WSJ isn’t anonymous, and if it is bogus what is Musk now threatening the whistleblower (https://www.politico.eu/article/elo...on-leakers-new-york-times-briefing-china-war/)you have zero proof of your claims. you read something fron an anonymous source, and run around like a chicken little
the part most hilarious is the sheer retarded nature of your claims. he does have some security clearance - yet you pretended he is just a normal guy
WSJ is not the source - your source is " according to anonymous American officials "WSJ isn’t anonymous, and if it is bogus what is Musk now threatening the whistleblower (https://www.politico.eu/article/elo...on-leakers-new-york-times-briefing-china-war/)
Musk is a private citizen, supposedly were told just some advisor to the President, he is not part of the Chain of Command, he hasn’t been screened for such a top level meeting, and, has serious vested interest in both Government contracts here and business interests in China
But the WSJ, Murdoch’s WSJ, found it credible enough to run the storyWSJ is not the source - your source is " according to anonymous American officials "
~watching you fling poo again
they did not lie about the source as you didBut the WSJ, Murdoch’s WSJ, found it credible enough to run the story
The “story” has been confirmed by the WH and State Dept along with four of the participants in the chat answering questions infront of the Senate todaythey did not lie about the source as you did
*oh - sorry - lying implies you aren't a confused retard. my apologies
it was confirmed that no top secret info was shared.The “story” has been confirmed by the WH and State Dept along with four of the participants in the chat answering questions infront of the Senate today
Got anything relevant?
“Confirmed” by who?it was confirmed that no top secret info was shared.
back at you retardo
wow - your level of idiocy continues to grow“Confirmed” by who?
All three of them today testified that the air strikes were exposed before they occurred, meaning if the journalist wanted, he could have text the Houthi and informed them so they could could prepare their anti aircraft armaments, fact. And your telling us it was no big deal cause “no top secret info was shared?”
My bad, but just the same, even more relevant, “confirmed” by who?wow - your level of idiocy continues to grow
this is about Elon Musk and china dipshit
~"my bad. sorry for proving again that I drool on the keyboard"My bad, but just the same, even more relevant, “confirmed” by who?
Again, “confirmed” by who?~"my bad. sorry for proving again that I drool on the keyboard"
the entire meeting was confirmed to of not happened. maybe as a result of the fake news report, and maybe not - but either way fucking wake up. you are coming off as a huge moron passing off week old fake news
by the adults derp stickAgain, “confirmed” by who?
Oh, I see, an unannounced meeting between Musk and Hegseth at the Pentagon is surprisingly exposed in the media and suddenly Musk and Hegseth say nothing was discussed, got it. Did you think after getting caught they were going to come out and say Hegseth was showing Musk the Pentagon’s plans on China?by the adults derp stick
you selectively believe anonymous sources when it serves your initial viewsOh, I see, an unannounced meeting between Musk and Hegseth at the Pentagon is surprisingly exposed in the media and suddenly Musk and Hegseth say nothing was discussed, got it. Did you think after getting caught they were going to come out and say Hegseth was showing Musk the Pentagon’s plans on China?
And these are “the adults?”
NEXT
No, rather I don’t believe confirmations from entities or individuals who have a track record of lying and manufacturing facts. When two such individuals say the secret meeting they were planning wasn’t anything after their exposure, commons sense dictates doubtyou selectively believe anonymous sources when it serves your initial views
and are too dumb to keep stories apart ~ not the adult!
lather.rinse.repeat
blablablaNo, rather I don’t believe confirmations from entities or individuals who have a track record of lying and manufacturing facts. When two such individuals say the secret meeting they were planning wasn’t anything after their exposure, commons sense dictates doubt
Those anonymous sources must have been credible enough for Musk, Hegseth, and Trump to immediately react with an impromptu press conferenceblablabla
anonymous sources are generally not worthy of discussion.
the military industrial complex has a friend in you tools though
derp derpThose anonymous sources must have been credible enough for Musk, Hegseth, and Trump to immediately react with an impromptu press conference
And bringing up military industrial complex is hysterical given your Messiah has us on a straight track to an oligopoly
That ^ has to be one of the most confused post I’ve seen in awhilederp derp
government regulations are controlled by the rich. the biggest examples of monopoly - outside of government itself - is government supported industry
like usual - you fricktards think you can blame us for what you are guilty of
first off dip shit - the government is a monopoly. the most monopolistic monopoly of all!That ^ has to be one of the most confused post I’ve seen in awhile
“Government regulations are controlled by the rich,” the rich I’m led to believe are some kind of monopoly, and the government supports industry, whatever that implies. And from all that someone called “fricktards” is to blame for all of it
Whatever