where do you propose to lead the nation during this time of trial
in other words, we have a disease, now what cure do you propose
in other words, we have a disease, now what cure do you propose
what is the "disease"?
From my perspective, the issues most important are, energy independence, national security, education, and the economy. I would like to see Congress be able to work together in bipartisan manner, to solve the problems we face in these areas, rather than the continual partisan bickering. I think McCain has been one of the most 'bipartisan' members of Congress, and I think Palin has demonstrated her ability to be bipartisan as well. I think Obama and Biden represent the same status quot mentality that has created the current gridlock we see in Congress, and are the problem, not the solution.
what is the "disease"?
From my perspective, the issues most important are, energy independence, national security, education, and the economy. I would like to see Congress be able to work together in bipartisan manner, to solve the problems we face in these areas, rather than the continual partisan bickering. I think McCain has been one of the most 'bipartisan' members of Congress, and I think Palin has demonstrated her ability to be bipartisan as well. I think Obama and Biden represent the same status quot mentality that has created the current gridlock we see in Congress, and are the problem, not the solution.
How has Sarah Palin been bi-partisan? What has she done in Alaska? Was it during her tenure as mayor or in the last 2 years as Governor? What was the specific legislation?
perhaps, maybe the disease is partisan politics and a serious lack of long term planning
too many politicians do not plan beyond the next election
QFT
btw Dixie I thought you said Bush was going to fix everything ? Why didn't he esp while the repubs had control of everything ?
I never said Bush was going to fix everything, I just hoped he wouldn't destroy everything, as Gore and Kerry would have done. But why are you shifting the focus of the conversation off the four people who are currently running for president, and on to a man who will never again seek public office? Bush has nothing to do with this election or the issues of this election. It's just more of the diversionary politics you want to play, because your candidate and his running mate have absolutely nothing to offer to the American people.
Gore and Kerry would have distroyed everything?
Like Clinton did huh?
:lmao:
even dixie's tune has changed from a bush can walk on water, bush will make govt smaller, balance the budget, etc..
I may be getting older Dixie, but I can remember your song.
LOL... I never said Bush could walk on water, never said he would make government smaller. In fact, one of my biggest complaints of Bush was fiscal irresponsibility and growing government. Again I ask, why are you diverting the conversation off the four people currently running for president, and trying to focus on a man who will never run for any elected office again? The only rational reason I can conclude is, you don't want to talk about THIS election.
Hopes for Palin are misplaced right now. She's a newbie, and if elected, she'll be a newbie VP. She won't be given many major responsibilities, if any, and I doubt we'll see that much of her.
Beyond that, I'll never understand the obsession of some voters with electing "regular folks." I don't want "regular folks" making the kinds of huge decisions that a President makes. When I'm looking for an architect or surgeon or any other profession that requires more skill than I have, my last priority is "regular folks."
dixie after you blatant worship of bush for years I do nto trust your judgement at all on Politics. Why should I ?
With people as well as politicians I judge them by their track trecord.
No, if you did, you wouldn't be supporting Obama.