rather have the government give it their best try and occasionally make a mistake, than have more thugs and criminals on the street because their day in court didn't go absolutely perfectly.
 
If you want to see what is coming then look at Europe, which is now so overtly totalitarian that elections are cancelled on lies, those the overlords dont want to have power are not allowed to run in elections, and the grip of the brainwashings directed by The Wall Street Mafia is iron clad . As Dugin has long claimed this is part of the cancer of collapsing Western Liberalism....it is everywhere.

Now Dugin says that liberalism was always going to get here, and I dont agree with that, but I am sometimes wrong.
 
I'd rather have the government give it their best try and occasionally make a mistake, than have more thugs and criminals on the street because their day in court didn't go absolutely perfectly.
So you are against what makes America better . The big principles that we were founded on are inconvenient to your hate. Fuck a few innocent people because you belive that thugs get away with our system. This is where you show the figures you base that on.
 
All the administration has to do is say they're making an effort. So, it takes say, three years nine months of trying...
That would please you. He has more value to you in jail than being free. His freedom means nothing to you. There is a possibility that he is dead. That would bother a whole bunch of people. Not you, though.
 
So you are against what makes America better . The big principles that we were founded on are inconvenient to your hate. Fuck a few innocent people because you belive that thugs get away with our system. This is where you show the figures you base that on.
Letting criminals walk the streets because of a paperwork irregularity or other minor administrative mistake is something fools and lawyers do. Aside from that, our justice system as it stands is generally very fair and gives defendants quite a bit of chance to defend themselves.
 
Back
Top