Seems someone ^ doesn’t understand the meaning of the word “considering”bwahahaha
this is what being a retard looks like in digital forum
"she did pretty well" bwahahahahaha
Seems someone ^ doesn’t understand the meaning of the word “considering”bwahahaha
this is what being a retard looks like in digital forum
"she did pretty well" bwahahahahaha
Open your ears jackass
And how does one “open their ears” on a one line forum? ClassicOpen your ears jackass
considering the money advantage and how the media propped her up she failed. she is a laughingstockSeems someone ^ doesn’t understand the meaning of the word “considering”
She didn’t have any sugar daddies forking over $250 million, and the media didn’t cover her anymore than they did Trump, and she did not have any media entity openly campaigning for her as Trump did the right wing mediaconsidering the money advantage and how the media propped her up she failed. she is a laughingstock
sorry you didn't get the memo. I think I know why. we are also laughing at you
She didn’t have any sugar daddies forking over $250 million, and the media didn’t cover her anymore than they did Trump, and she did not have any media entity openly campaigning for her as Trump did the right wing media
As said, and the results prove it, with only three months to campaign she still stopped Trump, who had four years to plan, from getting a majority of Americans to vote for him
Looks like Trump is out to prevent another election.She also bested him in their one debate, pretty easily.
It was just a change election, particularly w/ inflation being such a nagging issue. Not much more to read into it beyond that. '26 is likely to be another change election.
your delusion makes me laughShe didn’t have any sugar daddies forking over $250 million, and the media didn’t cover her anymore than they did Trump, and she did not have any media entity openly campaigning for her as Trump did the right wing media
As said, and the results prove it, with only three months to campaign she still stopped Trump, who had four years to plan, from getting a majority of Americans to vote for him
If you can't figure out the meaning of that then it certainly applies.And how does one “open their ears” on a one line forum? Classic
This delusional comment is exactly why she lost.She didn’t have any sugar daddies forking over $250 million, and the media didn’t cover her anymore than they did Trump, and she did not have any media entity openly campaigning for her as Trump did the right wing media
As said, and the results prove it, with only three months to campaign she still stopped Trump, who had four years to plan, from getting a majority of Americans to vote for him
Kamala Harris was a horrible candidate.This delusional comment is exactly why she lost.
She had nearly 2 Billion to spend in 3 months and somehow she did it.
She had all networks except Fox as full time campaign TV.
She had nearly all of Hollywood doing everything they could.
She had the big bad Obama endorsement and let's not forget the biggest of all endorsements Oprah.
She had nearly all the universities in full time campaign mode.
Actually, I'm with you and want to join you in support for Kamala Harris to take down the next Republican up for the throne, even Donald Trump. LOL She'll do much better with even more money and more time to get her grove, she'll be great, and definitely will win.
We agree, she really is, and apparently nobody's told her yet.Kamala Harris was a horrible candidate.
She thinks calling Trump "weird" is leadership!We agree, she really is, and apparently nobody's told her yet.
And she still lacked the big sugar daddy that Donny hadThis delusional comment is exactly why she lost.
She had nearly 2 Billion to spend in 3 months and somehow she did it.
She had all networks except Fox as full time campaign TV.
She had nearly all of Hollywood doing everything they could.
She had the big bad Obama endorsement and let's not forget the biggest of all endorsements Oprah.
She had nearly all the universities in full time campaign mode.
Actually, I'm with you and want to join you in support for Kamala Harris to take down the next Republican up for the throne, even Donald Trump. LOL She'll do much better with even more money and more time to get her grove, she'll be great, and definitely will win.
Harris will go down as easily the worst Democratic candidate.And she still lacked the big sugar daddy that Donny had
No, networks covered her, right wing media openly campaigned for Trump, even appeared with him at events
“nearly all,” big name supporters don’t equate to “nearly all”
Obama endorsed all Democrats
What the hell does Universities have to do with campaigns
Harris won’t be the nominee in 2028, and if you were big enough to acknowledge the truth, you’d admit she did a credible with only 100 days
Nothing to figure outIf you can't figure out the meaning of that then it certainly applies.
Thanks Seanyour delusion makes me laugh
Scamala is the worst politician you will ever vote for. the more we got to know her, the more of a joke she became
Bullshit. You conservatives are the champions of Goebbels.You people are always without fail accusing others of the exact reprehensible things you're doing.
The lack of self awareness you exhibit is stunning.
The difference is I'm right and you're wrong again. Arguing with a leftist is like smelling a fart when no one is there but the two of you. Everyone knows no matter who starts lying.Bullshit. You conservatives are the champions of Goebbels.
Look in a mirror if you are seeking to be stunned by a lack of self-awareness.
Comparing immigrant kids to MS-13. Nice.