WTF does this have to do with the topic halfwit? Trump couldn't get his wall done because of Democrats dumbass.
This isn't about court reform you willful moron, it's about an attempted power grab by Democrats. I wish you had a brain. Really I do.
Biden endorses Supreme Court reforms, amendment to limit immunity
- Thread starter Hume
- Start date
WTF does this have to do with the topic halfwit? Trump couldn't get his wall done because of Democrats dumbass.
This isn't about court reform you willful moron, it's about an attempted power grab by Democrats. I wish you had a brain. Really I do.
It's DOA at the House per Speaker Johnson.
Kagan is one of the most partisan and least qualified to be anywhere near the court. But she's the perfect DEI hire.Last week Justice Elena Kagan called for the court to strengthen the ethics code it introduced in 2023 by adding a way to enforce it. That code was introduced after a spate of scandals involving rightwing justices on the court: Clarence Thomas was found to have accepted vacations and travel from a Republican mega-donor, while Samuel Alito flew on a private jet owned by an influential billionaire on the way to a fishing trip.
Biden calls for supreme court reforms including 18-year justice term limits
President also says presidential immunity for crimes should be removed and ethics rules for justices should be stricterwww.theguardian.com
Indeed. Court Justices should not have wealthy friends who have nothing before the court in order to satisfy the shrill stupidity of leftist morons like you.
Yakuda
Verified User
Seems right
No it doesn’t, today’s Court proves it, Justice’s are held to zero accountability, they could literally be bought by special interests with no penalties, not what the Founders had in mind by establishing an Judicial Branch
As was Mexico paying for a Wall
Yakuda
Verified User
As I said you dont like it. Its been like this for 200 years but suddenly the court needs "reform". Please Im begging you to stop talking to everyone as if they are as stupid as a leftist.
Yakuda
Verified User
I asked you before to show where I claimed that wasnt virtue signaling. Im still waiting. And if trump did it then its ok for you leftist nitwits to do it? Again stop talking to people as if they are as stupid as a leftists.
Yeah, holding the Supreme Court to an enforceable code of ethics is “stupid to the extreme,” appears ^ doesn’t approve of the Founders notions of checks and balances
No President being above the law was also established for 200+ years and yet that precedent didn’t stop this Court
No I don’t like the sugar daddy reality of the current Court, but that is not the point, rather that, like all Courts in America including other Federal Courts, the Supreme Court should be held to an enforceable code of ethics, what is the arguement for them not having one
Yakuda
Verified User
It's just like the electoral college with you people. You want to get rid of it because it results in democrats losing. You can drone on all you like but not everyone is as stupid as a leftist
It was a simple question, “what is the arguement for them not having” an enforceable code of ethics and/or term limits?
Has nothing to do with the electoral college or Democrats”losing,” just an invitation for you to present an opposing argument, which obviously you can not
Your done here, nothing to offer
Fuck you asshole. You called for the killing of your political opponent so fuck you.
Some times virtues need to be signaled.
Poor anchovies,
You have a 53-year employee of the Federal government suddenly calling for term limits? Let that sink in.
Funny.
ExpressLane
Verified User
That is exactly what I said.Poor anchovies,
You have a 53-year employee of the Federal government suddenly calling for term limits? Let that sink in.
Great mindsThat is exactly what I said.