French Weatherman Sent Packing For Exposing The Climate Change Scam.

Robo

Robo

Verified User
Philippe Verdier, weather chief at France Televisions, the country’s state broadcaster, reportedly sent on “forced holiday” for releasing book accusing top climatologists of “taking the world hostage”
Every night, France’s chief weatherman has told the nation how much wind, sun or rain they can expect the following day.

Now Philippe Verdier, a household name for his nightly forecasts on France 2, has been taken off air after a more controversial announcement – criticising the world’s top climate change experts.
Mr Verdier claims in the book Climat Investigation (Climate Investigation) that leading climatologists and political leaders have “taken the world hostage” with misleading data.

In a promotional video, Mr Verdier said: “Every night I address five million French people to talk to you about the wind, the clouds and the sun. And yet there is something important, very important that I haven’t been able to tell you, because it’s neither the time nor the place to do so.”
He added: “We are hostage to a planetary scandal over climate change – a war machine whose aim is to keep us in fear.”

http://www.globalclimatescam.com/ne...s-storm-over-book-questioning-climate-change/
 
The most accurate measures of temperature come from satellites. Since the start of these measurements in 1979, they show minor fluctuations and an insignificant net change in global temperature.
1.


Is the earth getting dangerously warm? Probably not, since the earth was warmer than it is now in 7000 of the last 10,000 years. By the way, does anybody know what the “right” amount of global heat is?
1.


Are we humans causing the warming by our carbon emissions? Actually, most of the “greenhouse effect” is due to water vapor, which makes one wonder why the EPA hasn’t designated H2O a harmful pollutant that they must regulate. Meteorologist Brian Sussman’s calculations in his book 1. “Climategate” show humanity’s share of the greenhouse effect as .9 of 1 percent.


Even global warming alarmists have tacitly conceded that CO2 is not the primary driver of climate change when they responded to the relative cooling in recent years by changing their story and telling us that the earth is likely to cool for a few decades in spite of still-increasing atmospheric CO2. Translation: other factors outweigh CO2 in their impact on global temperatures. Those other factors include variations in solar activity (accounting for 3/4 of the variability in earth’s temperature according to the Marshall Institute); changes in earth’s orbit and axis; albedo (reflectivity, meaning changes in cloud cover which are influenced by fluctuations in gamma ray activity); and volcanic and tectonic activity in the earth’s crust. For humans to presume that they are more than a gnat on an elephant’s rump in terms of impact on climate change is vain and delusive.
1. Shifting gears, let’s assume that the alarmists are right and that man-made CO2 emissions are making the world warmer. If so, what changes would they hope to accomplish and at what cost?
http://www.forbes.com/sites/markhendrickson/2012/09/16/climate-change-hoax-or-crime-of-the-century/
 
Robo said:
The most accurate measures of temperature come from satellites. Since the start of these measurements in 1979, they show minor fluctuations and an insignificant net change in global temperature.
1.


Is the earth getting dangerously warm? Probably not, since the earth was warmer than it is now in 7000 of the last 10,000 years. By the way, does anybody know what the “right” amount of global heat is?
1.


Are we humans causing the warming by our carbon emissions? Actually, most of the “greenhouse effect” is due to water vapor, which makes one wonder why the EPA hasn’t designated H2O a harmful pollutant that they must regulate. Meteorologist Brian Sussman’s calculations in his book 1. “Climategate” show humanity’s share of the greenhouse effect as .9 of 1 percent.


Even global warming alarmists have tacitly conceded that CO2 is not the primary driver of climate change when they responded to the relative cooling in recent years by changing their story and telling us that the earth is likely to cool for a few decades in spite of still-increasing atmospheric CO2. Translation: other factors outweigh CO2 in their impact on global temperatures. Those other factors include variations in solar activity (accounting for 3/4 of the variability in earth’s temperature according to the Marshall Institute); changes in earth’s orbit and axis; albedo (reflectivity, meaning changes in cloud cover which are influenced by fluctuations in gamma ray activity); and volcanic and tectonic activity in the earth’s crust. For humans to presume that they are more than a gnat on an elephant’s rump in terms of impact on climate change is vain and delusive.
1. Shifting gears, let’s assume that the alarmists are right and that man-made CO2 emissions are making the world warmer. If so, what changes would they hope to accomplish and at what cost?
http://www.forbes.com/sites/markhendrickson/2012/09/16/climate-change-hoax-or-crime-of-the-century/
Click to expand...

It's because this way when the "Scientists" proclaim that there is no global warming or climate change; the liberals will then be able to puff out their chests and state "Just think how bad it would have been, if we hadn't forced the world to make the changes in what they were doing; because without us forcing those changes, the world will be dying".
Then they'll sprain their collective arms, by patting each other on the back. :palm:
 
Robo said:
The most accurate measures of temperature come from satellites. Since the start of these measurements in 1979, they show minor fluctuations and an insignificant net change in global temperature.
1.


Is the earth getting dangerously warm? Probably not, since the earth was warmer than it is now in 7000 of the last 10,000 years. By the way, does anybody know what the “right” amount of global heat is?
1.


Are we humans causing the warming by our carbon emissions? Actually, most of the “greenhouse effect” is due to water vapor, which makes one wonder why the EPA hasn’t designated H2O a harmful pollutant that they must regulate. Meteorologist Brian Sussman’s calculations in his book 1. “Climategate” show humanity’s share of the greenhouse effect as .9 of 1 percent.


Even global warming alarmists have tacitly conceded that CO2 is not the primary driver of climate change when they responded to the relative cooling in recent years by changing their story and telling us that the earth is likely to cool for a few decades in spite of still-increasing atmospheric CO2. Translation: other factors outweigh CO2 in their impact on global temperatures. Those other factors include variations in solar activity (accounting for 3/4 of the variability in earth’s temperature according to the Marshall Institute); changes in earth’s orbit and axis; albedo (reflectivity, meaning changes in cloud cover which are influenced by fluctuations in gamma ray activity); and volcanic and tectonic activity in the earth’s crust. For humans to presume that they are more than a gnat on an elephant’s rump in terms of impact on climate change is vain and delusive.
1. Shifting gears, let’s assume that the alarmists are right and that man-made CO2 emissions are making the world warmer. If so, what changes would they hope to accomplish and at what cost?
http://www.forbes.com/sites/markhendrickson/2012/09/16/climate-change-hoax-or-crime-of-the-century/
Click to expand...

this article is from 2012 got anything newer, lol
 
It's library's religion
Which I mock joyfully
And you should to
Just don't get bent when I mock your bogus religion
 
Celticguy said:
More realize it's a scam
Click to expand...

Yes, but good thing they aren't the ones the world is listening to in this matter. It seems that the biggest polluters are the biggest deniers and it, as most things runs partisan in this country. The left seems to care about the planet and its future, while the right wants to continue in the same fashion as always.

Did you see pictures from Bejing recently? If it were up to the majority of the right, that is how the USA would still look.
 
Rana said:
Yes, but good thing they aren't the ones the world is listening to in this matter. It seems that the biggest polluters are the biggest deniers and it, as most things runs partisan in this country. The left seems to care about the planet and its future, while the right wants to continue in the same fashion as always.

Did you see pictures from Bejing recently? If it were up to the majority of the right, that is how the USA would still look.
Click to expand...

Pollution is pollution. CO2 as boogeyman is a fairy tale. I see even you ran away from climate change to pollution = bad immediately.
I don't blame you. Pollution is bad.
 
Rana said:
Yes, but good thing they aren't the ones the world is listening to in this matter. It seems that the biggest polluters are the biggest deniers and it, as most things runs partisan in this country. The left seems to care about the planet and its future, while the right wants to continue in the same fashion as always.

Did you see pictures from Bejing recently? If it were up to the majority of the right, that is how the USA would still look.
Click to expand...

Care to provide some facts that support your comment or are you just being a lying ass, again?
 
Celticguy said:
Pollution is pollution. CO2 as boogeyman is a fairy tale. I see even you ran away from climate change to pollution = bad immediately.
I don't blame you. Pollution is bad.
Click to expand...

Pollution is effecting climate change, I am sorry that you fail to see the correlation.
 
French weatherman gets fired for attempting to sell his book on the air.
BOBO sees that as proof that global warming is not a threat to mankind.
Poor BOBO
 
Rana said:
Yes, but good thing they aren't the ones the world is listening to in this matter. It seems that the biggest polluters are the biggest deniers .
Click to expand...



The Worst Polluter on Earth Is... The U.S. Federal Government
ivn.us/.../the-number-one-worst-polluter-on-earth-is-the-u-s-federal-gov...
Apr 18, 2012 - The Number One Worst Polluter on Earth Is…. ... Yet even as awful as many state and local governments throughout the country are, the federal government is still by far, the worst polluter. ... While the federal government is the world’s worst polluter, the Department of Defense alone ...

The U.S. government is the fourth biggest greenhouse gas polluter in the country

http://grist.org/list/the-u-s-gover...ggest-greenhouse-gas-polluter-in-the-country/
 
BOBO said:
The Worst Polluter on Earth Is... The U.S. Federal Government
ivn.us/.../the-number-one-worst-polluter-on-earth-is-the-u-s-federal-gov...
Apr 18, 2012 - The Number One Worst Polluter on Earth Is…. ... Yet even as awful as many state and local governments throughout the country are, the federal government is still by far, the worst polluter. ... While the federal government is the world’s worst polluter, the Department of Defense alone ...

The U.S. government is the fourth biggest greenhouse gas polluter in the country

http://grist.org/list/the-u-s-gover...ggest-greenhouse-gas-polluter-in-the-country/
Click to expand...

Grist.org? :rofl2:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top