Hillary supporter: Conservative whites too racist to vote for a black man

blackascoal said:
It would be naughahyde to someone who supports a corporate shill who thinks removing all restrictions, limitations, and regulations on corporations is the definition of freedom.

Iraq is a corporate war for profit.

Count me in with the "nutcases" who support a candidate that actually has a chance to win.

How should you be counted?
Click to expand...

Uh huh, Paul is a corporate shill. Meanwhile no one can point to any significant corporate/industry support while the supposedly anti corporate Dems are swimming in it.

Kucinich dropped out. You still think he has a chance, huh?
 
RStringfield said:
Haha look at racist Canada's pathetic history of voting for blacks.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Black_Canadians#Politicians.2C_public_servants.2C_and_soldiers

There are so few of them I think they listed a couple dog catchers.

Also, it turns out the racist canuks restricted immigration of blacks well into the 60s. They said it had to do with climate. You know black people don't like the cold. Yeah, right.
Click to expand...

You are truly an idiot.....Come talk to me when you dont have nooses displayed everywhere in the South....

CK
 
RStringfield said:
Uh huh, Paul is a corporate shill. Meanwhile no one can point to any significant corporate/industry support while the supposedly anti corporate Dems are swimming in it.

Kucinich dropped out. You still think he has a chance, huh?
Click to expand...

Kucinich?

Kucinich never had a chance and you won't find any comments of mine even remotely suggesting that he did.

I repeat .. anyone who believes that corporations should have free rein is a corporate shill.

Robber Barons.

It doesn't matter if his followers don't recognize that.
 
blackascoal said:
Kucinich?

Kucinich never had a chance and you won't find any comments of mine even remotely suggesting that he did.

I repeat .. anyone who believes that corporations should have free rein is a corporate shill.

Robber Barons.

It doesn't matter if his followers don't recognize that.
Click to expand...

how do corporations have free rein now?
 
Topspin said:
corps don't have free rein, your the biggest moron on the board bac
Click to expand...

I like when you post to me because I don't have spend much time in response. Your ignorance speaks for itself.

"Free Market" .. which Paul speaks as gospel is corporations with free rein.

One sentence is all it took.
 
your a moron have you never taken a business class in college.
NO you took basket weaving you pissant
 
blackascoal said:
Kucinich?

Kucinich never had a chance and you won't find any comments of mine even remotely suggesting that he did.
Click to expand...

You just said you support a candidate that actually has a chance to win, implying I do not. Were you not a supporter of Kucinich? Why is it that I may not choose a couple horses, but you may?

blackascoal said:
I repeat .. anyone who believes that corporations should have free rein is a corporate shill.

Robber Barons.

It doesn't matter if his followers don't recognize that.
Click to expand...

Good, then we agree Paul is not a corporate shill. Your argument is nothing but an idiotic strawman and whether you know it or not it is you who is the corporate shill.
 
CanadianKid said:
No dumbass....what I'm saying is Republicans are alot more racist...and very few would be inclined to vote for black candidates....
Click to expand...
And as I said initially, the race-baiters among us see no need to back up statements like these, with actual facts or evidence.

Some things never change..... :lolup:
 
blackascoal said:
I like when you post to me because I don't have spend much time in response. Your ignorance speaks for itself.

"Free Market" .. which Paul speaks as gospel is corporations with free rein.

One sentence is all it took.
Click to expand...

If you are a complete idiot who really has nothing more than a simplistic understanding of free market principles that's what it means. Free markets means no guarantees of limited liability, no subsidies, full enforcement of property rights against pollution, no corporate personhood (since they should not be taxed seperately), no grants of monopoly, etc..
 
RStringfield said:
If you are a complete idiot who really has nothing more than a simplistic understanding of free market principles that's what it means. Free markets means no guarantees of limited liability, no subsidies, full enforcement of property rights against pollution, no corporate personhood (since they should not be taxed seperately), no grants of monopoly, etc..
Click to expand...

There is not now nor has there ever been a completely lassiez-fare "free market" system because it leads to economic disaster.

Mixed economies is the reality of what in the best interests of actual people, not corporations.

Feel free to continue spouting about how brilliant you and Ron Paul are about the economy and monetary matters.

The word for it is moot.

Return to the Gold Standard ??

What fool would believe that bullshit?
 
your retarded, you just said there never has been then went on to said it leads to.
your fucking stupid uneducated left of air american partisan retard.
 
At least Obama isn't pointing out that "conservatives" will never vote for a woman....

This sounds like desperation to me. I like seeing Hillary desperate.

Who wants to bet that if ShrillBilly doesn't get it they'll divorce?
 
blackascoal said:
There is not now nor has there ever been a completely lassiez-fare "free market" system because it leads to economic disaster.

Mixed economies is the reality of what in the best interests of actual people, not corporations.

Feel free to continue spouting about how brilliant you and Ron Paul are about the economy and monetary matters.

The word for it is moot.

Return to the Gold Standard ??

What fool would believe that bullshit?
Click to expand...

All bluff and bluster. No substantive response at all. You never actually back up anything you say, BACkpedal. Youre just a dumbass blowing off steam to pretend you are something bigger. I see behind the curtain.
 
RStringfield said:
All bluff and bluster. No substantive response at all. You never actually back up anything you say, BACkpedal. Youre just a dumbass blowing off steam to pretend you are something bigger. I see behind the curtain.
Click to expand...

You're a legend in your own mind, I'm sure .. but that doesn't have shit to do with the REALITY that your candidate was a joke and is already yesterday's news.

You whine about a "substanative response" when you offered none .. nor do you even have the ability to demonstrate how "free markets" are preferable to a mixed economy .. or where in the fuck they exist.

Don't run dummy .. here's your chance to shine .. but my guess is that you'll just come back with Ron Paul manlove instead of evidence to demonstrate why America should have paid more attention to this idiot.

Spout on about your wisdom and how very smart Ron Paul is.

MOOT
 
blackascoal said:
You're a legend in your own mind, I'm sure .. but that doesn't have shit to do with the REALITY that your candidate was a joke and is already yesterday's news.
Click to expand...

Ad hom. And again, how well is Kucinich doing???

blackascoal said:
You whine about a "substanative response" when you offered none .. nor do you even have the ability to demonstrate how "free markets" are preferable to a mixed economy .. or where in the fuck they exist.

Don't run dummy .. here's your chance to shine .. but my guess is that you'll just come back with Ron Paul manlove instead of evidence to demonstrate why America should have paid more attention to this idiot.

Spout on about your wisdom and how very smart Ron Paul is.

MOOT
Click to expand...

I cited several explicit and specific reasons why and how corporations would have no free reign in a free market. You offered no response whatsoever.

You are chickenshit who has already run away from the debate. That's why you are throwing out diversions about "where a free market exists." What has that to do with the discussion? Nothing, you are attempting to divert attention because you have nothing to offer to back your contention that Paul is a corporate shill or the free markets imply corporations having free reign. You can't muster an argument beyond a single sentence or slogan. You are pathetic.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top