For a while now, I've been suspicious of the 2020 U.S. Presidential Elections. This, despite the fact that I -wanted- Trump to lose. I've seen a fair amount that leads me to believe that election tampering probably took place. Recently, I found an article that at the Gateway Pundit introducing me to a Sheriff named Dar Leaf that I found interesting.
I brought it up in a thread whose subject had nothing to do with the 2020 Presidential Elections, and so when I got a response to it, decided that it would be better to transfer it to a new thread whose topic is in fact said Presidential Elections. So here's where that conversation was:
I'm not a "MAGA minion". As I've said many times, I turned against him before he was even elected President back in 2016. I wouldn't have voted for Hillary either if I were American, but I considered her to be the "lesser of evils".
When allegations of voter fraud first surfaced shortly after Biden was declared the winner in 2020, I was skeptical to the point that I didn't think it was worth checking out. But the allegations just kept on coming, and so I started to look into the evidence. I certainly believe that election injustice had happened before, specifically in the 2000 elections, where I believe Al Gore should have won and I acknowledged that it didn't just have to happen to democrats. At this point, I believe that Trump may well have lost due to election injustice.
I decided to do a search on Dar Leaf to see if there was any more news on how his endeavour to uncover election injustice was going. Turns out, there is. Here's another article on him from yesterday:
Sheriff in Michigan's Barry County vows to fight subpoena for election probe records | ArcaMax
You can, ofcourse, just dismiss all of Sheriff Dar Leaf's efforts as "consistent repetition" or some such. Perhaps you would care to enlighten me and anyone else reading as to what you believe is being repeated? I mean, I'd certainly agree that a lot of efforts have been made to provide evidence that the 2020 elections weren't properly run in various places, but I think we can agree that the important thing should be, do those allegations have merit? As I said, at first, I didn't think so, but the more information I learned on the subject, the more I've been come to believe the opposite.
I brought it up in a thread whose subject had nothing to do with the 2020 Presidential Elections, and so when I got a response to it, decided that it would be better to transfer it to a new thread whose topic is in fact said Presidential Elections. So here's where that conversation was:
I'm not a "MAGA minion". As I've said many times, I turned against him before he was even elected President back in 2016. I wouldn't have voted for Hillary either if I were American, but I considered her to be the "lesser of evils".
When allegations of voter fraud first surfaced shortly after Biden was declared the winner in 2020, I was skeptical to the point that I didn't think it was worth checking out. But the allegations just kept on coming, and so I started to look into the evidence. I certainly believe that election injustice had happened before, specifically in the 2000 elections, where I believe Al Gore should have won and I acknowledged that it didn't just have to happen to democrats. At this point, I believe that Trump may well have lost due to election injustice.
I decided to do a search on Dar Leaf to see if there was any more news on how his endeavour to uncover election injustice was going. Turns out, there is. Here's another article on him from yesterday:
Sheriff in Michigan's Barry County vows to fight subpoena for election probe records | ArcaMax
You can, ofcourse, just dismiss all of Sheriff Dar Leaf's efforts as "consistent repetition" or some such. Perhaps you would care to enlighten me and anyone else reading as to what you believe is being repeated? I mean, I'd certainly agree that a lot of efforts have been made to provide evidence that the 2020 elections weren't properly run in various places, but I think we can agree that the important thing should be, do those allegations have merit? As I said, at first, I didn't think so, but the more information I learned on the subject, the more I've been come to believe the opposite.
. I'm holding on to the ragged edge of hope that he read further, but I'm thinking you're right, at least in that he got no further than "Gateway Pundit".
I wonder if Fox will cover it?