restrict hate speech

SmarterThanYou said:
thats great, but freedom of expression does not include the taking of a life, no matter how liberal they may be.
Click to expand...

depends on whose life and who takes it

like if someone committed rape against a member of my family - it would be illegal but i would likely be dead before they could execute me

normally my wife and i agree that the death penalty is too lenient, life in prison is much worse

maybe i am too ativistic
 
Good Luck said:
I don't think anyone is promoting the idea of random murder as a means of expression. The complaint is against those promoting the idea that somehow shutting down the guys hate-blogs might have prevented the event in question. It's a load of shit. I detest neonazi anti-semite fucks as much as anyone, but shutting down hate speech just opens the door to who defines what as hate speech (reference: DHS warning of who could be "far right extremists").

Is calling Obama a mindless big government hack "hate speech"? There are some who would say "yes".
Click to expand...

i called bush(co) worse - likely i just got on someones watch list

who knows, i may refer to bho as worse than that yet
 
DonQuixote said:
depends on whose life and who takes it

like if someone committed rape against a member of my family - it would be illegal but i would likely be dead before they could execute me

normally my wife and i agree that the death penalty is too lenient, life in prison is much worse

maybe i am too ativistic
Click to expand...

"...the death penalty is too lenient, life in prison is much worse"

I agree. Endless years of reflecting on what you did, why you did it, and perhaps wishing you could have changed it, would be torture to me.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top