I would venture to say, blind people are least likely to commit vehicular homicide while drinking and driving. But what exactly does this prove?
How is that stupid? It's essentially the same strawman argument. Waterhead says fewer Atheists get divorced, and I say fewer blind people kill others while drinking and driving.
What is truly "ridiculously stupid" is some loud-mouth punk making accusations without articulating any basis for them. Also, idiots who make up senseless monikers designed to proclaim how smart they are.