Seven biggest drops…

[Into the Night]

I say we are about to have a huge breakthrough, on the level of the industrial revolution, or the neolithic agricultural revolution, and you say I am a pessimist? In all of human history, we have only twice had accelerations in growth, like the one I am predicting is going to happen, and you say things will be even better than what I say?

Let's discuss how great of a thing I am talking about, and then you can try to post how it would be far better. Before the neolithic agricultural revolution, world production doubled every 250,000 years(I admit that is a rough estimate). Before the industrial revolution, world production doubled every 900 years. After the industrial revolution, world production doubled every 15 years. So we can expect after this revolution for world production to double in weeks or months.

You say that is baselessly pessimistic, so tell me trump's tariffs will cause world production to double every day or so?

Technological singularity - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Void argument fallacy. Random phrases. No apparent coherency.

 

[Into the Night]

virology is science. FYI.

You deny Covid, you deny virology and you deny science.

Nope. It isn't. Virology is a field of study and not any theory of science.
Covid does not kill.

 

[Into the Night]

You deny Covid, you deny virology and you deny science.

I do not deny Covid19 or any variant of the Covid/SARS series of viruses.
No Covid variant kills.

 

[Into the Night]

yes. I'm also surrendering to irrational in favor of rational.

Paradox. Irrational.

 

[ZenMode]

Nope. It isn't. Virology is a field of study and not any theory of science.
Covid does not kill.

I didn't say virology was a theory of science.

Virology is the scientific study of viruses.

 

[ZenMode]

I do not deny Covid19 or any variant of the Covid/SARS series of viruses.
No Covid variant kills.

Link?

 

[Walt]

Mindlessly chanting what the Democrats tell you to chant won't work, Wally.

We will see if the economic signs that trump will cause a recession are right or not.

 

[Into the Night]

I didn't say virology was a theory of science.

Don't try to deny your own posts, Void.

Virology is the scientific study of viruses.

Paradox. Irrational. You cannot argue both sides of a paradox.

 

[Into the Night]

Link?

Attempted force of negative proof fallacy. Attempted proof by Holy Link.

 

[ZenMode]

Don't try to deny your own posts, Void.

Paradox. Irrational. You cannot argue both sides of a paradox.

You can't deny that virology is based in science.

because it is.

It's not a paradox. It's the continuous rewording and maneuvering around your retarded word games to get you to actually focus on the topic.

Unfortunately, you are wholly committed to retarded words games, to avoid the actual topics, so I have to remove myself from the back and forth to avoid wasting my time.

 

[ZenMode]

Attempted force of negative proof fallacy. Attempted proof by Holy Link.

Ok, then your claim is yet another "opinion stated as fact" and, therefore, meaningless.

 

[IBDaMann]

Neither science nor reality care about your politics.

Neither are people.

Sell crazy someplace else.

Neither science nor reality care about your denial of them both.

We're all stocked up here.

I'm fully aware that you are.

 

[ZenMode]

Neither are people.


Neither science nor reality care about your denial of them both.


I'm fully aware that you.

Let's see if you can do better than @Into the Night .....

What is your source for the claim that COVID doesn't kill?

I mean, SURELY you wouldn't expect any rational person to turn its back on the medical world and believe such an extraordinary claim just because you say it, right?

 

[IBDaMann]

Virology is the scientific study of viruses.

ZenMode Error: There is no such thing as a scientific study. There are only studies.

 

[IBDaMann]

What is your source for the claim that COVID doesn't kill?

You're back to asking for sources instead of asking why something is as it is. I'm not going to derail the subject of COVID's non-lethal nature to one of different websites and their contents.

What about COVID are you claiming causes it to kill? No sourcing is required.

I mean, SURELY you wouldn't expect any rational person to turn its back on the medical world

I mean, SURELY you wouldn't expect any rational adult to believe that you somehow speak for the medical world.

 

[ZenMode]

You're back to asking for sources instead of asking why something is as it is. I'm not going to derail the subject of COVID's non-lethal nature to one of different websites and their contents.

What about COVID are you claiming causes it to kill? No sourcing is required.


I mean, SURELY you wouldn't expect any rational adult to believe that you somehow speak for the medical world.

Saying "is as it is", without support is just more opinion presented as fact. Why should I believe your opinion of what "is"? You're saying "this is true because it's true". Circular reasoning, akin to religion.

"The Bible is the inerrant word of God."

How do you know that?

"Because the Bible says it is the inerrant word of God."

 

[IBDaMann]

Saying "is as it is", without support is just more opinion presented as fact.

Nope. You once again pivoted dishonestly. You were the one who, instead of asking why something was as it was, asked for me to cite someone else on the internet who happened to say the same thing. That is thread derailment. I have no intention of talking about the differing contents of different sites.

Do you have any rational basis for your WACKY belief that COVID somehow kills?

 

[Into the Night]

You can't deny that virology is based in science.

It isn't.

because it is.

No, it isn't

It's not a paradox.

You cannot clear your paradox by denying it!

It's the continuous rewording and maneuvering around your retarded word games to get you to actually focus on the topic.

No, it's a paradox.

Unfortunately, you are wholly committed to retarded words games, to avoid the actual topics, so I have to remove myself from the back and forth to avoid wasting my time.

Inversion fallacy. You can't blame me for your problem, Void.

 

[Into the Night]

Ok, then your claim is yet another "opinion stated as fact" and, therefore, meaningless.

Mantra 30a. I never claimed any such thing, Void.

 

[Into the Night]

Let's see if you can do better than @Into the Night .....

What is your source for the claim that COVID doesn't kill?

I mean, SURELY you wouldn't expect any rational person to turn its back on the medical world and believe such an extraordinary claim just because you say it, right?

Attempted force of negative proof fallacy.