Your first sentence is a regurgitation of a previous post that is more projection than addressing the key points of my responses.
Puh-leeze, Cy! Spare us this lame attempt at smoke blowing and dodging .... you're not smart enough or adept enough to pull it off (only the smiling joker you see in the mirror nods in approval of your tactic). THIS ENTIRE THREAD IS BASED UPON DISCUSSION OF THOSE WHO REJECT (wait for it) RELIGION AND THE CONCEPT OF GOD AS BEING SOMEONE TO FEAR! YOU attempted to caste all atheists as prone to be (and I'll cut you some slack by inserting "potentially") morally deficient based on their beliefs. I correctly pointed out that "moralism" is no more or less imbued in human beings regardless of whether they are religious, atheist or agnostic ... as I pointed out the historic records of whole sale murder in the name of religion (i.e. Crusades, Jihads, Inquisition, America's and Australia's "Native" schools).
Now you keep waffling and BS'ing, name dropping objective/subjective morality do bolster your basic intention.
I'll dumb it down for you with regards to the subject title of this thread; THERE IS NO MORE NEED TO FEAR ATHEISM THAN THERE IS TO FEAR RELIGIOUS BELIEFS OR AGNOSTIC BELIEFS. EVERYONE IS CAPABLE OF GOOD OR EVIL. SO THE VERY PREMISE OF THE OP IS INACCURATE AT BEST.
Got that, Cy? Because if you agree with that then we're pretty much done here. But if you continue to try and split a hair or claim I staged something that doesn't exist in the chronology of the posts, then you're just being insipidly stubborn with a heavy dose of foolish pride. Carry on.