hahahaha! now hmmmmmmmmmm? This is getting interesting for an old geezer that is closer to 50 than to 40....what should the ownage entail?
OMG Bush is going to do a good thing.
- Thread starter uscitizen
- Start date
hahahaha! now hmmmmmmmmmm? This is getting interesting for an old geezer that is closer to 50 than to 40....what should the ownage entail?
The classeless thing is nearly always leveled at women. I guess men have lower standards for themselves. (very conveniently)
They appear to believe that if they don't piss their pants while they're actually posting, that's a classy post.
Well, you can try listing him on Ebay, but frankly, I don't see you getting much for him.
Bare in mind, I don't mind lending him out for anything really: he makes a great foot stool. OH, do you still need help moving? That can easily be arranged.
Hmmmm, tomorrow I was going to go to "Draft Oprah Winfrey 2008", I'll have him go in my place instead.
Darla, do the Pink Ladies need a gopher of sorts?
Hmmmm, tomorrow I was going to go to "Draft Oprah Winfrey 2008", I'll have him go in my place instead.
Darla, do the Pink Ladies need a gopher of sorts?
Now that you mention it, it would be fabulous to have someone fetch us cappacinos when our meetings run late. Also, he can do the tops of our banners. You do get some vertigo all the way up on the top of those overpasses.
I really appreciate your donation Tiana!
No problem - I'm just naturally giving. I write him off anyway, so its not such a big deal.
TheDanold
Unimatrix
Take note that the majority of BOTH parties voted for this. Perhaps Repubs are interested in passing legislation to curb online gambling to aid big casinos, but it's important to note that traditionally casinos donated more to Dems to counter the religious right movement against gambling.
Meanwhile you can be damn sure that Dems are looking to protect state lottery funds that go into big gov.
NO NO NO NO NO NO
Stop it! you can NOT SAY THIS WHAT SO EVER!
I watched this debate and vote on the floor of the house and YOU, are passing around a LIE Dano...YES A LIE.
Every Democrat speaking on this Bill voiced out how disappointed they were that THIS LEADERSHIP SNUCK this Casino Gambling provision INSIDE OF A PORT SECURITY BILL for Christmas sake Dano...
Stop it
stop it
stop it
The twisting of the truth HAS GOT TO STOP Dano....
That Casino Gambling Bill SLIPPED IN THIS HOMELAND SECURITY Bill was done by REPUBLICANS....it was not suppose to be part of this Homeland Security for our Ports Bill and the Vote count you listed above was for the provision in the bill regarding our port Security.
If these people agreed to the Bill on Port Security they voted YES.
If they disagreed with the port security bill they voted NO.
The consideration for this Casino Measure was not considered.
This is why the REPUBLICAN LEADERSHIP slipped this Casino Gambling Measure in to this Port Security Bill right before an election...
They KNEW that this port security bill WOULD PASS...don't ya think? And this is why they slipped this Casino Gambling on the Internet measure in to the middle of this Port Security Bill.
You must know, if you watch the House of Representatives at all that this is HOW the Republicans do their dirty business and give their contributors WHAT THEY WANT while covering THEIR OWN ASSES by saying, "the Dems voted for this too, it was not just meeeeeee" CRAP.
now please Dano, stop this crap of yours...are you in cohoots with these people passing crap like this along of ''THE DEMS VOTED FOR IT TOO" first grader crap...this is why these repubs can continue to get away with slipping measures in to Bills WHERE THEY DON'T BELONG....because of people like you.
Continue your life of being a proud young man... that's a PAWN for Deceitfulness, or stop being that PAWN...your choice.
Care
Last edited:
I absolutely hate these last minute provisions. We need to work to curb them.
And Dano....hasn't it been TWO DECADES since the Republicans have been in the favor of Casino Lobbying, donations....?
When will republicans EVER TAKE RESPONSIBILITY for their own actions without having to do the first grader thing, of "mommy, they did it too" crap?
Please for the sake of yourself, grow up....please.
care
When will republicans EVER TAKE RESPONSIBILITY for their own actions without having to do the first grader thing, of "mommy, they did it too" crap?
Please for the sake of yourself, grow up....please.
care
TheDanold
Unimatrix
Sorry Care,
"According to the Center for Responsive Politics, tribes with casinos gave $144,721 to federal campaigns — 81 percent to Democrats, 19 percent to Republicans — in 1992. Ten years later, Indian gaming contributions topped $6.7 million. Even with new federal restrictions on campaign fund raising, Indian casinos this year have given more than $4.8 million to federal candidates and parties — 65 percent to Democrats, 35 percent to Republicans. "
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2002052159_indianvote02m.html
Casinos still give more to Dems, ergo if they were really expecting to get political payback by banning online casinos, they just wasted a ton of money, so obviously they did NOT expect this.
Is it really so hard to believe that the religious right or even people concerned with gambling were behind this ban? Don't be stupid and automatically tie money to legislation, it's not always the case.
I don't agree with it and I have no problem with online gambling, but to claim that big casino businesses are behind this is bull.
Lastly, having this bill tied to port security gives Dems an easy way to condemn the ban while voting to support it by supporting port security, they get the best of both worlds. HAD the vote been seperate, I suspect most of the Dems would have still voted for the ban - there is just too much left-wing interest in garnering bash from things like state lotteries...
uscitizen
Villified User
"According to the Center for Responsive Politics, tribes with casinos gave $144,721 to federal campaigns — 81 percent to Democrats, 19 percent to Republicans — in 1992. Ten years later, Indian gaming contributions topped $6.7 million. Even with new federal restrictions on campaign fund raising, Indian casinos this year have given more than $4.8 million to federal candidates and parties — 65 percent to Democrats, 35 percent to Republicans. "
//
What about the hole in the middle of that date range Damo ? With abramhoff out of the picture , sure current will be skewed. But what about between 92 and current ?
//
What about the hole in the middle of that date range Damo ? With abramhoff out of the picture , sure current will be skewed. But what about between 92 and current ?
I think you got the wrong name there...
uscitizen
Villified User
OOPS , a sincere apology Damo, yes I goofed on the name. And don't want you to think it was intentional at all. that was horrible of me to flub that up.