A New NBC News Poll Shows a Growing Number of Republicans Identifying with MAGA Movement

They also didn’t find him guilty of gang connections, in fact, the only evidence again was the testimony of a third party

Why do keep arguing a position that Bondi herself invalidated when the Administration admitted it was a mistake
the arresting office is not a third party - but it was testimony under oath


same with how he abuses women - a women said that under threat of perjury.


and you shit stains are again why we are united
 
What 'Imperial Presidency', anchovies??????? :rofl2:
In the right’s view, as especially expounded by Billy Barr in defending Trump, that the U.S. presidency should be characterized by greater power than the Constitution allows, an extension on Bush’s earlier Unitarian theory

Amazing what MAGA doesn’t even know about their own party
 
the arresting office is not a third party - but it was testimony under oath


same with how he abuses women - a women said that under threat of perjury.


and you shit stains are again why we are united
Testimony that was weighed and decided not strong enough to change the decision, and validated by the fact the Trump Administration had the option to pursue the case and did not. In other words, he was never proven to be a gang member

And again, it is not about the guy, he probably is a shitbag, regardless, it is about a person, shitbag or not, who was deprived of his Constitutional rights, simple fact, you are arguing the Constitution doesn’t matter
 
Testimony that was weighed and decided not strong enough to change the decision, and validated by the fact the Trump Administration had the option to pursue the case and did not. In other words, he was never proven to be a gang member
you are confused - the decision was that he could be removed from this country.

and again - this is why we can ignore those areas we don't align

you are aligned with scum - we are aligned against scum
 
Being Loyal to, Liking, Following, and Voting for a President are all different, independent things.


I do not like Bush1or2, Obama, or Biden, but I was Loyal and followed all three. I voted for someone else... I didn't give those three vocal support, I gave my political support to other candidates, but I followed their duly pass laws and executive orders. I still follow a bunch of laws passed by The Bushes and Obama, particularly the ACA. I would support overturning the ACA, but until it is legally removed, it remains the law.



I support and follow the Congress Legally passed and Presidential signed current Immigration Laws, Obama, Biden, and most the Democrats do and did not.
 
you are confused - the decision was that he could be removed from this country.

and again - this is why we can ignore those areas we don't align

you are aligned with scum - we are aligned against scum
No it was not, the decision did not show him to be a gang member and that he shouldn’t be deported because of possible dangers to him if he were, it never said he could be removed (https://time.com/7278832/trump-caved-on-abrego-garcia-deportation-move-in-2019/)/). And the Trump Administration did not appeal the decision

Again, Trump’s own AG has admitted deporting him was a mistake, you are arguing that the Constitution doesn’t count, that it is meaningless

And, as I said, I don’t give a rat’s ass about they guy except that his case proves a disregard of the Constitution by Trump and his Administration, such things used to bother Republicans
 
Being Loyal to, Liking, Following, and Voting for a President are all different, independent things.


I do not like Bush1or2, Obama, or Biden, but I was Loyal and followed all three. I voted for someone else... I didn't give those three vocal support, I gave my political support to other candidates, but I followed their duly pass laws and executive orders. I still follow a bunch of laws passed by The Bushes and Obama, particularly the ACA. I would support overturning the ACA, but until it is legally removed, it remains the law.



I support and follow the Congress Legally passed and Presidential signed current Immigration Laws, Obama, Biden, and most the Democrats do and did not.
Confusing, so are you saying you support what the President does even if that President disregards the Constitution?
 
What 'carnage', Red??????
What carnage? At least once a week, a plane is falling out the air. At least once every 2 days the Clown is imposing some exective order that catches everybody off guard, you don't know if your coming or going...eggs are still 6.99 a dozen at Ralphs and Krogers, Orange Juice still 8 bucks a gallon, seniors don't know what the fuck he's gonna do with Medicare and Medicaid, teen violence at a all time high of which guns dominate the body counts, something this man ran on, I could give two fucks about deporting illegals, but who's next? White motherfuckers are running around the country with their Trump flags and Klan gear, just waiting to start some shit this summer of which all ppl of color are on notice and ready....what Carnage??? You have to be a white man with nothing to lose in the stock market, else you wouldn't read so damn stupid
 
In the right’s view, as especially expounded by Billy Barr in defending Trump, that the U.S. presidency should be characterized by greater power than the Constitution allows, an extension on Bush’s earlier Unitarian theory

Amazing what MAGA doesn’t even know about their own party
DON'T TRY TO HIDE BEHIND THE CONSTITUTION YOU DESPISE, ANCHOVIES!

Trump has not violated any part of the Constitution.
 
Testimony that was weighed and decided not strong enough to change the decision, and validated by the fact the Trump Administration had the option to pursue the case and did not. In other words, he was never proven to be a gang member
Yes he was.
And again, it is not about the guy, he probably is a shitbag, regardless, it is about a person, shitbag or not, who was deprived of his Constitutional rights, simple fact, you are arguing the Constitution doesn’t matter
DON'T TRY TO HIDE BEHIND THE CONSTITUTION YOU DESPISE, ANCHOVIES!

Rights don't come from a piece of paper. Illegal aliens have NO right to stay in the United States. He broke the law and is subject to deportation.
 
Confusing, so are you saying you support what the President does even if that President disregards the Constitution?


No. We tried to have the ACA overturned as unconstitutional. We failed. Mostly because Justice Roberts Betrayed America. I do not give my vocal support to the ACA, but I follow it. Because the American Process made it LAW.


I still think the ACA is wrong, and should be torn down. But it IS Legal. I follow the Law.

-
 
I agree with you. There are no factions in the Republican Party who disagree with trump on anything substantive. Isn't it great to have agreement?

So now that we know that the Republican Party is 100% the party of trump, and that trump is responsible for whatever happens next, we can also give credit(or blame) to the entire Republican Party for what happens next.

Again, isn't it great to have agreement?
Um…Never Right Walter, why would we have elected President Trump if we disagreed with him on anything substantive?

As to agreement with you, I don’t think we agree on anything substantive.

You are just wrong too often, Never Right Walter.
 
No. We tried to have the ACA overturned as unconstitutional. We failed. Mostly because Justice Roberts Betrayed America. I do not give my vocal support to the ACA, but I follow it. Because the American Process made it LAW.


I still think the ACA is wrong, and should be torn down. But it IS Legal. I follow the Law.

-
The ACA was legislation, this is a Presidential act, and the Supreme Court didn’t over rule the lower Court’s ruling, huge difference
 
More bovine bullshit from the whiny little brainless forum bullshiter.

If you had any self-awareness and an IQ above room temperature, you would be embarrassed.
dumbass-dumb.gif
You trigger very easily low grade. Many posts, one right after another to address one post
 
DON'T TRY TO HIDE BEHIND THE CONSTITUTION YOU DESPISE, ANCHOVIES!

Trump has not violated any part of the Constitution.
In other words, “pidgin” didn’t like the factual answer he got so now he’s trying to deflect with generalization

Waste of time exchanging with one who can’t even address what he claims

NEXT
 
the arresting office is not a third party - but it was testimony under oath


same with how he abuses women - a women said that under threat of perjury.


and you shit stains are again why we are united
So, every man guilty of domestic abuse should be put in an El Salvador prison for life? How about the women guilty of domestic abuse?
You Trumplestilskins cannot say anything negative about Trump. You will lose your Maggot membership card and decoder ring. You have to back anything and everything he does. That is what unites you.
Trump is saying egg prices are too low. He plays opposites instead of addressing a subject. Now you guys have to say egg prices are too low, and you will.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top