Glowbull warming BS
- Thread starter Lionfish
- Start date
I’ll go with NASA’s view;
https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/
https://climate.nasa.gov/causes/
https://climate.nasa.gov/effects/
https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/
https://climate.nasa.gov/what-is-climate-change/
Common sense dictates that the their view is a bit more credible than that of cartoon tweets, theories from nobody contrarians, or individuals who can only rebuttal phrases and comical misemployment of fallacies
https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/
https://climate.nasa.gov/causes/
https://climate.nasa.gov/effects/
https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/
https://climate.nasa.gov/what-is-climate-change/
Common sense dictates that the their view is a bit more credible than that of cartoon tweets, theories from nobody contrarians, or individuals who can only rebuttal phrases and comical misemployment of fallacies
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
Strawman.
Man's stupidity or mother nature saying fuck off with this shit? I go with the former.
Texas hailstorm damages thousands of solar panels at 350-MW farm
Texas hailstorm damages thousands of solar panels at 350-MW farm
gfm7175
Mega MAGA
But.... but they're "the experts"...
