G
The Stallion has been gelded.
Time to go to the knacker's yard.
I had assumed this thread was about Legion's ignored sockpuppets.......
That's because you're stupid. It's about what happened as a result of conservative hate. There's a liberal in this coffin:
The tragedy in Norway happened because of one man's hatred and lunacy. Your attempt to hang it on all conservatives is disgusting. I would be willing to bet you were one of those claiming Loughner was a Tea Party member.
Please, cite your evidence that I've attempted "to hang it on all conservatives".
When you can't, we both know you won't admit you are wrong.
What I have done - successfully - is point out that Anders Breivik is a self-described Christian who has espoused beliefs shared by many Teabaggers.
If you care to try to refute the facts, by all means, do.
Oh please. You cannot possibly deny it. The easiest proof is "It's about what happened as a result of conservative hate". No qualifier that it is only some or a few, you labeled the hate as belonging to all conservatives.
I can easily deny it, since it's untrue. The word "all" does not appear in my thread title. You lied.
Your failure to produce any evidence of your false claim means you lose.
You're not the first idiot to attempt to change what I've said because you desperately want to deny the fact that a conservative Christian committed a monstrous crime, and you won't be the last.
Please show me where I have denied that a christian conservative committed a monstrous crime? I am not attempting to change what you said. But what you said was not that a few or some conservative's hatred led to the murders. You blatantly posted that it was "conservative hatred", without any sort of limitation or qualifier.
Are you denying that you've argued that Breivik should not be described as "Christian"?
Would you require that a description of the 9/11 murderers include a numeric modifier, or are you content to see "Islamic/Muslim terrorist"?
Where's your proof that I blamed conservatives for Jared Lee Loughner's attack - which you inferred earlier?
Did I?
Can you see the difference between blaming "conservative hate" and "Islamic/Muslim terrorist"?
In one it includes all conservatives. In the other it is only those muslims who are terrorists.
Reread what I said. I didn't say for sure you did anything. When a sentence starts with "I bet..." it means I am guessing. But based on the plethora of posts you have made concerning this tragedy, I feel pretty comfortable with my assumption.
Did you? Is Breivik is a Christian? Yes, or no?
Is conservative hate to blame? Is there a difference between "conservative hate" and "Muslim hate"? Yes, or no?
How so?
So your insinuation was substance-less. I win again.
I don't know. He professes to be. But his actions don't fit with my views of our faith. Whether he is or not is not particularly relevant. Whether there is a difference between conservative hate and muslim hate is irrelevant to this discussion. Because in one statement it just talks about conservatives, while in the other it limits the discussion to muslims who are terrorists. While one would apply to all conservatives, the other would not apply to muslims who are not terrorists or terrorists who are not muslim. There is no win. I made a statement that was nothing more than me guessing what you would have posted just after a different tragedy. And I based it on my observations of your posts after the Norway murders. I am not trying to prove anything, and you cannot prove what you didn't do. So there is no win involved.
There is no win for you.
If you were the one proclaiming who is the winner, there is no win for anyone. If I accepted your proclamations that I lost, I would indeed be a loser. What I posted is accurate.