If God were real, you wouldn’t need a book

Great, an atheist who wants to introduce mystical, paranormal, transcendental, existential concepts into physics and cosmology classes.

No thanks. I want my physics & astronomy science classes presented to me on the basis of matter, energy, and spacetime.
Cosmology is not a branch of science. It is a religion. Cosmology is not physics.
He is not introducing anything mystical, paranormal, or transcendental. He exists.
 
When I was a teenage atheist is was mainly a renunciation of the Bible compared to scientific fact. Being young, I didn't get further past that concept; the conflict between those claiming the Earth was only 6000 years old vs. the scientific knowledge of the Big Bang, age of the Earth, dinosaurs, etc.

Agreed on religious extremists, and I include militant atheists in this, since they are pushing a belief system without evidence of that belief being true. They are two sides of the same illogical coin.
You are not an atheist, Sybil.
The age of Earth is unknown.
The Theory of the Big Bang is not a theory of science. It's a religion.
There is no such thing as a 'militant atheist'. An atheist has no religion to push.
Fallacy fallacy.
 
The leap of logic I eventually made is that scientific theory doesn't do anything to disprove god, the universal spirit, the Tao, or the eternal logos. They might just be evidence of it.

Some of the most brilliant minds in scientific history were convinced that lawful order in nature pointed to a law-giver.
No theory of science is evidence of a god or gods. Science is completely atheistic.
The Universe is unorganized.
 
"The type of slavery that existed in the US" (slavery is still present in the USA btw) is not the only type of slavery.

And slaves don't HAVE to be mistreated, you know. They COULD be treated properly instead.
Defending slavery.....nice.

giphy.gif
 
Last edited:
Right, the 6000 year old Earth is not taught in any church I've ever been to, and more importantly the age of the earth is not a requirement to be Christian.
The age of the Earth is unknown. You are correct that the age of the Earth has nothing to do with Christianity.
Now the Bible thumpers like IBDmann who want to introduce the mystical and the existential into physics and astronomy classes are something to be on guard against!
IBDaMann is an atheist. He doesn't thump any Bible.
 
Right. That’s what I said. "God's" rules, laws and behavior were unacceptable in Jesus' time. So, why would an all-knowing, perfect God endorse clearly immoral behavior.

Again, why would God endorse clearly immoral behavior while not clearly condemning other immoral behavior like slavery and child abuse?
RQAA. Void argument fallacy.
 
Please list the book, chapter, and verse(s) in which "God endorsed all kinds of [immoral] behavior" is "clearly state[d]". I want to see this for myself.
Lol...why, so you can ignore it or make excuses for it? You already rationalized God killing innocent children on Passover. There's absolutely no reason to believe you'll be any more reasonable with other examples.
 
I'll try again....

30% of the 10 Commandments are God talking about himself while ignoring obviously immoral behavior- child abuse and slavery. So I, a mere mortal, am saying to combine the three about God into one and add two new ones related to child abuse and slavery.
Where does God condone child abuse? Nothing in the gospel is immoral.

You still have not answered my questions. Stop evading.
Why is it that I, in a matter of seconds, can write a more moral 10 Commandments than the all-knowing creator of the universe, who is claimed to be the objective moral compass for all mankind?
You didn't.
Nevermind that God endorses killing your kids for back-talking and killed all of the first born children, an event, Passover, celebrated/recognized in today's Christian churches.
Stop making shit up.
 
Back
Top