Does Anybody Really Think Trump Would Admit It If He Was Guilty?

Hello christiefan915,

No, he will never admit anything. And he will find someone else to blame, just like he blames Obama, Hillary, Mueller, Comey etc. for all the bad press he gets.

Many on the right seem clueless about the main stream media. They think it is all biased.

NO! Some outlets lean one way, some lean the other.

It never seems to occur to many on the right that maybe it's not the media but what these office holders do. Maybe it's not the coverage. Maybe it is what is being covered...

If you don't want bad press reports don't do bad things!

If you don't want the media reporting how much the president lied or how crooked he is, elect a better president!

I don't trust the president.

He won't answer a charge. Instead he will issue an insult. That is not standing up for what you believe in.

That is a useless 'alternate reality' of innuendo and diversion.

America wants straight answers, not a bunch of doubletalk.

I think the president is guilty. He is a con man. He wouldn't admit anything.

Getting a straight answer out of him is as likely as getting trolls to quit.
 
Mueller hasn't found anything on Trump and now he's desperate. It's now a fishing expedition. Rumor is he's so desperate he's looking a decade's old casino records hoping he can find something that looks vaguely like money laundering.

You have no idea what Mueller has!
 
If he can't find anything to put Trump away, he should make something up.

Trump's freedom to exist in civilized society is a personal affront to me.

He existence itself is a crime against decent humanity.

And now it seems that the same is true for all of his Trumpanzees as well.

They're a cancer on the American population.

Rough words!
And 100% true
 
Hard to believe Trump took Putin's word over the FBI.

Shows he is dirty and has no intention of every owning up to it.

He thinks he can get away with this.

America needs to show him different.
 
If he can't find anything to put Trump away, he should make something up.

Trump's freedom to exist in civilized society is a personal affront to me.

He existence itself is a crime against decent humanity.

And now it seems that the same is true for all of his Trumpanzees as well.

They're a cancer on the American population.

You sound like you would be happier in an authoritarian or totalitarian society. They can just get rid of all those people you don't like--none of that stupid equality stuff.
 
Hello Flash,

You sound like you would be happier in an authoritarian or totalitarian society. They can just get rid of all those people you don't like--none of that stupid equality stuff.

Low blow.

And I don't think you really believe what you said.

Not that Nifty's comment was exactly of impeccable taste.

As much as I would like to have Trump outta there it has to be clearly justified. That way, the deniers have nothing to stand on and come off looking totally silly. When America is healthy we should not be embracing hate and science denial.

Trump needs to be brought to answer for specific charges which can clearly be shown to be 'high crimes or misdemeanors,' and enough evidence presented that the charges stick.

That might be collusion, might be obstruction, might be bribery, might be emoluments. I understand Mueller is now looking into the Trump organization. Trump warned him not to go there, but then Muller doesn't answer to Trump. He answers to Rosenstein. And so far, Trump has not taken the bait to try to fire Rosenstein. He seems to be listening to good advice for a change so far. We'll see. That's a red line if he tries to fire him or Mueller. That's pretty convincing obstruction. That's a high crime or misdemeanor.

Collusion is not specifically against the law, but collusion with the Russians is tantamount to treason, which is an impeachable offense.

Did Trump bribe Stormy Daniels?

Has Trump accepted gifts or other in return for executive action? That's bribery.

If Trump is giving Putin a free pass because Putin has something on him that could be treason.
 
Fact is former Secty of States say their presidents had man to man meetings with foreign leaders. the difference is, they immediately discussed what was said with their staff and got as honest transcription as possible written down. Trump is a king. He does not answer to anyone including the cabinet . King Trump the last.
 
Trump joked about that saying he would blame someone when things go wrong. He knows that is among his many character flaws.
 
Last edited:
Hello Flash,

I meant it. I think anybody who wants to make something up to punish anybody has authoritarian tendencies--by definition.

That's just crazy talk.

Americans like freedom.

If you have to believe that Americans with political positions in opposition to yours want a totalitarian authoritarian government to toss our Constitution in the trash, then you should reexamine your own political positioning. Something is amiss.

What do you feel has been 'made up?'
 
Hello Flash,

That's just crazy talk.

Americans like freedom.

If you have to believe that Americans with political positions in opposition to yours want a totalitarian authoritarian government to toss our Constitution in the trash, then you should reexamine your own political positioning. Something is amiss.

What do you feel has been 'made up?'

PoliTalker

I don't think you are following the conversation. Below is the post I responded to calling the person authoritarian. Anyone who wants to make up charges to get Trump, Clinton, or a serial killer has authoritarian tendencies by definition. It ignores due process and the rule of law-the ends justifies the means.

"If he can't find anything to put Trump away, he should make something up."

There might have been a certain amount of sarcasm in the original post and my reply since I do not know if he meant it literally. I did not say someone wants authoritarian government because of different political opinions than mine but because they are willing to abandon basic due process.

What was "made up" is whatever the poster wants to make up in order to get somebody.
 
PoliTalker

I don't think you are following the conversation. Below is the post I responded to calling the person authoritarian. Anyone who wants to make up charges to get Trump, Clinton, or a serial killer has authoritarian tendencies by definition. It ignores due process and the rule of law-the ends justifies the means.

"If he can't find anything to put Trump away, he should make something up."

There might have been a certain amount of sarcasm in the original post and my reply since I do not know if he meant it literally. I did not say someone wants authoritarian government because of different political opinions than mine but because they are willing to abandon basic due process.

What was "made up" is whatever the poster wants to make up in order to get somebody.

Obviously you do not understand the term "by definition" in any way...in any respect.

Learn it...or use a different phrase to say whatever the hell it is you are attempting, unsuccessfully, to say.
 
Obviously you do not understand the term "by definition" in any way...in any respect.

Learn it...or use a different phrase to say whatever the hell it is you are attempting, unsuccessfully, to say.

Maybe you fail to grasp the characteristics of authoritarian.

A governmental authority with the power to make up charges to punish a person is a government with no responsibility to constitutional rule or the people. And, a person who favors such acts gives blind obedience to that authoritarian regime.

Thus, authoritarian tendencies by definition.
 
Hello Flash,

PoliTalker

I don't think you are following the conversation. Below is the post I responded to calling the person authoritarian. Anyone who wants to make up charges to get Trump, Clinton, or a serial killer has authoritarian tendencies by definition. It ignores due process and the rule of law-the ends justifies the means.

"If he can't find anything to put Trump away, he should make something up."

There might have been a certain amount of sarcasm in the original post and my reply since I do not know if he meant it literally. I did not say someone wants authoritarian government because of different political opinions than mine but because they are willing to abandon basic due process.

What was "made up" is whatever the poster wants to make up in order to get somebody.

My bad. Please accept my apology. I'm sorry.

I exaggerated your comment about one person into applying to everyone who thinks differently than you do.

I am trying to not do that, and I messed up.

Thanks for your patient explanation, Sir Flash.

This is an opportunity for me to transcend, and I don't want to miss it.

I like to recognize transgressions so I can try to avoid them in the future.

Improvement is sometimes a bit messy.
 
Back
Top