My niece is posting on her fb page this morning that it is a lot of media hype, no surprise there. My nephew has been there four years. She says she is planning a shopping trip to Seoul and laughed about it.
I am relieved.
They're two autonomous nations. It's not like NK has to do anything China says. That'd be like saying we're responsible for the actions of Mexico.
China has their own little squabble with them. They don't really see the problem the same way we do. That is, they are not really that concerned about NK becoming a nuclear power.
http://koreajoongangdaily.joinsmsn.com/news/article/article.aspx?aid=2969614
BEIJING - Pyongyang has allegedly asked Beijing to send them an envoy in order to improve their soured relations, but Beijing turned it down, seen as a warning regarding the regime’s recent warmongering rhetoric.
Multiple sources in Beijing told the JoongAng Ilbo on Tuesday that “North Korea asked China to send a high-ranking envoy at the deputy-ministerial-level, but China rejected it.
“China said ‘if they want an envoy, North Korea should send their envoy [to China] first,’” the source said.
The neocons are creaming their jeans over this just like they did whenever his daddy cried for attention.
If Obama nuked them and NK became a hole in the ground they'd be the first ones in line crying foul.
Howie got sexually tickled when he read the "Get Big Dick" part of that ad.
There sure are a lot of supposed heterosexuals on here preoccupied with the sex life of a mo.
It is well known because of clintons weakness that Osama bin Laden was emboldened to attack us nitwit. I don't want war but i do not take kindly to threats from a guy with his hand on a nuke button, whether it can hit us or not.
It is well known because of clintons weakness that Osama bin Laden was emboldened to attack us nitwit. I don't want war but i do not take kindly to threats from a guy with his hand on a nuke button, whether it can hit us or not.
If they attack us, you don't think we should take them out?hmmm.....
If they attack us, you don't think we should take them out?
I think you missed the obvious error in your post. That is what I think. Read the bolded portions again... tell us what is wrong with those two statements being together.
"well known" among Clinton haters, maybe. I would dare say there is no consensus on your first point, except among like-minded troglodytes such as yourself.
Now, there's revisionist history I never heard!
Clinton was president on 9/11?
Now, there's revisionist history I never heard!
Clinton was president on 9/11?
Don't be a dumbass oops sorry you can't help it, Clintons weakness when not taking Osama when he had the chance was what Osama saw as a weakness.
a wacko right wing blog
... were you TRYING to prove my point, or was it accidental?
Don't be a dumbass oops sorry you can't help it, Clintons weakness when not taking Osama when he had the chance was what Osama saw as a weakness.