Fear of Atheism

We need to talk about this. I'm an atheist. I am vocal. How am I a genocider Nazi? ... or are you complimenting me on not lowering myself to being a fascist globalist genocider Nazi?
I was overstating for fun.

most vocal atheists are Nazi genociders.... but not you...... you're special.

which is sad because morality is rational but most atheists are eugenicist mass murderers, which is clearly an immoral worldview.
 
I was overstating for fun.
Of course. We can both agree that atheism is not fascism ... although it might be globalist. Let me think about it.

most vocal atheists are Nazi genociders.... but not you...... you're special.
Am I a Libertarian Life-thriver?

which is sad because morality is rational but most atheists are eugenicist mass murderers, which is clearly an immoral worldview.
I'm having trouble parsing this.
 
Your first sentence is a regurgitation of a previous post that is more projection than addressing the key points of my responses. :rolleyes:

Puh-leeze, Cy! Spare us this lame attempt at smoke blowing and dodging .... you're not smart enough or adept enough to pull it off (only the smiling joker you see in the mirror nods in approval of your tactic). THIS ENTIRE THREAD IS BASED UPON DISCUSSION OF THOSE WHO REJECT (wait for it) RELIGION AND THE CONCEPT OF GOD AS BEING SOMEONE TO FEAR! YOU attempted to caste all atheists as prone to be (and I'll cut you some slack by inserting "potentially") morally deficient based on their beliefs. I correctly pointed out that "moralism" is no more or less imbued in human beings regardless of whether they are religious, atheist or agnostic ... as I pointed out the historic records of whole sale murder in the name of religion (i.e. Crusades, Jihads, Inquisition, America's and Australia's "Native" schools).

Now you keep waffling and BS'ing, name dropping objective/subjective morality do bolster your basic intention.

I'll dumb it down for you with regards to the subject title of this thread; THERE IS NO MORE NEED TO FEAR ATHEISM THAN THERE IS TO FEAR RELIGIOUS BELIEFS OR AGNOSTIC BELIEFS. EVERYONE IS CAPABLE OF GOOD OR EVIL. SO THE VERY PREMISE OF THE OP IS INACCURATE AT BEST.

Got that, Cy? Because if you agree with that then we're pretty much done here. But if you continue to try and split a hair or claim I staged something that doesn't exist in the chronology of the posts, then you're just being insipidly stubborn with a heavy dose of foolish pride. Carry on.

So you can't even admit I said nothing about religion, even though you tried to claim I did. Are you a drug addict?

Allergic to integrity and honesty, are you? The type of person who can't admit a mistake?


I've been asking this for two years and have never gotten a credible answer: how do electrons and quarks have innate objective morality and knowledge of absolute right and wrong?

They don't.

If all that exists is matter and energy, and humans are just collections of quarks and electrons, then all our values and morals are just based on opinion and popular consensus. That by definition is subjective morality. There is no possible to tap dance your way into spinning that as objective morality based on an innate and universal value of absolute right and wrong.

What I see on this thread are atheists trying to claim they believe in objective morality, without having to call it objective morality.
 
He lies about being a Christian. Sad.
Plato and Socrates believed in objective morality and values, and they weren't Christian, Jewish, or Muslim.
Christianity is irrelevant to the thread. It only appears in the thread because you have an emotional hostility to it.
 
So you can't even admit I said nothing about religion, even though you tried to claim I did. Are you a drug addict?

Allergic to integrity and honesty, are you? The type of person who can't admit a mistake?


I've been asking this for two years and have never gotten a credible answer: how do electrons and quarks have innate objective morality and knowledge of absolute right and wrong?

They don't.

If all that exists is matter and energy, and humans are just collections of quarks and electrons, then all our values and morals are just based on opinion and popular consensus. That by definition is subjective morality. There is no possible to tap dance your way into spinning that as objective morality based on an innate and universal value of absolute right and wrong.

What I see on this thread are atheists trying to claim they believe in objective morality, without having to call it objective morality.
We 've already done
that dance, Cy. You're tripping over your own insipidly stubborn & lame attempts
at word play. I'll leave you to it.
 
We 've already done
that dance, Cy. You're tripping over your own insipidly stubborn & lame attempts
at word play. I'll leave you to it.
The only people bringing up Christianity in this thread is you.

I'm frankly surprised at your lack of integrity to admit that I never brought up religion, and it was only the crystal meth haze that made you imagine I did.
 
Back
Top