I guess it comes down to perception but I've heard it categorized that way many times.
For example here it comes up during a discussion about tennis:
I'm disappointed that you singled out Jennifer Capriati for her choice of warm-up music last week, but let Andy Roddick off the hook. Roddick also deserved a verbal slap on the wrist for his choice of Bruce Springsteen's Born In The U.S.A., which is not, I repeat NOT, a patriotic song. In fact, it is a very anti-American song which details how a person was beaten down his whole life, forced into the military, and treated like dirt after Vietnam -- all because he had the extreme misfortune to be born in the U.S.A. Roddick was probably clueless about this, but I think that somebody around him or the tournament officials should have paid attention and made him aware of the song's content.
--Sierra, New York
Fair point. And you're right about Born in the U.S.A. Though it's usually played as an American anthem (particularly in NASCAR circles), the lyrics to Born in the U.S.A. are something other than patriotic. I still would submit that there is a huge difference between choosing a well-known song that one (cluelessly, perhaps) thinks is patriotic; and choosing one whose very title is both violent and hostile. A sample of the lyrics to the Outkast song Bombs Over Baghdad, which Capriati requested be played over the P.A. system as she walked onto the court before a match in Key Biscayne.
Don't pull the thang out, unless you plan to bang
[Choir] Bombs over Baghdad!
[Dre] Yeah! Ha ha yeah!
Don't even bang unless you plan to hit something
[Choir] Bombs over Baghdad!
[Dre] Yeah! Uhh-huh
The moral of the story: particularly in an international sport, players ought to leave politics out of their song selections. (And no truth to the rumor that Capriati is considering Philadelphia Freedom for her next match.) ... Speaking of the Capster:
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/inside_game/jon_wertheim/news/2003/04/07/mailbag/