I noticed neither of you "free speech" advocates can refute the substance of my position.
Jesus Christ, this will be like shooting fish in a barrel.
#1. How do you completely refute an incomplete sentence?
#2. How can we refute a statement in which you provide no evidence to support. It's not our job to refute your lies. Its your job to defend them.
#3. Your incomplete statement is a Strawman argument. Liberals don't claim profits to be governments business, that's your Strawman.
#4. It can be argued that your entire statement is a "liberal myth" otherwise known to the rest of the world as a lie. (I completely expect my little play on words here to go right over your head.)
#5. Can you site a reference from a liberal source that this is an ideological platform for them? First you'll need to define what is a liberal, who is a liberal and that all liberals believe in your statement. Please support this claim with evidence not rhetoric.
See, I told ya'll this would be like shooting fish in a barrel. See why I keep saying "Don't feed the troll"?
His comments (grenades) are easier to shoot down then a two dollar kite and it encourages him to just throw his rhetorical hand grenades while contributing absolutely nothing to either the debate or exchange of ideas here. This trolls only intent is a bigoted attempt to marginalize another group of people and I say "Who needs that?"
If we ignore him, he will go away.
