FBI Orchestrated Jan 6 Riots ‘to Entrap MAGA Americans,’ Explains Congress’ Homeland

C

coldjoint

Verified User
Rep. Clay Higgins (R-LA), who chairs the Homeland Security Committee’s border subcommittee, is claiming Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) agents entrapped the U.S. Capitol rioters on January 6, 2021. The four-term Louisana Republican, speaking with the Implicit Bias podcast, said he reached his conclusion after conducting his own investigation into the matter.

According to Higgins, the protestors were incited to violence by “ghost buses” filled with FBI agent provocateurs. He added that when the House of Representatives finishes with the process of releasing the security tapes from that day, the federal prosecution of the January 6 rioters will fall apart.

When a Democrat Congressman tells you something you idiots believe them. This guy is also a Congressman. He is not lying.

While there has been no conclusive evidence that the FBI instigated the January 6 riot, several law enforcement officials have admitted that federal agents were among the crowd on that day. The National Pulse reported in August of last year that former Capitol Hill Police Chief Steven Sund had told Tucker Carlson in an unaired Fox News interview that “there was a fair amount of law enforcement” in the January 6 crowd. Sund said in the days after the riot, he discovered that the FBI had at least 18 undercover agents in the crowd.

In May of last year, an FBI whistleblower told the House Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government that the bureau withheld further CCTV footage from the riot over fears of outing “undercover” agents present in the crowd. In January 2022, FBI Executive Assistant Director Jill Sanborn refused to deny the FBI’s involvement in the January 6 violence.

The FBI is capable of identifying anyone who was there. They use facial recognition and are still arresting people 3 years later. Make them identify everyone. They should have no problem with that but they do. Why do you think that is?
https://thenationalpulse.com/2024/0...ns-explains-congress-homeland-security-chief/
 
coldjoint said:
Rep. Clay Higgins (R-LA), who chairs the Homeland Security Committee’s border subcommittee, is claiming Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) agents entrapped the U.S. Capitol rioters on January 6, 2021. The four-term Louisana Republican, speaking with the Implicit Bias podcast, said he reached his conclusion after conducting his own investigation into the matter.

According to Higgins, the protestors were incited to violence by “ghost buses” filled with FBI agent provocateurs. He added that when the House of Representatives finishes with the process of releasing the security tapes from that day, the federal prosecution of the January 6 rioters will fall apart.

When a Democrat Congressman tells you something you idiots believe them. This guy is also a Congressman. He is not lying.

While there has been no conclusive evidence that the FBI instigated the January 6 riot, several law enforcement officials have admitted that federal agents were among the crowd on that day. The National Pulse reported in August of last year that former Capitol Hill Police Chief Steven Sund had told Tucker Carlson in an unaired Fox News interview that “there was a fair amount of law enforcement” in the January 6 crowd. Sund said in the days after the riot, he discovered that the FBI had at least 18 undercover agents in the crowd.

In May of last year, an FBI whistleblower told the House Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government that the bureau withheld further CCTV footage from the riot over fears of outing “undercover” agents present in the crowd. In January 2022, FBI Executive Assistant Director Jill Sanborn refused to deny the FBI’s involvement in the January 6 violence.

The FBI is capable of identifying anyone who was there. They use facial recognition and are still arresting people 3 years later. Make them identify everyone. They should have no problem with that but they do. Why do you think that is?
https://thenationalpulse.com/2024/0...ns-explains-congress-homeland-security-chief/
Click to expand...

yep.


half of them are feds.

thanks for pursuing truth.
 
[video]https://rumble.com/v421qok-title-is-j6-legal-fundraiser-video.html[/video]

Could someone post this video for me? I am used to another forum. Or tell me how it is done. I don't know how many traitors will click on the link.
 
There are people on this board who believe dumb shit like that. The crazies will chime in. They will reveal themselves.
 
coldjoint said:
This guy is also a Congressman. He is not lying.
Click to expand...

Why do we have to believe him? Why can't he provide us the evidence?

coldjoint said:
Fact Witnesses
Click to expand...

The concept of a "fact witness" is a new concept. Rather than providing evidence, they provide a witness that says that they saw evidence. It is kind of like an expert witness, but an expert witness helps interpret the evidence. These "fact witnesses" do not claim to have any special ability to interpret the evidence, and they have no intention of letting us see the evidence.

With the invasion of Iraq, Bush's "fact witnesses" were supposedly excused because providing the evidence would endanger intelligence sources. As it turns out, the "fact witnesses" were just cherry picking extremely weak evidence that would not have held up to scrutiny.

The new "fact witnesses" do not even have national security as an excuse. When asked to present the evidence they swear to have, they refuse. That starts becoming a crime.
 
CIA/FBI....the FBI did not have the skills for this sort of operation...they came from the CIA which has been doing this sort of thing overseas for decades.
 
Hawkeye10 said:
CIA/FBI....the FBI did not have the skills for this sort of operation...they came from the CIA which has been doing this sort of thing overseas for decades.
Click to expand...

How exactly did they convince "patriotic Americans" to commit treason?
 
Walt said:
Why do we have to believe him? Why can't he provide us the evidence?



The concept of a "fact witness" is a new concept. Rather than providing evidence, they provide a witness that says that they saw evidence. It is kind of like an expert witness, but an expert witness helps interpret the evidence. These "fact witnesses" do not claim to have any special ability to interpret the evidence, and they have no intention of letting us see the evidence.

With the invasion of Iraq, Bush's "fact witnesses" were supposedly excused because providing the evidence would endanger intelligence sources. As it turns out, the "fact witnesses" were just cherry picking extremely weak evidence that would not have held up to scrutiny.

The new "fact witnesses" do not even have national security as an excuse. When asked to present the evidence they swear to have, they refuse. That starts becoming a crime.
Click to expand...

Why won't the FBI tell us how many agents were there? Works both ways Wally.
 
Over 800 have been found guilty and not one was an agent. Trumpys believe anything they are told by far-right sources.
 
coldjoint said:
Why won't the FBI tell us how many agents were there?
Click to expand...

Has the FBI ever said there was even one agent there? There was a sometimes informant there, but it is not unusual for criminals who are sometimes informants to also commit crimes. Criminals commit crime, none of that is shocking. The FBI clearly had no previous knowledge that he was going to commit a crime.
 
Walt said:
Wow, so about a thousand FBI agents caught on security camera breaking into the Capitol Building... That should be easy to prove... We are waiting.
Click to expand...

is Ray Epps a valid example for you?

an informant clearly coordinating activities and planning the whole thing according to his tweets?
 
Blackwater Lunchbreak said:
is Ray Epps a valid example for you?
Click to expand...

We went from over a thousand FBI agents, to one who never was an agent or informant. What do they call someone who is neither an agent nor any informant? Oh yeah, just some guy.

Blackwater Lunchbreak said:
an informant clearly coordinating activities and planning the whole thing according to his tweets?
Click to expand...

According to his court suit, Epps never worked for or with the FBI. He is one of you, not one of them.
 
Walt said:
We went from over a thousand FBI agents, to one who never was an agent or informant. What do they call someone who is neither an agent nor any informant? Oh yeah, just some guy.



According to his court suit, Epps never worked for or with the FBI. He is one of you, not one of them.
Click to expand...

no evidence will work for you. he is one of them.

you will keep lying until you just lose everything.

you're a goner and its very sad for your soul.
 
coldjoint said:
Rep. Clay Higgins (R-LA), who chairs the Homeland Security Committee’s border subcommittee, is claiming Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) agents entrapped the U.S. Capitol rioters on January 6, 2021. The four-term Louisana Republican, speaking with the Implicit Bias podcast, said he reached his conclusion after conducting his own investigation into the matter....
Click to expand...
Proof he's a MAGAt idiot. If true, it also proves that the Republican President and the Republican Senate in 2020 were completely incompetent.
 
Doc Dutch said:
Proof he's a MAGAt idiot. If true, it also proves that the Republican President and the Republican Senate in 2020 were completely incompetent.
Click to expand...

at least you're getting your arguments all in a row already, because you know it's true.

you gave away the goose already dum dum.

you're not fit for this mission.

:truestory:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top