Minister of Truth
Practically Perfect
Well, I expect they are pissed at Obama, already, but they were also pissed at Bush...
Why would you care? You're going to sit at home or vote for some obscure third party dumbfuck.
Perhaps you need to start practicing it right now; repeat after me....Madam Secretary.
But in answer to your question; it wouldn’t be Trump, Graham, Santorum, Bush, Cruz or Pataki.
By the time the primaries get to California, the candidate will have already been decided; much like every election.
Repeat after me; Madam PRESIDENT, or Komrade.
Dear dumbfuck; it was a purposeful mistake. CRY buckTard CRY!
http://i1097.photobucket.com/albums/g354/gwassh0ppa/crying%20gif/_CRYINGtumblr_lg0znypSUC1qazkdco1_500.gif[IMG][/QUOTE]
Sure it was dumbfuck moron...
[QUOTE="Truth Detector, post: 1512108, member: 2316"]Repeat after me; Madam PRESIDENT...[/QUOTE]
lol
This past April marked the 150th Anniversary of the Democrats loss in the Civil War. I can't believe they're still a fucking political party...
mh:
In case you haven't read about it yet, the loss of segregationist states rights from the federally mandated civil rights and voting rights acts of the 1960s changed the Democratic party 100%.
I know you know that, but you are compelled to do that stupid talking points thing by the RW echo machine to try and fool the kids...
GOP voted for it at a better percentage than Dems did, of course. Let's also not forget that Everett Dirksen wrote some of the legislation, and was primarily responsible for defeating the filibuster. But this goes far beyond race and civil rights. The character of the Democratic Party has always been poor, and has always sought out a means to weaken America.
Same tired old bullshit; different day. You're such a boor.
Why isn't TD on here bragging about the success of Ryan and the RINOs
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/r...successful-year-for-democrats/article/2578707
Tell me again TD why I should support these cocksuckers?
And please don't say "it would have been worse under Reed and Pelosi"
Anyone who defends this travesty isn't a conservative
Trump is a progressive populist, not a conservative. While progressive populists exist in the republican party, it is my opinion that they should be relegated to the bottom tier. They are the least concerned with constitutional issues. I will not support Trump if he obtains the party's nomination.
Will you vote at all?
Any alternatives?
I always vote. The best alternative is to elect somebody who isn't a progressive populist as the nominee. The republican party does not do well when they run people who are not conservative.
I do not want 4 to 8 years of some buffoon telling me how it is Nabisco's fault they left and they need to be punished rather than noting that having the highest corporate tax rate in the world is causing companies to spend millions in other nations rather than here.
Do you think corporations PAY the highest corporate taxes in America?