Ban the consumption of Pork!

[Jarod]

Many religens find it offensive that people eat animals with hoves. For the American Government to condone eating such creachers by keeping the consumption of pork legal is violative of the right to free exersize of religen.

 

[Kamala Trump]

Ummm. Nobody is forced to eat pork.

 

[Jarod]

Just like nobody is forced to get married to someone of the same sex.

 

[Kamala Trump]

My favority protein is free-range monkey.

 

[Cancel3]

I demand my constitutional right to bacon! And let the faggots stay single! Their marriage would make my marriage a mockery.

 

[Kamala Trump]

Throw another Houhynym on the barbie.

 

[Jarod]

I am just trying to illistrate how silly Dixie's arguments are.

 

[Kamala Trump]

I am just trying to illistrate how silly Dixie's arguments are.

Shut up, spock, lest I round out your deformed ears with my pocket knife.

 

[Jarod]

Shut up, spock, lest I round out your deformed ears with my pocket knife.

Dixie will never comment because he has been shown to be a fool, once again!

 

[KingCondanomation]

If you really wanted to ban "pork" in congress, you should have supported McCain who was the strongest anti-pork member in the senate.

 

[Dixie - In Memoriam]

JARHEAD:

"RELIGEN" IS SPELLED "RELIGION!"

I have posted this in big bold red letters because you apparently haven't noticed your atrocious spelling error, despite the fact the word has been correctly spelled thousands of times in response to your idiocy.

 

[Jarod]

Well lets ban working on Sundays....

Some religens believe the defination of Sunday or Sabbeth is necessarly a day of rest. The fact that some people choose to work on sundays, according to Dixie logic, would prohibit the free exersize of the religen of those who believe Sunday is defined by being a day of rest, so noone should be allowed to work on Sundays, persuant to the First Amendment.

 

[Jarod]

JARHEAD:

"RELIGEN" IS SPELLED "RELIGION!"

I have posted this in big bold red letters because you apparently haven't noticed your atrocious spelling error, despite the fact the word has been correctly spelled thousands of times in response to your idiocy.

See here.... When he has lost the last thing left for him to do is attack my abiility to spell!

I really enjoy how much my poor spelling upsets you.

 

[Dixie - In Memoriam]

Well lets ban working on Sundays....

Some religens believe the defination of Sunday or Sabbeth is necessarly a day of rest. The fact that some people choose to work on sundays, according to Dixie logic, would prohibit the free exersize of the religen of those who believe Sunday is defined by being a day of rest, so noone should be allowed to work on Sundays, persuant to the First Amendment.

In both of your examples, you are talking about "banning" things, the issue of "gay marriage" is ALLOWING something. So your examples are not an example of my logic whatsoever, and YOU are the idiot here. Now, go study your third-grade speller!

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

Just like nobody is forced to get married to someone of the same sex.

do you support incest marriage?

 

[Jarod]

In both of your examples, you are talking about "banning" things, the issue of "gay marriage" is ALLOWING something. So your examples are not an example of my logic whatsoever, and YOU are the idiot here. Now, go study your third-grade speller!

You see, some states allow gay marriage, thus it would be banning it, if you change that law. The difference between allowing it and banning it is the same thing for the purpose of our conversation. If you allow more freedom, you allow more people to participitate in a religous ceramony, you are not prohibiting anyone from freely exersizing there own religen.

 

[Kamala Trump]

In both of your examples, you are talking about "banning" things, the issue of "gay marriage" is ALLOWING something. So your examples are not an example of my logic whatsoever, and YOU are the idiot here. Now, go study your third-grade speller!

But the issue of gay marriage is also about BANNING gay marriage.

I can't believe you tried to get away with this. You are a hack. A slightly inventive and amusing hack.

 

[Jarod]

Okay, lets change my example to allowing.... Lets allow the states to prohibit working on Sundays, lets allow Jews to prohibit others from eating pork.

 

[Kamala Trump]

Okay, lets change my example to allowing.... Lets allow the states to prohibit working on Sundays, lets allow Jews to prohibit others from eating pork.

ok. But must a jew stop others from eating pork in person? That would make it more fun.


"Hey you people over there, I command you to stop eating pork"

 

[Dixie - In Memoriam]

You see, some states allow gay marriage, thus it would be banning it, if you change that law. The difference between allowing it and banning it is the same thing for the purpose of our conversation. If you allow more freedom, you allow more people to participitate in a religous ceramony, you are not prohibiting anyone from freely exersizing there own religen.

There is a very distinct different between "banning" something and not allowing it in the first place. Marriage is traditionally the (largely religious) ceremonial union between a man and a woman. You are seeking to ALLOW something, not to BAN something.

As I said in the other thread, the more appropriate example would be, advocating government mandate that all kosher food include pork or pork byproducts. Allowing such a regulation, would be a direct contradiction of religious practice and exercise. Now, anyone can legally consume kosher food, you don't have to be Jewish, but you can't mandate kosher food include pork, because that violates the 'religious sanctity' of kosher food. It doesn't matter how many people would like to eat kosher pork ribs, it's an oxymoron! Just like "gay marriage" is an oxymoron. MORON!