Wrong. They stated they might not get a conviction. They never said there was no case.
Right there isn't a strong enough case of guilt to get a conviction so WHY WASTE OUR TIME?! FFS
But the exact same case against Trump is worth prosecuting... Got it.
According to the authorities, he was asked for the documents and didn't give them all back. They asked again for the documents which trump denied having but got caught moving said documents to different locations. This prompted the raid at mar a lago. Not at all the same situation.
Irrelevant. Possession is sufficient for prosecution. The fact--FACT--that Biden took documents, stored them in unauthorized places, showed them to unauthorized persons (he admitted to showing them to his ghost writer for example), is sufficient for prosecution. Biden didn't voluntarily return anything. He got caught having them and gave them up. He didn't happen to go out in his garage and see a box of classified documents and say, 'Oh! These are classified. I should call the FBI and return them.' He is every bit as culpable and chargeable as Trump.
Facts trump (pun intended) opinion. Your source is trash as it is nothing but opinion.
Could it be fact and that is why they aren't bringing a case against biden? yes? hello?
No, Hur recognized that you don't go after a sitting president, or top powerful politicians--like the Hildabeast--on something like this. You let it slide. The stupidity is the TDS / hate Trump, get him at any cost bunch that are quite literally starting the US down a path to being a Turd World banana republic.
And then cited complete bullshit about him as a defendant. He had docs from when he was IN THE SENATE =- "guilt beyond a reasonable doubt."