Can a President send anyone away to be tortured if he simply claims they are enemies of the State?

Jarod

Jarod

Well-known member
Contributor
Congressman John A. Bingham of Ohio wrote section 1 of the 14th to extend the original intent of the Bill of Rights to the States, often citing the appalling treatment of slaves by States not then burdened by the Bill of Right requirements.

So in essence the Due Process clause, that now applies to the Federal Government as well codifies in the Constitution the then understanding of who had a right to Due Process, which is ALL PEOPLE.

So, when the President says a person is an enemy combatant or in the United States illegally, that person has a right to Due Process, which is a hearing by a Judge to determine if the allegations of the Executive Branch are true, or at least have a rational basis.

The Felon violated this right when he sent people he claimed are here illegally to be tortured in an El Salvadoran prison.

Otherwise one man would be allowed to send anyone to be tortured in El Salvador by simply claiming they fit a category. Is that a power Americans want to give the President on his own accord without a check or balance?

I am certain the answer from any rational American would be a resounding NO.
 
These are not American citizens and they have been convicted of heinous crimes.

The expedited deportations are legal and will be affirmed by the Supreme Court.

The due process is not an issue as the Alien Enemies Act was challenged and the challenge failed in 1948…no due process issues.



[td]
Alien Enemies Act of 1798

[/td][td]
this law gave the president additional powers to detain non-citizens during times of war, invasion, or predatory incursion.[1]

[/td][td]
this law, amended in 1918, struck out provision restricting this section to males[2], is still in effect as 50 U.S.C. ch. 3.

[/td]
 
Last edited:
Jarod said:
Not upset, trying to teach the mob something about The United States.
Click to expand...
Yes, you are upset.

How many threads on this same topic have you started today?

Since you are so concerned about convicted illegal barbarians, perhaps you could take a few into your home.

You could have some average Publix eggs cooked for them.

Will Friday be too soon?
 
Last edited:
The Alien Enemies Act is now codified:

The National Emergencies Act(NEA) (Pub. L. 94–412, 90 Stat. 1255, enacted September 14, 1976, codified at 50 U.S.C. § 1601–1651) is a United States federal law passed to end all previous national emergencies and to formalize the emergency powers of the President.

The Act empowers the President to activate special powers during a crisis but imposes certain procedural formalities when invoking such powers. The perceived need for the law arose from the scope and number of laws granting special powers to the executive in times of national emergency. Congress can terminate an emergency declaration with a joint resolution enacted into law.<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Emergencies_Act#cite_note-struyk19-1"><span>[</span>1<span>]</span></a> Powers available under this Act are limited to the 136 emergency powers Congress has defined by law.<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Emergencies_Act#cite_note-auto-2"><span>[</span>2<span>]</span></a>
 
Jarod said:
Congressman John A. Bingham of Ohio wrote section 1 of the 14th to extend the original intent of the Bill of Rights to the States, often citing the appalling treatment of slaves by States not then burdened by the Bill of Right requirements.

So in essence the Due Process clause, that now applies to the Federal Government as well codifies in the Constitution the then understanding of who had a right to Due Process, which is ALL PEOPLE.

So, when the President says a person is an enemy combatant or in the United States illegally, that person has a right to Due Process, which is a hearing by a Judge to determine if the allegations of the Executive Branch are true, or at least have a rational basis.

The Felon violated this right when he sent people he claimed are here illegally to be tortured in an El Salvadoran prison.

Otherwise one man would be allowed to send anyone to be tortured in El Salvador by simply claiming they fit a category. Is that a power Americans want to give the President on his own accord without a check or balance?

I am certain the answer from any rational American would be a resounding NO.
Click to expand...
Obama killed a 16 year old American citizen
 
Jarod said:
When Trumppers are advocating for The Convicted Felon to be free to deport people based on his word... this is what you are supporting.
Click to expand...
Not much difference from Christian Nation SCOTUS Rehnquist Bicentennial Fourth Reich July after thieving US Constitution Bill of Rights - old glorys - old testaments - absentee voting ballots arsonists were granted standing while George Washington University Hospital Washington, D.C. born USA citizens were deemed Islam in their “serve the Pope or die” Christiananality pedophilia master race Federal Lynching KKKidnapping master plan Trumpanzees Trumpanazis continue Trumpamengele as
“one nation under God with equal justice under law”…..
 
Last edited:
SmarterthanYou said:
you still don't get it, do you, hypocrite?
Click to expand...
You do not get it. Every person in the country is entitled to present their case. When you gather up a bunch of people and ship them to another country to be tortured, mistakes will be made. Mistakes have been made. I am not comfortable with paying megamillions to another country to torture and abuse people who were allowed no defense and no hearings. This is not what America should be, in my view. You are a Trumpy, so you do not care.
 
Jarod said:
Congressman John A. Bingham of Ohio wrote section 1 of the 14th to extend the original intent of the Bill of Rights to the States, often citing the appalling treatment of slaves by States not then burdened by the Bill of Right requirements.

So in essence the Due Process clause, that now applies to the Federal Government as well codifies in the Constitution the then understanding of who had a right to Due Process, which is ALL PEOPLE.

So, when the President says a person is an enemy combatant or in the United States illegally, that person has a right to Due Process, which is a hearing by a Judge to determine if the allegations of the Executive Branch are true, or at least have a rational basis.

The Felon violated this right when he sent people he claimed are here illegally to be tortured in an El Salvadoran prison.

Otherwise one man would be allowed to send anyone to be tortured in El Salvador by simply claiming they fit a category. Is that a power Americans want to give the President on his own accord without a check or balance?

I am certain the answer from any rational American would be a resounding NO.
Click to expand...

Oh look, Jerri is promoting terrorists on American soil again.

Citizen, Comrade: Look up the meaning.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top