Head of Hamas government in Gaza eliminated

ZenMode said:
Irrelevant. Not condemning Hamas speaks for itself.
Click to expand...
You're still babbling. Once again you are using the buzzword "Hamas" without specifying whether you are referring to the unarmed Gazan civilian administrators or to Iran's militant terrorist proxy. As such, one must conclude that you are deliberately lying by intentionally conflating the two.
 
Uncensored2008 said:
That's a fucking lie.

There has never in history BEEN a country, nation, or state named "Palestine."
Click to expand...
There is a region called 'Palestine'. Most of it is currently in Israel.

Hamas tried to claim the name as their own, as a so-called 'nation'.
Uncensored2008 said:
The Ottoman Empire ruled the land until 1918, when they were destroyed in WWI after attacking Britain, France, Italy, and Spain. Then the British took over. The Brits broke up the region to try and create peace - but that is impossible when Muslims are involved.

Lebanon for the Christians - Muzzie Beasts invaded and overthrew it. Israel for the Jews - Muzzie Beasts instantly went to war, lost, and have engaged in terrorism ever since. Jordan and Syria for the Muslims - but Muslims demand that they have it all, Muhammad and his pet Djin Allah are some greedy fucks.
Click to expand...
Pretty accurate.
 
IBDaMann said:
You're still babbling. Once again you are using the buzzword "Hamas" without specifying whether you are referring to the unarmed Gazan civilian administrators or to Iran's militant terrorist proxy. As such, one must conclude that you are deliberately lying by intentionally conflating the two.
Click to expand...
You are still locked in this paradox, IBD.
 
Into the Night said:
You are still locked in this paradox, IBD.
Click to expand...
You're going to have to explain this paradox you fabricated for me.

Perhaps we can get to the bottom of your confusion by you explaining to whom you are referring when you write "Hamas." It seems that half the time you are referring to Gaza's unarmed civilian administrators as Iran's militant terrorist proxy, and the other half you are referring to one of Iran's militant terrorist proxies as unarmed civilian administrators. In every case, your conflation leaves you making absolutely absurd assertions. What is the best way to help you get back to making sense?
 
IBDaMann said:
You're going to have to explain this paradox you fabricated for me.

Perhaps we can get to the bottom of your confusion by you explaining to whom you are referring when you write "Hamas." It seems that half the time you are referring to Gaza's unarmed civilian administrators as Iran's militant terrorist proxy, and the other half you are referring to one of Iran's militant terrorist proxies as unarmed civilian administrators. In every case, your conflation leaves you making absolutely absurd assertions. What is the best way to help you get back to making sense?
Click to expand...
It is you that needs to make sense.

If Hamas is an "unarmed civilian administrat(ion)" and has no power over any of the combatant forces in Gaza, why would Israel negotiate anything with them? They have no power over the combatants and can't do anything to stop the fighting.

If Hamas were the military power in Gaza on the other hand, having complete control over the Palestinian combatant forces, then it makes sense for Israel to negotiate with them.
 
Into the Night said:
There is a region called 'Palestine'. Most of it is currently in Israel.
Click to expand...
The only Palestine that exists is the one in the hopes and dreams of those who want for Palestine to one day become reality. Until such time, the hopes and dreams of those who produce maps will be reflected in the maps that they produce.

For example, the maps of Bing, MapQuest and Yandex Maps reflect alignment with the hopes and dreams of those who yearn for the creation of Palestine, while Google Maps and Apple Maps align with the sentiments of the UN Security Council which neither recognizes any Palestine nor has any intention of creating one anytime soon, although the current situation could potentially change that. We'll see.

Into the Night said:
Hamas tried to claim the name as their own, as a so-called 'nation'.
Click to expand...
In this case, I presume you are referring to Gaza's now extinct unarmed administrators? No Iranian militant terrorist proxy has claimed to be a nation.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
It is you that needs to make sense.
Click to expand...
Your confusion stems from your irrational lust for genocide, not from my desire to keep children from dying.

T. A. Gardner said:
If Hamas is an "unarmed civilian administrat(ion)" and has no power over any of the combatant forces in Gaza,
Click to expand...
Wrong question. The question before you is to whom are you referring when you write "Hamas"? If you are correctly referring to Gaza's unarmed civilian administrators who are now all dead, you need to explain why you have been treating them as though they somehow attacked Israel, and why you don't recognize the IDF's genocide against the Arabs that they HATE. If you are incorrectly referring to one of Iran's militant terrorist proxies who did attack Israel on 7-October, you need to explain why you support the IDF exacting retribution on unafilliated and unarmed Arabs who never attacked Israel.

T. A. Gardner said:
why would Israel negotiate anything with them?
Click to expand...
"Them"? This is why we need to know to whom you are referring. Israel isn't negotiating with any unarmed Gazan administrators. Remember, they're all dead. Israel is negotiating with mediators for Qatar and Iran's proxy Al Qassam, because they have the hostages. There are no Gazan administrators in that equation. There are no Gazan civilians in that equation.

T. A. Gardner said:
If Hamas were the military power in Gaza on the other hand,
Click to expand...
To whom are you referring? The IDF is the only military power in Gaza.
 
IBDaMann said:
Death and desecration are the price to be paid for aiding Gazans. The IDF is working double-time to eradicate all of the Arabs, and then some meddling aid workers come along and prove to be totally counterproductive to the IDF's efforts. At least the aid workers' flashing red emergency aid lights helped the IDF target them more effectively, and quickly rid the field of the "problem."

Click to expand...
What is missing from this post ^ is condemnation , in the strongest terms, of the sub-human Zionist filth performing the decapitation and dismemberments.
 
IBDaMann said:
Nothing from the General Assembly is binding, or of any consequence. Only the Security Council carries any authority.
Click to expand...
Not wholly correct. UNGAR resolutions are to be taken seriously by all members that support democratic processes. Although not ' binding ' UNGAR resolutions still form the basics of international law. Further, the UNGA is empowered to override the Security Council should the latter not act appropriately to promote world peace.
That said, only Chapter VII SC resolutions can result in executive action.
 
moon said:
Not wholly correct. UNGAR resolutions are to be taken seriously by all members that support democratic processes. Although not ' binding ' UNGAR resolutions still form the basics of international law.
Click to expand...
I understand your sentiment and I am inclined to agree insofar as member states can better navigate international relations when they can see the big picture of how the member states feel on issues of relevance. UNGARs are nonbinding but extremely informative, so they do carry great value and serve as powerful tools for action and coordination.

Each member state determines how seriously it takes any given UNGAR but I should not have been as seemingly dismissive as I was.
 
moon said:
What is missing from this post ^ is condemnation , in the strongest terms
Click to expand...
That would ruin my satire.

moon said:
, of the sub-human Zionist filth performing the decapitation and dismemberments.
Click to expand...
I push for accountability in fair tribunals. I'm neither advocating for or against a Palestine and I am neither advocating for or against Zionism. War crimes and genocide are occurring in violation of relevant conventions and I want accountability.

The US is my country and is the only one I support.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
It's perfectly fine to be an Arab / Palestinian in Gaza, what's not so safe is being a member of Hamas, particularly a leader thereof. Blowing up terrorists and known enemy combatants is a normal part of international affairs and war. So, the IDF offing Hamas leaders is a perfectly viable combat tactic in a war, which is what Hamas and Israel are in. Otherwise, they wouldn't need to negotiate things like a CEASE FIRE!
Click to expand...
did you know israelis started Hamas?

it's one of those controlled opposition schemes.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top