Annie
Not So Junior Member
What? Now 500k jobs might not be created OR save? :wtf: LOL! The MAN is clueless, as is the lame media that sells him:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090213/ap_on_bi_ge/congress_stimulus
That wasn't what he was saying the other night:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/09/us/politics/09text-obama.html?_r=1&pagewanted=print
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090213/ap_on_bi_ge/congress_stimulus
House passes Obama's economic stimulus bill
By ANDREW TAYLOR, Associated Press Writer
5 mins ago
WASHINGTON – Handing the new administration a big win, the House Friday passed President Barack Obama's $787 billion plan to resuscitate the economy.
The bill was passed 246-183 with no Republican help. It now goes to the Senate where a vote was possible late Friday to meet a deadline of passing the plan before a recess begins next week.
All but seven Democrats voted for the bill — a 1,071 page, 8-inch-thick measure that combines $281 billion in tax cuts for individuals and businesses with more than a half-trillion dollars in government spending. The money would go for infrastructure, health care and help for cash-starved state governments, among scores of programs. Seniors would get a $250 bonus Social Security check.
Obama claims the plan will save or create 3.5 million jobs, but Republicans said it won't work because it has too little in tax cuts and spreads too much money around to everyday projects like computer upgrades for federal agencies....
That wasn't what he was saying the other night:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/09/us/politics/09text-obama.html?_r=1&pagewanted=print
...Most economists, almost unanimously, recognize that even if philosophically you're -- you're wary of government intervening in the economy, when you have the kind of problem we have right now -- what started on Wall Street goes to Main Street, suddenly businesses can't get credit, they start paring back their investment, they start laying off workers, workers start pulling back in terms of spending -- that when you have that situation, that government is an important element of introducing some additional demand into the economy. We stand to lose about $1 trillion worth of demand this year and another trillion next year, and what that means is you've got this gaping hole in the economy.
That's why the -- the figure that we initially came up with, of approximately $800 billion, was put forward. That wasn't just some random number that I plucked out of -- out of a hat. That was Republican and Democratic, conservative and liberal economists that I spoke to, who indicated that given the magnitude of the crisis and the fact that it's happening worldwide, it's important for us to have a bill of sufficient size and scope that we can save or create 4 million jobs. That still means that you're going to have some net job loss, but at least we can start slowing the trend and moving it in the right direction....