Occupy vs. Tea Party

David St. Hubbins said:
Um, the causal relationship you need to establish is the purported negative coverage of the Tea Party leading to the decline in its popularity over time.
Click to expand...

LOL- The biased media coverage has absolutely 0 relationship to peoples impression- right. How is it do you suppose that the public has an opinion of the TEA Party then?
 
Onceler said:
I have always thought that propoganda by repetition was more on the right - like "Al Qaeda/Saddam," or "WMD's/Saddam."

But, I just learned this week that you don't know the difference between op-ed & a news piece, so I'm not sure which "media' you're talking about.
Click to expand...

Just for you........http://www.fas.org/irp/cia/product/iraq-wmd.pdf

Yeah....and I can give you quotes from Democrats about Saddam and WMD starting 1996 and continuing into 2003...7 years worth of rants..again and again
 
312660_10150323868848935_36496893934_7991663_931317460_n.jpg
 
bravo said:
Blaming the media in not only easy, its also the undeniable truth......its easier than the time honored traditional method of you blaming Bush for everything because you were telling a lie that needed the repeated over and over (the Nazi method) by the media to convince others........
Truth is always easier....
Click to expand...

That's the funny thing about the truth. You don't need to believe it, for it to be true. You need beliefs for what isn't true. (per Dr. Ron Smothermon, author of "Winning Through Enlightenment")
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top