Is The United States Drug War Unconstitutional?

[Truth Detector]

You're losing it. Legalization will get the cartels out of the business, and get the violence out of it. And yes, citizens should be allowed to have grenades and machine guns. Your sarcasm has backfired. doh.

Wrong again shit-for-brains; but at least you are consistent.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Yes, it is unconstitutional to prohibit mind altering drugs used by idiots, morons and the loser dregs of society. Open the flood gates and allow the drug cartels to profit by killing our citizens and causing mayhem.

who owns your body. you? or the US Gov?

Hell, while we're at it, let's just disband the police; who needs them right? We should also allow the citizens to own hand grenades and machine guns. After all, the Constitution doesnt limit what it means to "bear arms"!!

in the last century, governments have killed over 100 million of their own citizens. how bad can anarchy be? and we the people are the main power in this country, so we should be able to own grenades and full autos.

 

[Robo]

Yes, it is unconstitutional to prohibit mind altering drugs used by idiots, morons and the loser dregs of society. Open the flood gates and allow the drug cartels to profit by killing our citizens and causing mayhem.

Just for your own fucking personal information Jerkoff, the Drug Cartels only exist now because of the unconstitutional insane Drug War. ”Illegalization” of some drugs is what makes them a tax-free extremely profitable products for criminals, you clueless brain-dead RINO idiot! Furthermore if you lived in the real world you’d know that the Drug War HAS already “opened the flood gates.” The Drug War is a miserable expensive violent failure numb-nuts!!!!!

 

[Rune]

Dear dumbass; you might want to re-read the thread topic. It is about the "drug war" being conducted by the Feds as being unconstitutional.

You're selective ignorance is hardly a surprise though.

The heroin is brought into this country by the CIA to weaken the black man and keep down the whites who might be troublesome.
The main prosecution is against pot. If you were not a moron, you would know that.
Junkies, crackheads , speedfreaks, and special effects tweakers all solve their own problems soon enough. Not much need to worry about them.

Alcoholics kill innocent people all the time, but that is socially acceptable, cops, judges, lawyers and politicians get shitfaced every day and fuck over someone's life.
The weed hurts none and helps many and a great many users are in jail for nonviolent possession of tiny amounts of pot.

Your general ignorance is hardly surprising.

 

[Celticguy]

Retard; how can a black market exist for something legal?

Because its taxed. Look into black market cigarettes in NYC.

 

[putsometrebleinit]

The heroin is brought into this country by the CIA to weaken the black man and keep down the whites who might be troublesome.

And musicians

 

[Robo]

If it is Constitutional to shoot up heroin, who do you think will be supplying it? A Government sponsored heroin manufacturer?

That would be totally up to the States as long as they didn’t outlaw some drugs. The Constitution ”reserves” those kinds of powers to the States ”respectively.” Why don’t you read the Constitution and become a lesser idiot?

If the Government decides to compete with cartels by regulating and taxing heroin, do you naively think the cartels would not conspire to undercut their costs and sell it cheaper in a black market?

Only if and when States revert to super RINO authoritarianism like they have done with tobacco products and their authoritarian ungodly taxing thereof, could they reestablish a black market for the cartels. Otherwise, like alcohol which nearly every politician lives on States keep taxes reasonable, there’d be no room for large tax-free cartel profits. Do you have a dime’s worth of common sense? Have you got a single rational clue?

I'm sure a simple minded cluekess buffoon like you would think that legalizing deadly drugs based on some moronically naive concept of Constitutional ideological purity will cause the illegal drug cartels making BILLIONS to just throw up their hands in dispair and call it quits.

Actually you’re irrational hysterical premise is severely flawed. More people die every year from the effects of tobacco, alcohol and other physician prescribed legal drugs and talking on or texting on cell phones while driving than die from abusing illegal street drugs. Besides, if illegal street drugs were legal and regulated by the States respectively, the probability that they would be safer is a rational opinion. Do you understand ”RATIONAL?” Oh! That’s right, you’re the forum Jerkoff, huh?

The only dunces not thinking are dimwitted naive unthinking twits like you who make incredibly stupid arguments that suggest that drugs are a Constiturional right while claiming the FDA is protecting its citizens from "drug" companies.

We should all know by now you love BIG government at least as much as the leftist you pretend to abhor. Of course the FDA is one of your heroes. Who didn’t know that?

Relative to a constitutional right to use all drugs, read the 9th amendment. The only possible disclaimer for people to assume every and any right they choose for themselves, would be everything and anything we assume as our rights IS constitutional as long as the act thereof violates NO right or rights of others.

So genius, tell the class what right of yours or anybody else’s is violated by your neighbor’s drug use. Tell us why if he’s drink as a skunk on booze he’s cool but if he’s stoned on some drug he goes to jail. Tell us how you own your own body, but you and your BIG fucking government owns everybody else’s body too. Then tell us how the multi billions of $ government spends on the Drug War is working for a better America. Then tell the class how the Drug War became constitutional without a constitutional amendment when the government found it necessary to amend the Constitution for the prohibition of alcohol.

You can't begin to comprehend the irony because you really are too fucking ignorant and stupid to grasp even the most obvious.

I looked up “stupid, “clueless” and “moron” in the dictionary and every word had a picture of you aside it Jerkoff!!!!!

 

[Rune]

That would be totally up to the States as long as they didn’t outlaw some drugs. The Constitution ”reserves” those kinds of powers to the States ”respectively.” Why don’t you read the Constitution and become a lesser idiot?



Only if and when States revert to super RINO authoritarianism like they have done with tobacco products and their authoritarian ungodly taxing thereof, could they reestablish a black market for the cartels. Otherwise, like alcohol which nearly every politician lives on States keep taxes reasonable, there’d be no room for large tax-free cartel profits. Do you have a dime’s worth of common sense? Have you got a single rational clue?



Actually you’re irrational hysterical premise is severely flawed. More people die every year from the effects of tobacco, alcohol and other physician prescribed legal drugs and talking on or texting on cell phones while driving than die from abusing illegal street drugs. Besides, if illegal street drugs were legal and regulated by the States respectively, the probability that they would be safer is a rational opinion. Do you understand ”RATIONAL?” Oh! That’s right, you’re the forum Jerkoff, huh?



We should all know by now you love BIG government at least as much as the leftist you pretend to abhor. Of course the FDA is one of your heroes. Who didn’t know that?

Relative to a constitutional right to use all drugs, read the 9th amendment. The only possible disclaimer for people to assume every and any right they choose for themselves, would be everything and anything we assume as our rights IS constitutional as long as the act thereof violates NO right or rights of others.

So genius, tell the class what right of yours or anybody else’s is violated by your neighbor’s drug use. Tell us why if he’s drink as a skunk on booze he’s cool but if he’s stoned on some drug he goes to jail. Tell us how you own your own body, but you and your BIG fucking government owns everybody else’s body too. Then tell us how the multi billions of $ government spends on the Drug War is working for a better America. Then tell the class how the Drug War became constitutional without a constitutional amendment when the government found it necessary to amend the Constitution for the prohibition of alcohol.



I looked up “stupid, “clueless” and “moron” in the dictionary and every word had a picture of you aside it Jerkoff!!!!!

Well said sir, but a complete waste of time. The retard doesn't listen or learn.

 

[Robo]

Well said sir, but a complete waste of time. The retard doesn't listen or learn.

The retard is a clueless BIG government authoritarian RINO, a despiser of our Constitution and a first class moron. I only communicate with the idiot to watch him eat his toes and prove his pure stupidity.

 

[Robo]

We should also allow the citizens to own hand grenades and machine guns. After all, the Constitution doesnt limit what it means to "bear arms"!!

Here here!!! Agreed!!! There's absolutely no sane and logical reason to prevent honest peaceful citizens from having at least equal weaponry as the criminals that would attack them and do them harm including the criminals in BIG authoritarian government. An M1A1/2 Abrams main battle tank would be a fine addition to any peaceful citizen's SELF DEFENSE weapons collection and NO I'm not kidding!!!!!

 

[Truth Detector]

who owns your body. you? or the US Gov?

Of course you own your own body. And if you want to be an idiot and kill yourself with drugs, you can do it on your own time without the sanction of Government or your neighbors. But society does not need to sanction, nor support really stupid behavior.

You're too young and clueless to comprehend the purpose of organized civil society to promote progress and prosperity. You are stuck on this naive ideological purity idealism that merely promotes chaos and decline. You have an uninformed historic perspective that suggests naïveté and youth, or outright stupidity and ignorance.

in the last century, governments have killed over 100 million of their own citizens. how bad can anarchy be?

Spoken from a naive and clueless historical perspective. Anyone who argues for anarchy is incredibly naive or incredibly ignorant. If you want to see how well it works, just study Somalia, or any of many nations that have no rule of law.

Of course, if you like Somalia style living, you'll love anarchy and unrestricted weapons.

Trully; such comments are too stupid for prime time.

and we the people are the main power in this country, so we should be able to own grenades and full autos.

Once again you illustrate that your not Smarter than anyone, but rather, barely smarter than an earthworm with such comments. .

 

[Truth Detector]

Just for your own fucking personal information Jerkoff, the Drug Cartels only exist now because of the unconstitutional insane Drug War. ”Illegalization” of some drugs is what makes them a tax-free extremely profitable products for criminals, you clueless brain-dead RINO idiot! Furthermore if you lived in the real world you’d know that the Drug War HAS already “opened the flood gates.” The Drug War is a miserable expensive violent failure numb-nuts!!!!!

Another low information clueless moron who thinks that legalizing all drugs will suddenly end criminal behavior, drug cartels and not lead to societal deline?

Really, you're too fucking stupid to comprehend the utter clueless stupidity that erupts from your keyboard. No wonder you spend so much time here desperately removing any doubt what a clueless retard you are.

 

[Truth Detector]

The heroin is brought into this country by the CIA to weaken the black man and keep down the whites who might be troublesome.
The main prosecution is against pot. If you were not a moron, you would know that.
Junkies, crackheads , speedfreaks, and special effects tweakers all solve their own problems soon enough. Not much need to worry about them.
U
Alcoholics kill innocent people all the time, but that is socially acceptable, cops, judges, lawyers and politicians get shitfaced every day and fuck over someone's life.
The weed hurts none and helps many and a great many users are in jail for nonviolent possession of tiny amounts of pot.

Your general ignorance is hardly surprising.

You're not just stupid, you're borderline retarded with such comments. But I can't say I am surprised you are this painfully stupid and erupt with such retarded clueless nonsense.

I'm betting you voted for Obama.

 

[Truth Detector]

Because its taxed. Look into black market cigarettes in NYC.

Bingo; but don't expect clueless low information voting retards to comprehend the OBVIOUS.

 

[Truth Detector]

That would be totally up to the States as long as they didn’t outlaw some drugs. The Constitution ”reserves” those kinds of powers to the States ”respectively.” Why don’t you read the Constitution and become a lesser idiot?

Only if and when States revert to super RINO authoritarianism like they have done with tobacco products and their authoritarian ungodly taxing thereof, could they reestablish a black market for the cartels. Otherwise, like alcohol which nearly every politician lives on States keep taxes reasonable, there’d be no room for large tax-free cartel profits. Do you have a dime’s worth of common sense? Have you got a single rational clue?

Actually you’re irrational hysterical premise is severely flawed. More people die every year from the effects of tobacco, alcohol and other physician prescribed legal drugs and talking on or texting on cell phones while driving than die from abusing illegal street drugs. Besides, if illegal street drugs were legal and regulated by the States respectively, the probability that they would be safer is a rational opinion. Do you understand ”RATIONAL?” Oh! That’s right, you’re the forum Jerkoff, huh?

We should all know by now you love BIG government at least as much as the leftist you pretend to abhor. Of course the FDA is one of your heroes. Who didn’t know that?

Relative to a constitutional right to use all drugs, read the 9th amendment. The only possible disclaimer for people to assume every and any right they choose for themselves, would be everything and anything we assume as our rights IS constitutional as long as the act thereof violates NO right or rights of others.

So genius, tell the class what right of yours or anybody else’s is violated by your neighbor’s drug use. Tell us why if he’s drink as a skunk on booze he’s cool but if he’s stoned on some drug he goes to jail. Tell us how you own your own body, but you and your BIG fucking government owns everybody else’s body too. Then tell us how the multi billions of $ government spends on the Drug War is working for a better America. Then tell the class how the Drug War became constitutional without a constitutional amendment when the government found it necessary to amend the Constitution for the prohibition of alcohol.

I looked up “stupid, “clueless” and “moron” in the dictionary and every word had a picture of you aside it Jerkoff!!!!!

Another clueless irrational rant from an ignoramus stuck permanently on stupid and naive. If you actually looked up the definition of stupid retard and moron, it would be like looking in a mirror dumbass.

Carry on; it is always best to merely point at clueless naive idealistictic retards like you and laugh rather than expect the possibly of coherent intelligent debate.

 

[Truth Detector]

That would be totally up to the States as long as they didn’t outlaw some drugs. The Constitution ”reserves” those kinds of powers to the States ”respectively.” Why don’t you read the Constitution and become a lesser idiot?

Only if and when States revert to super RINO authoritarianism like they have done with tobacco products and their authoritarian ungodly taxing thereof, could they reestablish a black market for the cartels. Otherwise, like alcohol which nearly every politician lives on States keep taxes reasonable, there’d be no room for large tax-free cartel profits. Do you have a dime’s worth of common sense? Have you got a single rational clue?

Actually you’re irrational hysterical premise is severely flawed. More people die every year from the effects of tobacco, alcohol and other physician prescribed legal drugs and talking on or texting on cell phones while driving than die from abusing illegal street drugs. Besides, if illegal street drugs were legal and regulated by the States respectively, the probability that they would be safer is a rational opinion. Do you understand ”RATIONAL?” Oh! That’s right, you’re the forum Jerkoff, huh?

We should all know by now you love BIG government at least as much as the leftist you pretend to abhor. Of course the FDA is one of your heroes. Who didn’t know that?

Relative to a constitutional right to use all drugs, read the 9th amendment. The only possible disclaimer for people to assume every and any right they choose for themselves, would be everything and anything we assume as our rights IS constitutional as long as the act thereof violates NO right or rights of others.

So genius, tell the class what right of yours or anybody else’s is violated by your neighbor’s drug use. Tell us why if he’s drink as a skunk on booze he’s cool but if he’s stoned on some drug he goes to jail. Tell us how you own your own body, but you and your BIG fucking government owns everybody else’s body too. Then tell us how the multi billions of $ government spends on the Drug War is working for a better America. Then tell the class how the Drug War became constitutional without a constitutional amendment when the government found it necessary to amend the Constitution for the prohibition of alcohol.

I looked up “stupid, “clueless” and “moron” in the dictionary and every word had a picture of you aside it Jerkoff!!!!!

Well said sir, but a complete waste of time. The retard doesn't listen or learn.

What a shocker; two irrational retards agreeing with each other!!

 

[Truth Detector]

The retard is a clueless BIG government authoritarian RINO, a despiser of our Constitution and a first class moron. I only communicate with the idiot to watch him eat his toes and prove his pure stupidity.

Wrong again shit-for-brains; you post here to remove any doubt what a clueless irrational retard you really are.

You're doing a hell of a job too shit-for-brains. Never let reality, facts or intelligence get in the way of your dimwitted canards! It would lose the entertainment value of watching dunces like you look really stupid.

 

[Robo]

Another clueless irrational rant from an ignoramus stuck permanently on stupid and naive. If you actually looked up the definition of stupid retard and moron, it would be like looking in a mirror dumbass.

Carry on; it is always best to merely point at clueless naive idealistictic retards like you and laugh rather than expect the possibly of coherent intelligent debate.

Wow!!!!! What a great response!!!!! Just full of substantive well thought out arguments. You truly are a fucking genius!!!!!.....NOT

 

[Truth Detector]

Here here!!! Agreed!!! There's absolutely no sane and logical reason to prevent honest peaceful citizens from having at least equal weaponry as the criminals that would attack them and do them harm including the criminals in BIG authoritarian government. An M1A1/2 Abrams main battle tank would be a fine addition to any peaceful citizen's SELF DEFENSE weapons collection and NO I'm not kidding!!!!!

LMAO; I know you're not kidding. You really are THAT retarded!!

 

[Truth Detector]

Wow!!!!! What a great response!!!!! Just full of substantive well thought out arguments. You truly are a fucking genius!!!!!.....NOT

As opposed to the whacked out retarded prose you post? Irony. Again, I merely point at idiots like you and laugh. It would be a waste of time to attempt any rational or coherent debate with idiots like you.