First sedition indictment of a January 6th rioter.

S

Supposn

Verified User
First sedition indictment of a January 6th rioter.

Excerpted from the Associated Press link,
Seditious conspiracy: 11 Oath Keepers charged in Jan. 6 riot | AP News
“... These were the first seditious conspiracy charges levied in connection with the attack on Jan. 6, 2021. ...”.

Once a single January 6th rioter is convicted for sedition, there's certainly legal grounds to indict Donald Trump. Respectfully, Supposn
 
Evince, excerpted from the Associated Press link,
Seditious conspiracy: 11 Oath Keepers charged in Jan. 6 riot | AP News
“... These were the first seditious conspiracy charges levied in connection with the attack on Jan. 6, 2021. ...”.

Once a single January 6th rioter is convicted for sedition, there's certainly legal grounds to indict Donald Trump.
Refer to https://apnews.com/article/stewart-...insurrection-70019e1007132e8df786aaf77215a110 , Respectfully, Supposn[/QUOTE]
 
Supposn said:
First sedition indictment of a January 6th rioter.

Excerpted from the Associated Press link,
Seditious conspiracy: 11 Oath Keepers charged in Jan. 6 riot | AP News
“... These were the first seditious conspiracy charges levied in connection with the attack on Jan. 6, 2021. ...”.

Once a single January 6th rioter is convicted for sedition, there's certainly legal grounds to indict Donald Trump. Respectfully, Supposn
Click to expand...

Attempted proof by association. That's a fallacy, dude.
 
Supposn said:
Evince, excerpted from the Associated Press link,
Seditious conspiracy: 11 Oath Keepers charged in Jan. 6 riot | AP News
“... These were the first seditious conspiracy charges levied in connection with the attack on Jan. 6, 2021. ...”.

Once a single January 6th rioter is convicted for sedition, there's certainly legal grounds to indict Donald Trump.
Refer to https://apnews.com/article/stewart-...insurrection-70019e1007132e8df786aaf77215a110 , Respectfully, Supposn
Click to expand...

What sedition?
 
Into the Night said:
What sedition?
Click to expand...
Into the Night, there was a rumor of a seditious mob besieging the Washington D,C. Capitol Building to disrupt and possibly overturn the US. Senate certification of the duly chosen electors to represent their states within the U.S. Electoral College.

The rumor apparently continues to circulate. Associated Press recently carried a story of the the U.S. Department of Justice indicting the first 11 of persons they're filing in federal court for the crime of sedition against the United States. Respectfully, Supposn
 
Supposn said:
Into the Night, there was a rumor of a seditious mob besieging the Washington D,C. Capitol Building to disrupt and possibly overturn the US. Senate certification of the duly chosen electors to represent their states within the U.S. Electoral College.
Click to expand...
There was no electoral college. There Senate does not meet for this purpose. Congress has no authority to choose the electors for any State. There is nothing to overturn. What sedition?
Supposn said:
The rumor apparently continues to circulate. Associated Press recently carried a story of the the U.S. Department of Justice indicting the first 11 of persons they're filing in federal court for the crime of sedition against the United States. Respectfully, Supposn
Click to expand...
What sedition?
 
Supposn said:
First sedition indictment of a January 6th rioter.

Excerpted from the Associated Press link,
Seditious conspiracy: 11 Oath Keepers charged in Jan. 6 riot | AP News
“... These were the first seditious conspiracy charges levied in connection with the attack on Jan. 6, 2021. ...”.

Once a single January 6th rioter is convicted for sedition, there's certainly legal grounds to indict Donald Trump. Respectfully, Supposn
Click to expand...

Not a lawyer, but that may not be true. There has to be a link between the seditionists and Trump.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
before you begin your celebration dance, perhaps you could share your logic with us.......
Click to expand...
PostmodernProphet, (1) Once a single January 6th rioter is convicted for sedition,* we've established the federal court's determination that the besieging of the Capitol Building were seditious crimes;
(2) There's videos of Trump's speech within which he urged the crowd to go to the Capitol building and to the Senate;
(3) What's left is to prove Trump knew, or had good reason to know*and believe there were substantial numbers of people in the crowd who were*armed and/or in any manner likely to grievously behave violently. Respectfully, Supposn
 
Dutch Uncle said:
LOL It'll be interesting to see how it plays out. Trump is as nervous as a cat in a roomful of rocking chairs, which indicates guilt. :cool:
Click to expand...

I'm not sure, but I don't think many of their communications with the Toadstool would fall under the attorney-client privilege shield. Hiring an attorney to advocate for you in a lawsuit or indictment is one thing. But you saying "I'd like to burn that building to the ground" and an attorney telling you that that's illegal is probably not protected.
 
Supposn said:
PostmodernProphet, (1) Once a single January 6th rioter is convicted for sedition,* we've established the federal court's determination that the besieging of the Capitol Building were seditious crimes;
(2) There's videos of Trump's speech within which he urged the crowd to go to the Capitol building and to the Senate;
(3) What's left is to prove Trump knew, or had good reason to know*and believe there were substantial numbers of people in the crowd who were*armed and/or in any manner likely to grievously behave violently. Respectfully, Supposn
Click to expand...

It's kind of you to talk sensibly to PMP but your seed will fall upon the rocks rather than upon a fertile field. Everything you said is, of course, true. But to the Cult, it's all "fake news" and "hearsay" and "false flag ops" and a "witch hunt."
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
I'm not sure, but I don't think many of their communications with the Toadstool would fall under the attorney-client privilege shield. Hiring an attorney to advocate for you in a lawsuit or indictment is one thing. But you saying "I'd like to burn that building to the ground" and an attorney telling you that that's illegal is probably not protected.
Click to expand...

Agreed. Not a lawyer, but it seems that as soon as the lawyers become part of the conspiracy, that privilege is no longer valid.
 
Supposn said:
(3) What's left is to prove Trump knew, or had good reason to know*and believe there were substantial numbers of people in the crowd who were*armed and/or in any manner likely to grievously behave violently. Respectfully, Supposn
Click to expand...

thanks for admitting you haven't got a chance in hell of convicting Trump for sedition......
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Agreed. Not a lawyer, but it seems that as soon as the lawyers become part of the conspiracy, that privilege is no longer valid.
Click to expand...
Dutch Uncle and ThatOwlWoman, I'm not a lawyer but this matter is no big deal.
I would suppose that client-attorney privilege exists, regardless if the attorney doesn't or does directly or indirectly participate in the crime.
For an innocent attorney, the privilege's similar to the sanctuary of confessions to priests. Co-conspirators are not required to testify against themselves or their accomplices. Respectfully, Supposn
 
Hello Supposn,

Supposn said:
First sedition indictment of a January 6th rioter.

Excerpted from the Associated Press link,
Seditious conspiracy: 11 Oath Keepers charged in Jan. 6 riot | AP News
“... These were the first seditious conspiracy charges levied in connection with the attack on Jan. 6, 2021. ...”.

Once a single January 6th rioter is convicted for sedition, there's certainly legal grounds to indict Donald Trump. Respectfully, Supposn
Click to expand...

I am already satisfied that Donald Trump committed numerous crimes. Just waiting for him to get what's coming.

It needs to be done to repudiate the entire American right wing hate movement.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top