Seven biggest drops…

NAot.gif
 
Well, you had two chance to support your claim
I don't have an affirmative claim. You have the affirmative claim that COVID kills and you can't support it.

To your comment about me not "supporting" ... that's for you to do, and I explained that you can post death certificates listing COVID as the cause of death for us to verify. I take it that you are new at this whole "logic" thing.
 
(Here we fo again!) According to who?
According to you.

Let's say I have a big pile of studies, and I need to separate those studies into two piles, 1) scientific studies, and 2) regular, non-scientific studies. So I confer with ZenMode; I tell him that I am looking at one of the studies and I ask him what about any given study tells me to put it in pile 1 or pile 2. What does ZenMode tell me?

(At this point in the conundrum, ZenMode blurts out "All the studies that have science are scientific studies" ... but ZenMode doesn't know what science is, and he thinks anything is science if it helps people believe his various Marxist religions ... so he jump to declaring "research" to be "science". Since all studies necessarily involve research, he declares that all studies are therefor scientific studies)

When everything is a scientific study, nothing is a scientific study.
 
I don't have an affirmative claim. You have the affirmative claim that COVID kills and you can't support it.

To your comment about me not "supporting" ... that's for you to do, and I explained that you can post death certificates listing COVID as the cause of death for us to verify. I take it that you are new at this whole "logic" thing.
I'm not a virologist and neither are you. In that situation, I get my information from people who are more knowledgeable than I am. Those people, at least the ones that I have read, clearly state that the COVID virus is deadly..

What is your source for your claim that it is not deadly?
 
According to you.

Let's say I have a big pile of studies, and I need to separate those studies into two piles, 1) scientific studies, and 2) regular, non-scientific studies. So I confer with ZenMode; I tell him that I am looking at one of the studies and I ask him what about any given study tells me to put it in pile 1 or pile 2. What does ZenMode tell me?

(At this point in the conundrum, ZenMode blurts out "All the studies that have science are scientific studies" ... but ZenMode doesn't know what science is, and he thinks anything is science if it helps people believe his various Marxist religions ... so he jump to declaring "research" to be "science". Since all studies necessarily involve research, he declares that all studies are therefor scientific studies)

When everything is a scientific study, nothing is a scientific study.
So, your answer to the question of "who" is a three paragraph nonsensical diatribe that never answers the question.

giphy.gif


NAot.gif
 
You, like ITN, had your chance to defend your claim and you didn't. Moving on.....
You realized that your affirmative assertion, i.e. that COVID somehow kills, was utterly stupid and you opted to tip your king. Now you are fleeing to the hills.....

giphy.gif


You are the one who affirmatively asserts that COVID kills. You cannot produce a single death certificate listing COVID as the cause of death. Yes, you should be embarrassed. At least we can move on now.
 
What is and is not a crash can be subjective, but we are down 18%, so it is safe to say we are having crashes, and entering a bear market. It is almost certain that we will be down 20%.

IBD can make all the excuses he wants, but his talking is not changing the facts. trump is crashing the markets, and the markets crashing is just a symptom of the greater damage trump is doing to the economy.


Once again, within an hour of trump speaking, America had lost $2 trillion in investment. That is a failure on a level no one has seen before. Investment is definitely pouring, but IBD got the direction wrong.


I am paying a lot of attention, because I am making a lot of money off these crashes.


It is safe to say that my correct analysis is making money.

This hasn't aged well.
 
I'm not a virologist
So you are not an expert. Gotit. Your wild claims are just that.
and neither are you.
He doesn't have to be.
In that situation, I get my information from people who are more knowledgeable than I am.
You haven't provided any references yet. You are not a virologist, so you can't even understand such an 'expert' to see if they are full of hooey or not.
Those people, at least the ones that I have read, clearly state that the COVID virus is deadly..
Void reference fallacy. Covid does not kill.
What is your source for your claim that it is not deadly?
RQAA. Attempted force of negative proof fallacy.
 
Back
Top