‘Code Pink’ protesters leave Barney Frank seeing red

evince said:
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/06/25/b...&en=a4897f01e8bccd97&ei=5007&partner=USERLAND



Tell me how FM was in big trouble financially in 2003 if it had just underreported its earning to the tune of billions?
Click to expand...

How does lying make a company sound? The earnings were based on bad loans as well. Everyone knew what was going on, and dems are responsible for strongarming institutions into giving bad loans based on "social justice". These basic truths you cannot comprehend, apparently.
 
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ivmL-lXNy64"]YouTube - EVIDENCE FOUND!!! Clinton administration's "BANK AFFIRMATIVE ACTION" They forced banks to make BAD LOANS and ACORN and Obama's tie to all of it!!![/ame]
 
FM issued 16 % fewer subprime in 2003 huh?

UBS issued 160% more.

UBS is the bank Gramm went to work at right after passing GLBact 1999.
 
Again, Desh's support of Freddie and Fannie are very transparent. They are both associated with being in with the Democratic Party as they lend to lower income and minority communities. Harold Rines, who worked in the Clinton Administration, was the CEO when these accounting irregularities went down. That's why Desh is supporting them to the end and in this case is AGAINST the more regulation that was proposed on Fannie and Freddie.
 
evince said:
keep stretching cawak
Click to expand...

where am I wrong? I'm no mind reader but this issue has been discussed enough that your position is pretty clear. And if nothing else you are pretty consistent in your defense of the party you love.
 
evince said:
check this chart and you will see just how stupid it is to say the sub prome problem was cause by FM

Look at the other intities issuings of the sub prime, FM was a drop in the bucket.
Click to expand...

One year is not the issue. Fuck that year. you're limiting the scope of relevancy to make a dumb point.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top