Can any Palin supporter defend this idiocy? Dixie? Anyone?

Blackflag

Blackflag

Junior Member
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2008/10/palin-fears-med.html

If the media convince enough voters that that is negative campaigning, for me to call Barack Obama out on his associations," Palin told host Chris Plante, "then I don't know what the future of our country would be in terms of First Amendment rights and our ability to ask questions without fear of attacks by the mainstream media."



This dummy doesn't even understand the first amendment.
 
Do not question Obama or be accused of racism.

The reporter from Florida that dared ask Biden some tough questions, banished. The newspaper reporters whose papers were not supporting Obama, banished. The LA Times is holding a tape that could possibly embarrass the one, but they are sitting on it. You explain that to me. Must be nice to know you have the MSM in your pocket.

The media has given him a free pass
 
webbway said:
Do not question Obama or be accused of racism.

The reporter from Florida that dared ask Biden some tough questions, banished. The newspaper reporters whose papers were not supporting Obama, banished. The LA Times is holding a tape that could possibly embarrass the one, but they are sitting on it. You explain that to me. Must be nice to know you have the MSM in your pocket.

The media has given him a free pass
Click to expand...

This, coming from a douchebag who has decided to have a brazenly racist and atavistic "photo" of Obama as his avatar.

No one is going to take your arguments seriously when you discredit yourself without even typing a word.
 
Blackflag said:
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2008/10/palin-fears-med.html

If the media convince enough voters that that is negative campaigning, for me to call Barack Obama out on his associations," Palin told host Chris Plante, "then I don't know what the future of our country would be in terms of First Amendment rights and our ability to ask questions without fear of attacks by the mainstream media."



This dummy doesn't even understand the first amendment.
Click to expand...

and you do? pray tell explain oh constitutional one.
 
SmarterThanYou said:
and you do? pray tell explain oh constitutional one.
Click to expand...



Yeah dumb fuck I can. Freedom of speech is guaranteed as far as the govt. is concerned. The govt. can't arrest her or harass her because of the bile she spews about Obama.

The reporters and others can call her comments whatever they want and it doesn't infringe on her first amendment rights. You have no right to speak without people criticizing your dumbass views.

Did I explain it simply enough for your neanderthal pea brain?
 
webbway said:
Do not question Obama or be accused of racism.

The reporter from Florida that dared ask Biden some tough questions, banished. The newspaper reporters whose papers were not supporting Obama, banished. The LA Times is holding a tape that could possibly embarrass the one, but they are sitting on it. You explain that to me. Must be nice to know you have the MSM in your pocket.

The media has given him a free pass
Click to expand...

Make your own thread faggot. This one is about freedom of speech. FYI Maureen Dowd was thrown off of McCain's shit talk express along time ago but I ain't crying. Dry your tears and take the sand out of your vagina.
 
Blackflag said:
Yeah dumb fuck I can. Freedom of speech is guaranteed as far as the govt. is concerned. The govt. can't arrest her or harass her because of the bile she spews about Obama.

The reporters and others can call her comments whatever they want and it doesn't infringe on her first amendment rights. You have no right to speak without people criticizing your dumbass views.

Did I explain it simply enough for your neanderthal pea brain?
Click to expand...

no fucktard, you didn't. your liberal pansy socialistic view of the first amendment so far is equal to your pitiful IQ. Your idiotic ideology and totally fucked up view of the constitution speaks volumes about how fucking stupid you are when it comes to understanding what responsibilities are required when exercising guaranteed rights, or is it only the 2nd Amendment that requires responsibility in your living version of the constitution?

Now, did I explain THAT enough for your molecule sized brain, fucking socialist?
 
SmarterThanYou said:
no fucktard, you didn't. your liberal pansy socialistic view of the first amendment so far is equal to your pitiful IQ. Your idiotic ideology and totally fucked up view of the constitution speaks volumes about how fucking stupid you are when it comes to understanding what responsibilities are required when exercising guaranteed rights, or is it only the 2nd Amendment that requires responsibility in your living version of the constitution?

Now, did I explain THAT enough for your molecule sized brain, fucking socialist?
Click to expand...

No you didn't explain anything. faggot. Also I support the 2nd just as much as the first.

So explain troll, where in the first amendment does the bill of rights guarantee your right to to speak without someone calling you out on your bullshit?
 
SmarterThanYou said:
no fucktard, you didn't. your liberal pansy socialistic view of the first amendment so far is equal to your pitiful IQ. Your idiotic ideology and totally fucked up view of the constitution speaks volumes about how fucking stupid you are when it comes to understanding what responsibilities are required when exercising guaranteed rights, or is it only the 2nd Amendment that requires responsibility in your living version of the constitution?

Now, did I explain THAT enough for your molecule sized brain, fucking socialist?
Click to expand...

So it is your claim that the first amendment protects your right to speech, AND bestows a right upon you to be free from criticism from that speech? Is this correct?

Again I must ask - when you chose your monkier, who was the "you" you had in mind? Do you have an infant?
 
Blackflag said:
No you didn't explain anything. faggot. Also I support the 2nd just as much as the first.

So explain troll, where in the first amendment does the bill of rights guarantee your right to to speak without someone calling you out on your bullshit?
Click to expand...

I didn't say that it does. I asked you to explain the first amendment further and you jumped on the idiot name calling bandwagon because you THINK someone called you out. You fail.
 
Darla said:
So it is your claim that the first amendment protects your right to speech, AND bestows a right upon you to be free from criticism from that speech? Is this correct?

Again I must ask - when you chose your monkier, who was the "you" you had in mind? Do you have an infant?
Click to expand...

read the above. :readit:
 
SmarterThanYou said:
no fucktard, you didn't. your liberal pansy socialistic view of the first amendment so far is equal to your pitiful IQ. Your idiotic ideology and totally fucked up view of the constitution speaks volumes about how fucking stupid you are when it comes to understanding what responsibilities are required when exercising guaranteed rights, or is it only the 2nd Amendment that requires responsibility in your living version of the constitution?

Now, did I explain THAT enough for your molecule sized brain, fucking socialist?
Click to expand...
Tell me about the responsiblities enumerated in the first amendment. What is, in your own words, the RESPONSIBILITIES that are required. No really stop, there are none, not in the amendment. And being free of criticism is NOT a right under the first amendment. So while he might have been a little harsh when calling your brain a pea sized and neanderthal, he was right that the first amendment only proscribes government action.
 
Socrtease said:
Tell me about the responsiblities enumerated in the first amendment. What is, in your own words, the RESPONSIBILITIES that are required. No really stop, there are none, not in the amendment. And being free of criticism is NOT a right under the first amendment. So while he might have been a little harsh when calling your brain a pea sized and neanderthal, he was right that the first amendment only proscribes government action.
Click to expand...

hmmm, the words libel and slander mean anything to you?
 
"If the media convince enough voters that that is negative campaigning, for me to call Barack Obama out on his associations," Palin told host Chris Plante, "then I don't know what the future of our country would be in terms of First Amendment rights and our ability to ask questions without fear of attacks by the mainstream media."

Palin is expressing her opinion, not filing a complaint of her rights being violated. She is essentially saying, this is a 'slippery slope', when the mainstream media is allowed to proclaim her guilty of 'negative campaigning' when all she did was raise legitimate questions about past associations. There is nothing remotely 'negative' in questioning Obama's past associations. But, since the MSM is on Obama's side and trying to get him elected, they categorized her comments as "negative campaigning" and condemned her for it. They are not supposed to "condemn" or "endorse" anyone, they are supposed to remain objective and neutral. Such condemnations are are a threat (by intimidation) to free speech, a right found in the First Amendment of the Constitution.

Now Blackflag, let's talk about how uneducated and ignorant of the Constitution you are... You were asked to articulate the First Amendment and you said...

"Freedom of speech is guaranteed as far as the govt. is concerned. The govt. can't arrest her or harass her because of the bile she spews about Obama."

This is completely inaccurate. The First Amendment doesn't even mention the government. It has absolutely nothing to do with what the government can or can't do, that is established in another part of the Bill of Rights entirely. The First Amendment guarantees Palin's right to political free speech, period. Anyone, or any 'entity' who tries to deny her this right, is in violation of the First Amendment. Through the intimidation of unfair condemnation by the press, it is somewhat 'denying' the right to speak freely. Or at least, threatening to deny that right. Which is exactly what Palin articulated.

So, we have established that Palin is smarter than you, Darla, and anyone else here, who wants to make some 'argument' out of this. Of course, I already knew she was smarter than you retards, so I'm not surprised.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top