Christianity: Conservative or Socialist?

but that is NOT what you said before...



it is one thing to say we can't prove what the primary source said was true, it is another to say there is no primary source....it is the latter we have been debating.....

There are NO primary resources from the period described in the bible ANYWHERE. There cannot be. Now if you wish to spin that further please be my guest.
You can run around like a kindy kid as much as you like, punching the air and saying you win if you wish.
It will not make real that which is not, was not and never can be.
 
There are NO primary resources from the period described in the bible ANYWHERE. There cannot be. Now if you wish to spin that further please be my guest.
You can run around like a kindy kid as much as you like, punching the air and saying you win if you wish.
It will not make real that which is not, was not and never can be.

????.....do you know what a "primary source" means?......are you claiming there cannot be written records from someone with direct personal knowledge of the subject matter?.......why on earth could they not?.....
 
????.....do you know what a "primary source" means?......are you claiming there cannot be written records from someone with direct personal knowledge of the subject matter?.......why on earth could they not?.....

I introduced the term here. However you now bore me so if you wish to count that as a win, a lose or a draw, please be my guest.
I will not debate this with you any more.
Have a nice day.
 
Back
Top