A point to ponder concerning Romney.

bravo said:

So, one mans belief in his fairies is preferred to another mans belief in his fairies ?....interesting.
Click to expand...

Not at all. I am saying and I have said before that certain beliefs and superstitions are ingrained in our culture and are very very difficult to ignore. Obama's belief in fairies is backed by nearly 2000 years of western culture. That culture has given us, or enabled, some of the finest advances man has experienced. Obama's beliefs, if genuinely held, are certainly equally as mad as Romney's but Obama has something of an excuse. It is also quite likely that he, like 534 of your congressmen, feels it prudent, in the face of American insanity, to 'go along' with the faith idea.

Romney has no such logic to support his stance. His religion, which I might remind you is overtly racist, denies science and denies logic.

Anyway you won't be voting for Romney for his religion nor will you vote for him because of his policies.
You will vote for him because he is white. Deny it as much as you like. If you had an ounce of decency and political understanding you could not vote for Romney.
 
bravo said:
Logically then....you would prefer a known failure because he has a degree of education.....?
Click to expand...



Who's the failure? After one hundred years Obama finally got a health care plan in place. Talk of government involvement in health care started wayyyyy back in 1912. Hard to believe, huh? Not some gazillionaire or dude from an old, moneyed family with a "JR" after his name but a regular guy from Kenya, oops, Hawaii. :D Yes, I do prefer such a person compared to someone who believes a convicted felon was some prophet. Of course, prophet or profit is what it's all about, isn't it? After all, according to his religious beliefs God's people are wealthy. The poor are not only lazy and takers but, by definition, not God's people. Why would someone with such beliefs want to help the poor and needy? Are we to believe Romney or anyone else would deliberately go against their deeply held beliefs and those beliefs are deeply held to the point of donating one million dollars to the church that preaches such beliefs. That's who you prefer?
 
PostmodernProphet said:
do you really think anyone requires proof that Christianity does not teach stoning anyone to death?......I expect you're the only one here stupid enough to believe they do.....it is not necessary to prove that fucking idiots are fucking idiots when they wear placards saying "I am a fucking idiot" around their neck......
Click to expand...


Then why do you wear the placard? :dunno:
 
apple0154 said:
Who's the failure? After one hundred years Obama finally got a health care plan in place. Talk of government involvement in health care started wayyyyy back in 1912. Hard to believe, huh? Not some gazillionaire or dude from an old, moneyed family with a "JR" after his name but a regular guy from Kenya, oops, Hawaii. :D Yes, I do prefer such a person compared to someone who believes a convicted felon was some prophet. Of course, prophet or profit is what it's all about, isn't it? After all, according to his religious beliefs God's people are wealthy. The poor are not only lazy and takers but, by definition, not God's people. Why would someone with such beliefs want to help the poor and needy? Are we to believe Romney or anyone else would deliberately go against their deeply held beliefs and those beliefs are deeply held to the point of donating one million dollars to the church that preaches such beliefs. That's who you prefer?
Click to expand...


Ahhhh yes.....you're right....Socialism has been trying to get its ugly nose under the good ole USA tent since the birth of the country....of course
you would see that as an Obama success....his being will on his way to bringing down the whole country must
really make you ecstatic.
And I see you too have a hate for Mormons too, certainly they're not "Gods People"

Well, forgive me.....I almost forget who I was talking to here and mistook you for a rational person.....
 
bravo said:
Ahhhh yes.....you're right....Socialism has been trying to get its ugly nose under the good ole USA tent since the birth of the country....of course
you would see that as an Obama success....his being will on his way to bringing down the whole country must
really make you ecstatic.
And I see you too have a hate for Mormons too, certainly they're not "Gods People"

Well, forgive me.....I almost forget who I was talking to here and mistook you for a rational person.....
Click to expand...

Government medical care bringing down the country? :lol: Maybe bringing UP the country to 21st century standards.

As for hating Mormons I hate no one. As for organized religions, in general, I avoid them and the louder a person professes their belief in them the further from those folks I try to get. Between personal experience and reading/hearing about prominent members of various religions they are not a group with whom I wish to be associated. That said, it does not mean I do not believe in a higher power, "power" being the key word.
 
apple0154 said:
Oh, I'm sure you're capable of embarrassing yourself further. It was established you're a liar on June 4, 2012. "The womb Nazis are at it again" thread. Specifically Post #43.

It doesn't surprise me anymore.
Click to expand...

lol....you mean that thread where you embarrassed yourself by thinking we were still living in the 1820s?.....I do agree that thread was a new low for you.....
 
PostmodernProphet said:
lol....you mean that thread where you embarrassed yourself by thinking we were still living in the 1820s?.....I do agree that thread was a new low for you.....
Click to expand...

While your definition is wildly skewed, yep, that's the thread. The one where you wrote, "no law has ever been passed and no law will ever be passed and no law will ever be proposed to be passed" except the specific law to which you were referring was proposed and passed. After it being brought to your attention rather than acknowledge your ignorance you compounded it by making excuses, as is currently evident, elevating it to a lie. Rather then being man enough to apologize to \\((\))// you and your other loser friends attack \\((\))//'s debating style.

It's rather comical. :lol:
 
PostmodernProphet said:
/giggles......1820......the last time you got out......
Click to expand...

Talking about getting out maybe it's time you got out and learned something. Or even googled instead of having \\((\))// constantly slapping your ass. I don't how you can refer to yourself as a "prophet" when your ignorance of history is abysmal. :palm:
 
apple0154 said:
Talking about getting out maybe it's time you got out and learned something. Or even googled instead of having \\((\))// constantly slapping your ass. I don't how you can refer to yourself as a "prophet" when your ignorance of history is abysmal. :palm:
Click to expand...

ahem.... er ... history tends not to be what prophets are about. :)
 
apple0154 said:
Talking about getting out maybe it's time you got out and learned something. Or even googled instead of having \\((\))// constantly slapping your ass. I don't how you can refer to yourself as a "prophet" when your ignorance of history is abysmal. :palm:
Click to expand...

/grins.....your problem came from confusing the past with the future.....
 
apple0154 said:
One is unable to predict the future without knowing the past. That was my point.

(And some folks wonder why I post detailed explanations.)
Click to expand...

One is unable to predict the future, period. One can guess or extrapolate, given runes, seer stones, bent sticks or seaweed.

On another point. Everytime anyone uses the word 'folks' I get two picture in my tiny mind. One is Hitler and 'volk' the other is bush. Can't we just say 'people', that's what we are after all? Oh I know, I know, it's American ...
 
Lowaicue said:
One is unable to predict the future, period. One can guess or extrapolate, given runes, seer stones, bent sticks or seaweed.
Click to expand...

Of course people can predict the future. The weather gal can tell us if it's going to rain tomorrow. :)

On another point. Everytime anyone uses the word 'folks' I get two picture in my tiny mind. One is Hitler and 'volk' the other is bush. Can't we just say 'people', that's what we are after all? Oh I know, I know, it's American ...
Click to expand...

"Folks" has a more friendly ring to it.
 
apple0154 said:
Of course people can predict the future. The weather gal can tell us if it's going to rain tomorrow. :)



"Folks" has a more friendly ring to it.
Click to expand...

But it would appear that most Americans hate all other Americans!

The weather girl certainly can tell usf it's going to rain tomorrow, but she is not always right!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top