Even liberal icon RFK jr says J6 was NOT AN INSURRECTION!!!

Walt said:
Pelosi was the Speaker of the House, and so had no power to schedule or cancel any hearing on that day. That day has one scheduled thing, and that is scheduled by the Constitution, and led by the VP.

If trump has a "ton of evidence", why hasn't he released it?
Click to expand...

She prevented Trump from calling out the National Guard halfwit. Why do you think she and Bowser did that? Because they weren't privy to the same intel Trump and her Capitol police had? Given the video and evidence of the testimonies, it appears there is an effort to cover up the actual intent of leaving the Capitol so badly protected on that critical day.

Ex-Capitol Police Chief Says Requests For National Guard Denied 6 Times In Riots

The former chief of U.S. Capitol Police says security officials at the House and Senate rebuffed his early requests to call in the National Guard ahead of a demonstration in support of President Trump that turned into a deadly attack on Congress.

Former chief Steven Sund -- who resigned his post last week after House Speaker Nancy Pelosi called for him to step down -- made the assertions in an interview with The Washington Post published Sunday.

Sund contradicts claims made by officials after Wednesday's assault on Capitol Hill. Sund's superiors said previously that the National Guard and other additional security support could have been provided, but no one at the Capitol requested it.

Sund told the Post that House Sergeant-at-Arms Paul Irving was concerned with the "optics" of declaring an emergency ahead of the protests and rejected a National Guard presence. He says Senate Sergeant-at-Arms Michael Stenger recommended that he informally request the Guard to be ready in case it was needed to maintain security.

Like Sund, Irving and Stenger have also since resigned their posts.

Sund says he requested assistance six times ahead of and during the attack on the Capitol. Each of those requests was denied or delayed, he says.

Washington, D.C., Mayor Muriel Bowser also wanted a light police presence at the Capitol. She reportedly wanted to avoid a similar scenario as last summer, when federal forces responded to demonstrators opposed to police abuses who assembled near the White House.
 
Walt said:
We have been over this, repeatedly. The Speaker of the House has no authority to prevent the president from calling out the DC National Guard.



She had one third of the oversight power, with the other two thirds being held by Republicans.
Click to expand...

Bottom line: Trump supporters are stupid and willfully ignorant. And they have no self respect.
 
PROOF OF INSURRECTION:

Rioters are chanting "Hang Mike Pence" while Trump says "If Mike Pence does the right thing, we win the election."

That pretty much spells INSURRECTION!!

 
Truth Detector said:
She prevented Trump from calling out the National Guard halfwit. Why do you think she and Bowser did that? Because they weren't privy to the same intel Trump and her Capitol police had? Given the video and evidence of the testimonies, it appears there is an effort to cover up the actual intent of leaving the Capitol so badly protected on that critical day.

Ex-Capitol Police Chief Says Requests For National Guard Denied 6 Times In Riots

The former chief of U.S. Capitol Police says security officials at the House and Senate rebuffed his early requests to call in the National Guard ahead of a demonstration in support of President Trump that turned into a deadly attack on Congress.

Former chief Steven Sund -- who resigned his post last week after House Speaker Nancy Pelosi called for him to step down -- made the assertions in an interview with The Washington Post published Sunday.

Sund contradicts claims made by officials after Wednesday's assault on Capitol Hill. Sund's superiors said previously that the National Guard and other additional security support could have been provided, but no one at the Capitol requested it.

Sund told the Post that House Sergeant-at-Arms Paul Irving was concerned with the "optics" of declaring an emergency ahead of the protests and rejected a National Guard presence. He says Senate Sergeant-at-Arms Michael Stenger recommended that he informally request the Guard to be ready in case it was needed to maintain security.

Like Sund, Irving and Stenger have also since resigned their posts.

Sund says he requested assistance six times ahead of and during the attack on the Capitol. Each of those requests was denied or delayed, he says.

Washington, D.C., Mayor Muriel Bowser also wanted a light police presence at the Capitol. She reportedly wanted to avoid a similar scenario as last summer, when federal forces responded to demonstrators opposed to police abuses who assembled near the White House.
Click to expand...

LINK?


It’s against the rules here to post content without a link


All you know is rule breaking and lying huh
 
evince said:
LINK?


It’s against the rules here to post content without a link

All you know is rule breaking and lying huh
Click to expand...

So Truth Denier claims that Pelosi overruled Trump:

She prevented Trump from calling out the National Guard

Do we really want a president who lets a woman overrule him in making important decisions?
What a pussy Trump is. Backing down to Pelosi.
 
Think about it for a minute:

trump needs Kennedy to draw away voters who will not vote for trump, even just a few of them. These are voters who cannot vote for trump, because he tried to overthrow the US Government, or so they believe. That means saying that trump was right hurts Kennedy's chances with them, and therefore hurts trump.
 
Text Drivers are Killers said:
Yes they did , you liar. The repubs pointed out that the PA state constitution bans no-excuse mail-in voting and yet millions were sent out.!
Click to expand...

We have been over this a few times. The Pennsylvania Constitution does not ban any type of mail-in voting. It does require some types, but does not ban any type.
 
Walt said:
We have been over this a few times. The Pennsylvania Constitution does not ban any type of mail-in voting. It does require some types, but does not ban any type.
Click to expand...

You stinking liar. It lists the conditions under which mail-in ballots can be issued. Why would the state constitution do that if no-excuse mail-in ballots could be sent out???

YOU ARE STUPID EVEN FOR A TRANNY
 
Text Drivers are Killers said:
It lists the conditions under which mail-in ballots can be issued.
Click to expand...

It lists the conditions that mail-in ballots SHALL be issued, but does not list any conditions that mail-in ballots SHALL NOT be issued. That means the Constitution does require Pennsylvania to issue mail-in ballots under some conditions, but does not limit mail-in ballots to those conditions. The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania can make its own decisions for the rest of the time.

Text Drivers are Killers said:
Why would the state constitution do that if no-excuse mail-in ballots could be sent out???
Click to expand...

The Constitution required it in some situations, and in others left it up to others to decide. The US Constitution says we need to hold a census every 10 years. That does not ban the government from holding smaller censuses every year.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top