Paul is all hype

Damocles said:
He has less sense of humor than anybody on the board. He really thinks that people actually thought he would win based on thread count.

And yes, BAC, they were meant to be humorous.
Click to expand...

Dumb and even dumber.

I've nebver mentioned thread count and laughed at the notion.

More lies from the abyss.
 
blackascoal said:
Dumb and even dumber.

I've nebver mentioned thread count and laughed at the notion.

More lies from the abyss.
Click to expand...
Yet you continue to say that somebody here said he would win in reality? It didn't happen. We have always said that he wasn't going to win. You just continue to pimp the idea that somebody said he would in some context other than humor. It isn't true.
 
I never expected Ron Paul to win, though I thought he was going to do better in New Hampshire.

The anti-Paul "liberals" demonstrate how little they care for peace and civil liberties by their delight at Ron Paul's losing the NH primary. He was BY FAR the best chance for real peace among all the candidates, but now you should be happy because you can rest assured that it will once again be a choice of 1984 Statist Warmonger A vs. 1984 Statist Warmonger B for the two parties. Well done, friends.
 
ironhead said:
I never expected Ron Paul to win, though I thought he was going to do better in New Hampshire.

The anti-Paul "liberals" demonstrate how little they care for peace and civil liberties by their delight at Ron Paul's losing the NH primary. He was BY FAR the best chance for real peace among all the candidates, but now you should be happy because you can rest assured that it will once again be a choice of 1984 Statist Warmonger A vs. 1984 Statist Warmonger B for the two parties. Well done, friends.
Click to expand...
Shhh... You'll be sent to the re-education camp. That isn't proper NewThink!
 
ironhead said:
I never expected Ron Paul to win, though I thought he was going to do better in New Hampshire.

The anti-Paul "liberals" demonstrate how little they care for peace and civil liberties by their delight at Ron Paul's losing the NH primary. He was BY FAR the best chance for real peace among all the candidates, but now you should be happy because you can rest assured that it will once again be a choice of 1984 Statist Warmonger A vs. 1984 Statist Warmonger B for the two parties. Well done, friends.
Click to expand...


Like I said, I am hoping Obama is just pretending to be a warmonger. Pretty sad when the best you can hope for is that you are being lied to.
 
blackascoal said:
Wrong .. you're pure hogwash.

Paul was never a real candidate .. demonstrated by the fact that he's hardly spent any money trying to actually win a primary.

You can believe whatever the fuck you choose to believe but the bottom line is that he was NEVER a factor, unlike Nader, unlike Perot .. and he was never anything more than a drug-induced fraud.
Click to expand...

This would be one of those examples of you running around with your lips securely fastened to Nader's peanut pipe. And Rstring roundly showed on the other thread where you were wrong in just about every other way about Ron Paul.

In addition, Damocles is right, you really should get a sense of humor. Jesus, lighten up for once in your entire, drab life. Have you ever experienced enjoyment?

When the likes of Damocles and Rstring are telling you to get a sense of humor, its almost an emergency.
 
LOL...........

Damocles said:
Ron Paul is so Ron Paul that instead of shaving he just makes his hair grow on Chuck Norris' face. And you thought that was Chuck's beard!
Click to expand...



Chuck...said he was going to kick your 'Denver' ass for this comment....he dedicated the song to you 'Rocky Mountain High'
 
He also claims to love the Constitution but has yet to introduce articles of impeachment but yet two liberal democrats have (McKinney and Kucinich).

blackascoal said:
Was he a factor or not?

Was Perot a factor?

Ron Paul is NOT .. for that matter, nor has he ever been throughout his vapid political career.

He's a 20 year tired politician who can't even get his own bills passed and has never held a leadership position.

This is fun. :)

I said that when the primaries start, I will be having great fun with the Paultard dummies .. and so I am.
Click to expand...
 
yawn. Ron Paul isn't the only person running for president who cares about peace. That's bullshit and pathetic. Get a new line.

ironhead said:
I never expected Ron Paul to win, though I thought he was going to do better in New Hampshire.

The anti-Paul "liberals" demonstrate how little they care for peace and civil liberties by their delight at Ron Paul's losing the NH primary. He was BY FAR the best chance for real peace among all the candidates, but now you should be happy because you can rest assured that it will once again be a choice of 1984 Statist Warmonger A vs. 1984 Statist Warmonger B for the two parties. Well done, friends.
Click to expand...
 
SouthernBelle82 said:
yawn. Ron Paul isn't the only person running for president who cares about peace. That's bullshit and pathetic. Get a new line.
Click to expand...

Please learn to read to read better. I said he was the best chance for peace, not the only one. Ron Paul has certainly spoken more about ending the war than any other candidate, with Kucinich alongside him. However, Kucinich actually stood even less of a chance at winning the nomination than Ron Paul, which has been reflected in the initial primaries/caucuses. Sadly, most voters seem to be happy with candidates who will keep our troops active in empire-maintenance for the forseeable future.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top