Is Bill Clinton a pedophile too?

Clinton is a philanderer that is a known fact.

Lots of folks visit the DR; in fact I've been there myself. Does that make me a philanderer?


There's just as much evidence tying you to the sex trade in the DR as you've provided to tie Clinton to the orgies at his friend's property.
 
So in other words, your including Rush into this conversation is nothing more than a diversion.

Christie said no such thing, nor made any such allusion.

Sadly, you proclaimed Clinton guilty without providing a single scrap of evidence to back your nonsensical claim.
 
The logic of this guilt by association escapes me. Does anyone agree with the following?

-Jerry Sandusky is a pedophile
-Joe Paterno was his friend and defended him, so Joe Pa was a pedophile
-Thousands of Penn St students defended Joe Pa and are pedophiles
-So are the countless alumni who showed solidarity
 
The logic of this guilt by association escapes me. Does anyone agree with the following?

-Jerry Sandusky is a pedophile
-Joe Paterno was his friend and defended him, so Joe Pa was a pedophile
-Thousands of Penn St students defended Joe Pa and are pedophiles
-So are the countless alumni who showed solidarity

I do believe that the idea of "association", means something more then just a passing acquaintance or support.
 
If there's a mathematician here, he could probably help up compose a logic equation for this, sort of like...

(a) x (b) = (c)

a: number of times Bill Clinton visited the island
b: number of times Bill Clinton visited the island with Hillary
c: degree of certainty that Bill Clinton was hitting it on the island
 
If there's a mathematician here, he could probably help up compose a logic equation for this, sort of like...

(a) x (b) = (c)

a: number of times Bill Clinton visited the island
b: number of times Bill Clinton visited the island with Hillary
c: degree of certainty that Bill Clinton was hitting it on the island


I think this would be more correct: (a) / (b) = (c)
 
The logic of this guilt by association escapes me. Does anyone agree with the following?

-Jerry Sandusky is a pedophile
-Joe Paterno was his friend and defended him, so Joe Pa was a pedophile
-Thousands of Penn St students defended Joe Pa and are pedophiles
-So are the countless alumni who showed solidarity


If Joe Pa was a known pervert, rapist and buggered young men, then you may have a analogy that makes some sense...
 
Back
Top