Biden sums up Florida visit: 'Nobody intelligent can deny' effects of climate change

[QP!]

You mean government and UN scientist that have a monoply and won't allow opposing views in their studies. They are paid to get a specific result and if you don't do that you will be gone

Lots more scientists work outside the government and UN then within them so, no, there is no monopoly there.

But is that your answer why we should instead think you have a better assessment of the science? That you are more credible on scientific data review and assessment?

 

[Dutch Uncle]

Lots more scientists work outside the government and UN then within them so, no, there is no monopoly there.

But is that your answer why we should instead think you have a better assessment of the science? That you are more credible on scientific data review and assessment?

You're trying to educate a severely demented man who thinks he's an angel of God sent to murder Lefties....if he could find the keys to his facility to get out.

 

[Into the Night]

Lots more scientists work outside the government and UN then within them so, no, there is no monopoly there.

But is that your answer why we should instead think you have a better assessment of the science? That you are more credible on scientific data review and assessment?

There is no such thing as 'scientific data review and assessment'.
Science does not use consensus. It has no voting bloc. No one has to vote in science. Data is not science. Data is the result of observation, which also is not science. Random numbers are not data.

You have no data. It is not possible to measure the temperature of the Earth.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

There is no such thing as 'scientific data review and assessment'.
Science does not use consensus. It has no voting bloc. No one has to vote in science. Data is not science. Data is the result of observation, which also is not science. Random numbers are not data.

You have no data. It is not possible to measure the temperature of the Earth.

Mantra 44 Pulling nonsensical conclusions out of your ass.

Mantra 1a.

Mantra 4a.

One of the "miscellaneous" documents on that site is Into the Night's mantra list.

 

[Lionfish]

“Nobody can deny the impact of climate crises — at least nobody intelligent can deny the impact of the climate crisis anymore. Just look around, around the nation and the world for that matter,” Biden said. “Historic floods, intense droughts, extreme heat, deadly wildfires that have caused serious damage that we’ve never seen before.”

This comes the day after the White House added $4 billion to its request for emergency spending in the wake of Idalia and the Hawaii wildfires. The Friday proposal was on top of a previously announced $12 billion request, bringing the total to $16 billion.


https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...F?cvid=ecc567fb126f4c56a1ab745f349df6ef&ei=14

Summed up Guano, Brandon doesn't believe there has ever been a cat 3 hurricane?

 

[IBDaMann]

You mean government and UN scientist that have a monoply and won't allow opposing views in their studies. They are paid to get a specific result and if you don't do that you will be gone

It's not so much that "you will be gone." When the government purchases a study, the think tank knows up front what conclusion is being purchased, i.e. what the government is buying. When you order at a restaurant, you specify what the waiter is to bring you. Nobody ever tells the waiter "just surprise me." On any project, the client tells the offerors what the scope of work is, and firms bid on that. There is never any question about what the money is buying.

In other words, it never comes down to someone turning in a "study" that concludes/says the wrong things; the contractor/think tank knows that they simply won't get paid if that happens.

 

[ptif219]

Lots more scientists work outside the government and UN then within them so, no, there is no monopoly there.

But is that your answer why we should instead think you have a better assessment of the science? That you are more credible on scientific data review and assessment?

The IPCC is your authority for Global warming and they are government scientist

 

[Matt Dillon]

“Nobody can deny the impact of climate crises — at least nobody intelligent can deny the impact of the climate crisis anymore. Just look around, around the nation and the world for that matter,” Biden said. “Historic floods, intense droughts, extreme heat, deadly wildfires that have caused serious damage that we’ve never seen before.”

This comes the day after the White House added $4 billion to its request for emergency spending in the wake of Idalia and the Hawaii wildfires. The Friday proposal was on top of a previously announced $12 billion request, bringing the total to $16 billion.


https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...F?cvid=ecc567fb126f4c56a1ab745f349df6ef&ei=14

Biden can't sum up the square root of 9, you fuckin' dumbass! He's a potato and has been since 2020.

He ain't makin' it until next year. Lord help us all.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

Republicans don't consider statutory rape of 15 to 17-year-old American girls to be a crime.

 

[Into the Night]

^^^
As Sybil sinks deeper into a delusional psychosis, the world turns.

To bad there's no cure or treatment for you, Sock. You think your delusions are getting worse? I tend to agree.

 

[Into the Night]

The IPCC is your authority for Global warming and they are government scientist

'Climate scientists' deny and discard theories of science as a matter of routine, usually the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics and the Stefan-Boltzmann law.

 

[Into the Night]

Republicans don't consider statutory rape of 15 to 17-year-old American girls to be a crime.

You are describing Democrats again. No, thanks. I'll vote for Trump instead.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

Dutch and Into the Night, take it to the War Zone.

To bad there's no cure or treatment for you, Sock. You think your delusions are getting worse? I tend to agree.

War Zone, Sybil.